DFJ vs. EWS
DFJ (WisdomTree Japan SmallCap Dividend Fund) and EWS (iShares MSCI Singapore ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DFJ is a Japan Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree Japan SmallCap Dividend Index, while EWS is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Singapore Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DFJ returned 9.18%/yr vs 7.88%/yr for EWS. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DFJ charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for EWS.
Performance
DFJ vs. EWS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFJ achieves a 10.31% return, which is significantly higher than EWS's 5.96% return. Over the past 10 years, DFJ has outperformed EWS with an annualized return of 9.18%, while EWS has yielded a comparatively lower 7.88% annualized return.
DFJ
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- -1.56%
- YTD
- 10.31%
- 6M
- 11.99%
- 1Y
- 28.50%
- 3Y*
- 18.53%
- 5Y*
- 9.75%
- 10Y*
- 9.18%
EWS
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 0.24%
- YTD
- 5.96%
- 6M
- 7.68%
- 1Y
- 18.15%
- 3Y*
- 20.28%
- 5Y*
- 8.93%
- 10Y*
- 7.88%
DFJ vs. EWS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFJ WisdomTree Japan SmallCap Dividend Fund | 10.31% | 31.90% | 2.80% | 21.81% | -9.00% | 0.38% | 1.29% | 16.98% | -18.53% | 32.14% |
EWS iShares MSCI Singapore ETF | 5.96% | 31.35% | 22.10% | 6.15% | -9.80% | 5.47% | -8.47% | 14.54% | -11.34% | 34.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFJ and EWS is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2006 | 0.54 |
The correlation between DFJ and EWS shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (1 year) to 0.54 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
DFJ vs. EWS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DFJ
EWS
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Financial Services
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
Utilities
Communication Services
Energy
-
Industrials
DFJ
EWS
Consumer Cyclical
DFJ
EWS
Basic Materials
DFJ
EWS
-
Financial Services
DFJ
EWS
Technology
DFJ
EWS
Consumer Defensive
DFJ
EWS
Healthcare
DFJ
EWS
-
Real Estate
DFJ
EWS
Utilities
DFJ
EWS
Communication Services
DFJ
EWS
Energy
DFJ
EWS
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFJ vs. EWS — Risk / Return Rank
DFJ
EWS
DFJ vs. EWS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Japan SmallCap Dividend Fund (DFJ) and iShares MSCI Singapore ETF (EWS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DFJ | EWS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.21 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.11 | 2.24 | -0.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.97 | 5.40 | +0.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DFJ vs. EWS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFJ drawdown since its inception was -46.00%, smaller than the maximum EWS drawdown of -75.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFJ and EWS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFJ | EWS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.00% | -75.13% | +29.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.03% | -7.82% | -5.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.03% | -16.34% | +3.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.71% | -29.06% | -0.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.02% | -40.84% | +0.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.85% | -2.77% | -3.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.15% | -21.98% | +10.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.61% | 3.23% | +1.38% |
Volatility
DFJ vs. EWS - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree Japan SmallCap Dividend Fund (DFJ) and iShares MSCI Singapore ETF (EWS) have volatilities of 4.87% and 5.05%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFJ | EWS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.87% | 5.05% | -0.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.79% | 12.11% | +1.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.68% | 15.24% | +1.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.94% | 17.34% | -1.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.97% | 18.04% | -1.07% |
DFJ vs. EWS - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFJ has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than EWS's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
DFJ vs. EWS - Dividend Comparison
DFJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.41%, less than EWS's 3.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFJ WisdomTree Japan SmallCap Dividend Fund | 2.41% | 2.68% | 2.46% | 2.43% | 2.62% | 2.07% | 2.59% | 2.24% | 1.89% | 1.60% | 1.76% | 1.23% |
EWS iShares MSCI Singapore ETF | 3.87% | 4.10% | 4.28% | 6.50% | 2.56% | 6.00% | 2.68% | 4.70% | 4.21% | 3.46% | 3.96% | 4.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DFJ and EWS have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EWS has higher volatility (5.05%) compared to DFJ (4.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFJ dropped -46.00% vs EWS's -75.13%.
On 10-year performance, DFJ leads with 9.18% vs 7.88% for EWS. On fees, EWS is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, DFJ has been the lower-risk option at 4.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DFJ has performed better with a 9.18% return vs 7.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EWS is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for DFJ.
EWS has the higher dividend yield at 3.87%, compared with 2.41% for DFJ.
DFJ is categorized as Japan Equities, while EWS is Asia Pacific Equities. DFJ tracks WisdomTree Japan SmallCap Dividend Index, while EWS tracks MSCI Singapore Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for DFJ and 0.50% for EWS.
DFJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFJ and EWS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer