PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFIV vs. DFAI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFIV vs. DFAI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV) and Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF (DFAI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFIV achieves a 11.54% return, which is significantly higher than DFAI's 9.16% return.


DFIV

1D
-0.70%
1M
2.57%
YTD
11.54%
6M
15.41%
1Y
34.88%
3Y*
23.90%
5Y*
10Y*

DFAI

1D
-0.84%
1M
2.67%
YTD
9.16%
6M
11.79%
1Y
24.65%
3Y*
18.12%
5Y*
9.36%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFIV vs. DFAI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
DFIV
Dimensional International Value ETF
11.54%45.36%7.26%17.75%-3.70%0.08%
DFAI
Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF
9.16%34.04%4.68%17.60%-12.95%-1.29%

Correlation

The correlation between DFIV and DFAI is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2021

0.95

The correlation between DFIV and DFAI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

DFIV vs. DFAI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DFIV
DFAI

Financial Services

32.4%
22.5%

Energy

16.4%
6.8%

Basic Materials

10.9%
8.8%

Industrials

9.6%
19.5%

Consumer Cyclical

9.6%
8.6%

Healthcare

4.9%
8.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
6.4%

Communication Services

4.2%
3.7%

Technology

2.8%
9.3%

Utilities

2.5%
4.0%

Real Estate

1.8%
1.5%

Financial Services

DFIV
32.4%
DFAI
22.5%

Energy

DFIV
16.4%
DFAI
6.8%

Basic Materials

DFIV
10.9%
DFAI
8.8%

Industrials

DFIV
9.6%
DFAI
19.5%

Consumer Cyclical

DFIV
9.6%
DFAI
8.6%

Healthcare

DFIV
4.9%
DFAI
8.8%

Consumer Defensive

DFIV
4.9%
DFAI
6.4%

Communication Services

DFIV
4.2%
DFAI
3.7%

Technology

DFIV
2.8%
DFAI
9.3%

Utilities

DFIV
2.5%
DFAI
4.0%

Real Estate

DFIV
1.8%
DFAI
1.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFIV vs. DFAI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFIV
DFIV Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
DFIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFIV Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
DFIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFIV Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

DFAI
DFAI Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
DFAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFAI Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
DFAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFAI Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFIV vs. DFAI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV) and Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF (DFAI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFIVDFAIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.56

1.76

+0.80

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.50

2.49

+1.01

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.32

+0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.63

2.26

+1.37

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.02

8.87

+5.15

DFIV vs. DFAI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFIV Sharpe Ratio is 2.56, which is higher than the DFAI Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFIV and DFAI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFIVDFAIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.56

1.76

+0.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.94

0.78

+0.15

Drawdowns

DFIV vs. DFAI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFIV drawdown since its inception was -25.42%, smaller than the maximum DFAI drawdown of -27.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFIV and DFAI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFIVDFAIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.42%

-27.44%

+2.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.66%

-10.95%

+1.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.72%

-13.25%

-1.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.02%

-1.61%

+0.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.48%

-5.12%

+0.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.49%

2.79%

-0.30%

Volatility

DFIV vs. DFAI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV) is 3.89%, while Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF (DFAI) has a volatility of 4.45%. This indicates that DFIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFAI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFIVDFAIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.89%

4.45%

-0.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.99%

11.68%

-0.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.69%

14.08%

-0.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.63%

15.92%

+0.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.63%

15.70%

+0.93%

DFIV vs. DFAI - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFIV has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is higher than DFAI's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DFIV vs. DFAI - Dividend Comparison

DFIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.55%, more than DFAI's 2.26% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
DFAI
Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF
2.26%2.45%2.72%2.64%2.72%2.06%0.09%
DFIV
Dimensional International Value ETF
2.55%2.92%3.88%3.93%3.84%2.30%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, DFIV and DFAI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DFAI has higher volatility (4.45%) compared to DFIV (3.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFIV dropped -25.42% vs DFAI's -27.44%.

On 3-year performance, DFIV leads with 23.90% vs 18.12% for DFAI. On fees, DFAI is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, DFIV has been the lower-risk option at 3.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, DFIV has performed better with a 23.90% return vs 18.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DFAI is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.27% for DFIV.

DFIV has the higher dividend yield at 2.55%, compared with 2.26% for DFAI.

DFIV is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while DFAI is Global Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.27% for DFIV and 0.18% for DFAI.

DFIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFIV and DFAI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer