DFJ vs. SCZ
DFJ (WisdomTree Japan SmallCap Dividend Fund) and SCZ (iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DFJ is a Japan Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree Japan SmallCap Dividend Index, while SCZ is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE Small Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DFJ returned 8.70%/yr vs 8.03%/yr for SCZ. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DFJ charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for SCZ.
Performance
DFJ vs. SCZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFJ achieves a 9.06% return, which is significantly lower than SCZ's 9.56% return. Over the past 10 years, DFJ has outperformed SCZ with an annualized return of 8.70%, while SCZ has yielded a comparatively lower 8.03% annualized return.
DFJ
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- 2.01%
- YTD
- 9.06%
- 6M
- 12.58%
- 1Y
- 26.81%
- 3Y*
- 18.99%
- 5Y*
- 9.51%
- 10Y*
- 8.70%
SCZ
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- 2.75%
- YTD
- 9.56%
- 6M
- 12.13%
- 1Y
- 24.04%
- 3Y*
- 16.13%
- 5Y*
- 5.02%
- 10Y*
- 8.03%
DFJ vs. SCZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFJ WisdomTree Japan SmallCap Dividend Fund | 9.06% | 31.90% | 2.80% | 21.81% | -9.00% | 0.38% | 1.29% | 16.98% | -18.53% | 32.14% |
SCZ iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF | 9.56% | 32.08% | 1.52% | 12.98% | -21.27% | 10.12% | 11.71% | 24.68% | -17.64% | 32.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFJ and SCZ is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2007 | 0.74 |
The correlation between DFJ and SCZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
DFJ vs. SCZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DFJ
SCZ
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Financial Services
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Real Estate
Utilities
Communication Services
Energy
Industrials
DFJ
SCZ
Consumer Cyclical
DFJ
SCZ
Basic Materials
DFJ
SCZ
Financial Services
DFJ
SCZ
Technology
DFJ
SCZ
Consumer Defensive
DFJ
SCZ
Healthcare
DFJ
SCZ
Real Estate
DFJ
SCZ
Utilities
DFJ
SCZ
Communication Services
DFJ
SCZ
Energy
DFJ
SCZ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFJ vs. SCZ — Risk / Return Rank
DFJ
SCZ
DFJ vs. SCZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Japan SmallCap Dividend Fund (DFJ) and iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFJ | SCZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.31 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.07 | 2.11 | -0.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.01 | 8.08 | -2.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFJ | SCZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.65 | 1.67 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 | 0.30 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | 0.46 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.27 | +0.04 |
Drawdowns
DFJ vs. SCZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFJ drawdown since its inception was -46.00%, smaller than the maximum SCZ drawdown of -61.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFJ and SCZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFJ | SCZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.00% | -61.86% | +15.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.03% | -11.43% | -1.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.03% | -15.06% | +2.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.71% | -36.87% | +7.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.02% | -41.07% | +1.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.92% | -1.79% | -5.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.15% | -13.06% | +1.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.47% | 2.98% | +1.49% |
Volatility
DFJ vs. SCZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree Japan SmallCap Dividend Fund (DFJ) is 4.15%, while iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ) has a volatility of 4.57%. This indicates that DFJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFJ | SCZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.15% | 4.57% | -0.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.48% | 11.95% | +1.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.39% | 14.47% | +1.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.89% | 16.74% | -0.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.95% | 17.43% | -0.48% |
DFJ vs. SCZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFJ has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than SCZ's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
DFJ vs. SCZ - Dividend Comparison
DFJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.44%, less than SCZ's 3.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFJ WisdomTree Japan SmallCap Dividend Fund | 2.44% | 2.68% | 2.46% | 2.43% | 2.62% | 2.07% | 2.59% | 2.24% | 1.89% | 1.60% | 1.76% | 1.23% |
SCZ iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF | 3.01% | 3.30% | 3.50% | 2.96% | 1.99% | 2.96% | 1.52% | 3.52% | 2.79% | 2.38% | 2.82% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DFJ and SCZ have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCZ has higher volatility (4.57%) compared to DFJ (4.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFJ dropped -46.00% vs SCZ's -61.86%.
On 10-year performance, DFJ leads with 8.70% vs 8.03% for SCZ. On fees, SCZ is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, DFJ has been the lower-risk option at 4.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DFJ has performed better with a 8.70% return vs 8.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCZ is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for DFJ.
SCZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.01%, compared with 2.44% for DFJ.
DFJ is categorized as Japan Equities, while SCZ is Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities. DFJ tracks WisdomTree Japan SmallCap Dividend Index, while SCZ tracks MSCI EAFE Small Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for DFJ and 0.40% for SCZ.
SCZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFJ and SCZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer