DFIV vs. DFAI
DFIV (Dimensional International Value ETF) and DFAI (Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DFIV is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional, while DFAI is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, DFIV returned 23.90%/yr vs 18.12%/yr for DFAI. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. DFIV charges 0.27%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for DFAI.
Performance
DFIV vs. DFAI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFIV achieves a 11.54% return, which is significantly higher than DFAI's 9.16% return.
DFIV
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 2.57%
- YTD
- 11.54%
- 6M
- 15.41%
- 1Y
- 34.88%
- 3Y*
- 23.90%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DFAI
- 1D
- -0.84%
- 1M
- 2.67%
- YTD
- 9.16%
- 6M
- 11.79%
- 1Y
- 24.65%
- 3Y*
- 18.12%
- 5Y*
- 9.36%
- 10Y*
- —
DFIV vs. DFAI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFIV Dimensional International Value ETF | 11.54% | 45.36% | 7.26% | 17.75% | -3.70% | 0.08% |
DFAI Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF | 9.16% | 34.04% | 4.68% | 17.60% | -12.95% | -1.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFIV and DFAI is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2021 | 0.95 |
The correlation between DFIV and DFAI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
DFIV vs. DFAI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DFIV
DFAI
Financial Services
Energy
Basic Materials
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Technology
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
DFIV
DFAI
Energy
DFIV
DFAI
Basic Materials
DFIV
DFAI
Industrials
DFIV
DFAI
Consumer Cyclical
DFIV
DFAI
Healthcare
DFIV
DFAI
Consumer Defensive
DFIV
DFAI
Communication Services
DFIV
DFAI
Technology
DFIV
DFAI
Utilities
DFIV
DFAI
Real Estate
DFIV
DFAI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFIV vs. DFAI — Risk / Return Rank
DFIV
DFAI
DFIV vs. DFAI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV) and Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF (DFAI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFIV | DFAI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.56 | 1.76 | +0.80 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.50 | 2.49 | +1.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.32 | +0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.63 | 2.26 | +1.37 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.02 | 8.87 | +5.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFIV | DFAI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.56 | 1.76 | +0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.94 | 0.78 | +0.15 |
Drawdowns
DFIV vs. DFAI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFIV drawdown since its inception was -25.42%, smaller than the maximum DFAI drawdown of -27.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFIV and DFAI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFIV | DFAI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.42% | -27.44% | +2.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.66% | -10.95% | +1.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.72% | -13.25% | -1.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.44% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.02% | -1.61% | +0.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.48% | -5.12% | +0.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.49% | 2.79% | -0.30% |
Volatility
DFIV vs. DFAI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV) is 3.89%, while Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF (DFAI) has a volatility of 4.45%. This indicates that DFIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFAI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFIV | DFAI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.89% | 4.45% | -0.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.99% | 11.68% | -0.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.69% | 14.08% | -0.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.63% | 15.92% | +0.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.63% | 15.70% | +0.93% |
DFIV vs. DFAI - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFIV has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is higher than DFAI's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
DFIV vs. DFAI - Dividend Comparison
DFIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.55%, more than DFAI's 2.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFAI Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF | 2.26% | 2.45% | 2.72% | 2.64% | 2.72% | 2.06% | 0.09% |
DFIV Dimensional International Value ETF | 2.55% | 2.92% | 3.88% | 3.93% | 3.84% | 2.30% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, DFIV and DFAI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
DFAI has higher volatility (4.45%) compared to DFIV (3.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFIV dropped -25.42% vs DFAI's -27.44%.
On 3-year performance, DFIV leads with 23.90% vs 18.12% for DFAI. On fees, DFAI is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, DFIV has been the lower-risk option at 3.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DFIV has performed better with a 23.90% return vs 18.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DFAI is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.27% for DFIV.
DFIV has the higher dividend yield at 2.55%, compared with 2.26% for DFAI.
DFIV is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while DFAI is Global Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.27% for DFIV and 0.18% for DFAI.
DFIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFIV and DFAI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer