PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFJ vs. DGRW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFJ vs. DGRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Japan SmallCap Dividend Fund (DFJ) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with DFJ having a 9.06% return and DGRW slightly higher at 9.10%. Over the past 10 years, DFJ has underperformed DGRW with an annualized return of 8.70%, while DGRW has yielded a comparatively higher 14.15% annualized return.


DFJ

1D
-0.46%
1M
2.01%
YTD
9.06%
6M
12.58%
1Y
26.81%
3Y*
18.99%
5Y*
9.51%
10Y*
8.70%

DGRW

1D
-0.83%
1M
4.06%
YTD
9.10%
6M
8.62%
1Y
20.79%
3Y*
16.64%
5Y*
12.17%
10Y*
14.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFJ vs. DGRW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DFJ
WisdomTree Japan SmallCap Dividend Fund
9.06%31.90%2.80%21.81%-9.00%0.38%1.29%16.98%-18.53%32.14%
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
9.10%12.17%16.98%18.66%-6.33%24.46%13.87%29.54%-5.38%26.90%

Correlation

The correlation between DFJ and DGRW is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2013

0.56

The correlation between DFJ and DGRW shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (3 years) to 0.56 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DFJ vs. DGRW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DFJ
DGRW

Industrials

27.0%
9.9%

Consumer Cyclical

16.1%
7.1%

Basic Materials

13.3%
3.3%

Financial Services

13.3%
11.3%

Technology

12.6%
32.1%

Consumer Defensive

7.1%
6.7%

Healthcare

4.1%
12.8%

Real Estate

2.9%

-

Utilities

1.6%
0.2%

Communication Services

1.5%
10.1%

Energy

0.6%
5.0%

Industrials

DFJ
27.0%
DGRW
9.9%

Consumer Cyclical

DFJ
16.1%
DGRW
7.1%

Basic Materials

DFJ
13.3%
DGRW
3.3%

Financial Services

DFJ
13.3%
DGRW
11.3%

Technology

DFJ
12.6%
DGRW
32.1%

Consumer Defensive

DFJ
7.1%
DGRW
6.7%

Healthcare

DFJ
4.1%
DGRW
12.8%

Real Estate

DFJ
2.9%
DGRW

-

Utilities

DFJ
1.6%
DGRW
0.2%

Communication Services

DFJ
1.5%
DGRW
10.1%

Energy

DFJ
0.6%
DGRW
5.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFJ vs. DGRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFJ
DFJ Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
DFJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFJ Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
DFJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFJ Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRW
DGRW Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
DGRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRW Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRW Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFJ vs. DGRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Japan SmallCap Dividend Fund (DFJ) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFJDGRWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.39

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.07

2.52

-0.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.01

11.03

-5.02

DFJ vs. DGRW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFJ Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is comparable to the DGRW Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFJ and DGRW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFJDGRWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.65

2.12

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.88

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

0.88

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.86

-0.55

Drawdowns

DFJ vs. DGRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFJ drawdown since its inception was -46.00%, which is greater than DGRW's maximum drawdown of -32.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFJ and DGRW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFJDGRWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.00%

-32.04%

-13.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.03%

-8.30%

-4.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.03%

-16.21%

+3.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.71%

-17.27%

-12.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.02%

-32.04%

-7.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.92%

-0.83%

-6.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.15%

-3.01%

-8.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.47%

1.89%

+2.58%

Volatility

DFJ vs. DGRW - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Japan SmallCap Dividend Fund (DFJ) has a higher volatility of 4.15% compared to WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW) at 2.47%. This indicates that DFJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFJDGRWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.15%

2.47%

+1.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.48%

7.64%

+5.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.39%

9.88%

+6.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.89%

13.97%

+1.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.95%

16.21%

+0.74%

DFJ vs. DGRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFJ has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRW's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFJ vs. DGRW - Dividend Comparison

DFJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.44%, more than DGRW's 1.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFJ
WisdomTree Japan SmallCap Dividend Fund
2.44%2.68%2.46%2.43%2.62%2.07%2.59%2.24%1.89%1.60%1.76%1.23%
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
1.27%1.43%1.55%1.74%2.15%1.78%1.93%2.20%2.42%1.71%2.13%2.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFJ and DGRW have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DFJ has higher volatility (4.15%) compared to DGRW (2.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFJ dropped -46.00% vs DGRW's -32.04%.

On 10-year performance, DGRW leads with 14.15% vs 8.70% for DFJ. On fees, DGRW is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, DGRW has been the lower-risk option at 2.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DGRW has performed better with a 14.15% return vs 8.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DGRW is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for DFJ.

DFJ has the higher dividend yield at 2.44%, compared with 1.27% for DGRW.

DFJ is categorized as Japan Equities, while DGRW is Dividend. DFJ tracks WisdomTree Japan SmallCap Dividend Index, while DGRW tracks WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for DFJ and 0.28% for DGRW.

DGRW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFJ and DGRW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer