PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFJSX vs. MJFOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFJSX vs. MJFOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA Japanese Small Company Portfolio (DFJSX) and Matthews Japan Fund (MJFOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFJSX achieves a 12.93% return, which is significantly lower than MJFOX's 16.96% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with DFJSX having a 8.65% annualized return and MJFOX not far ahead at 9.08%.


DFJSX

1D
-0.75%
1M
2.86%
YTD
12.93%
6M
16.13%
1Y
30.71%
3Y*
20.03%
5Y*
9.64%
10Y*
8.65%

MJFOX

1D
-0.28%
1M
5.70%
YTD
16.96%
6M
18.02%
1Y
28.75%
3Y*
23.06%
5Y*
8.52%
10Y*
9.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFJSX vs. MJFOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DFJSX
DFA Japanese Small Company Portfolio
12.93%31.65%4.35%17.08%-11.36%-0.39%3.78%18.23%-19.56%35.69%
MJFOX
Matthews Japan Fund
16.96%22.72%16.31%25.79%-27.84%-5.79%29.80%26.08%-20.12%33.22%

Correlation

The correlation between DFJSX and MJFOX is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 1999

0.78

The correlation between DFJSX and MJFOX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFJSX vs. MJFOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFJSX
DFJSX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
DFJSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFJSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFJSX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
DFJSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFJSX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

MJFOX
MJFOX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
MJFOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MJFOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
MJFOX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
MJFOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
MJFOX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFJSX vs. MJFOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA Japanese Small Company Portfolio (DFJSX) and Matthews Japan Fund (MJFOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFJSXMJFOXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.83

1.27

+0.56

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.60

1.94

+0.65

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.24

+0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.36

1.91

+0.45

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.54

6.82

+0.72

DFJSX vs. MJFOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFJSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is higher than the MJFOX Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFJSX and MJFOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFJSXMJFOXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.83

1.27

+0.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.42

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

0.48

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.37

-0.07

Drawdowns

DFJSX vs. MJFOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFJSX drawdown since its inception was -76.17%, which is greater than MJFOX's maximum drawdown of -63.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFJSX and MJFOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFJSXMJFOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.17%

-63.52%

-12.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.53%

-14.53%

+2.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.31%

-17.14%

+3.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.39%

-42.85%

+11.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.32%

-42.85%

+2.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.94%

-0.49%

-3.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.09%

-21.26%

-8.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.91%

4.04%

-0.13%

Volatility

DFJSX vs. MJFOX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DFA Japanese Small Company Portfolio (DFJSX) is 3.51%, while Matthews Japan Fund (MJFOX) has a volatility of 4.91%. This indicates that DFJSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MJFOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFJSXMJFOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.51%

4.91%

-1.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.46%

17.20%

-4.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.25%

21.89%

-5.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.15%

20.41%

-4.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.59%

18.85%

-2.26%

DFJSX vs. MJFOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFJSX has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than MJFOX's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFJSX vs. MJFOX - Dividend Comparison

DFJSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.09%, more than MJFOX's 1.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFJSX
DFA Japanese Small Company Portfolio
3.09%3.49%3.16%6.45%5.44%5.26%2.14%3.98%7.50%2.41%1.97%1.38%
MJFOX
Matthews Japan Fund
1.67%1.96%2.12%6.09%7.19%8.08%10.15%8.63%4.14%3.90%1.15%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFJSX and MJFOX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MJFOX has higher volatility (4.91%) compared to DFJSX (3.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFJSX dropped -76.17% vs MJFOX's -63.52%.

DFJSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFJSX and MJFOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer