DFIV vs. DFAC

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DFIV (Dimensional International Value ETF) and DFAC (Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DFIV is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional, while DFAC is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, DFIV returned 23.90%/yr vs 20.56%/yr for DFAC. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DFIV charges 0.27%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for DFAC.

Performance

DFIV vs. DFAC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV) and Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with DFIV having a 11.54% return and DFAC slightly higher at 11.90%.

DFIV

• 1D: -0.70%
• 1M: 2.57%
• YTD: 11.54%
• 6M: 15.41%
• 1Y: 34.88%
• 3Y*: 23.90%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DFAC

• 1D: -0.67%
• 1M: 4.57%
• YTD: 11.90%
• 6M: 12.19%
• 1Y: 28.89%
• 3Y*: 20.56%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFIV vs. DFAC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
DFIV Dimensional International Value ETF	11.54%	45.36%	7.26%	17.75%	-3.70%	0.08%
DFAC Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF	11.90%	15.66%	19.61%	21.96%	-14.93%	6.61%

Correlation

The correlation between DFIV and DFAC is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.69
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2021	0.72

The correlation between DFIV and DFAC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

DFIV vs. DFAC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DFIV	DFAC
Financial Services	32.4%	14.4%
Energy	16.4%	5.9%
Basic Materials	10.9%	3.2%
Industrials	9.6%	12.8%
Consumer Cyclical	9.6%	10.7%
Healthcare	4.9%	9.0%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	4.9%
Communication Services	4.2%	8.4%
Technology	2.8%	28.4%
Utilities	2.5%	1.9%
Real Estate	1.8%	0.2%

Return for Risk

DFIV vs. DFAC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFIV

DFIV Risk / Return Rank: 75
DFIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
DFIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
DFIV Omega Ratio Rank: 75
DFIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
DFIV Martin Ratio Rank: 73

DFAC

DFAC Risk / Return Rank: 71
DFAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
DFAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
DFAC Omega Ratio Rank: 70
DFAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
DFAC Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFIV vs. DFAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV) and Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DFIV	DFAC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.56	2.39	+0.17
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.50	3.31	+0.19
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.43	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.63	3.42	+0.21
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.02	15.17	-1.15
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DFIV vs. DFAC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFIV Sharpe Ratio is 2.56, which is comparable to the DFAC Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFIV and DFAC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DFIV	DFAC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.56	2.39	+0.17
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.94	0.71	+0.23

Drawdowns

DFIV vs. DFAC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFIV drawdown since its inception was -25.42%, which is greater than DFAC's maximum drawdown of -23.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFIV and DFAC.

Drawdown Indicators

	DFIV	DFAC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.42%	-23.12%	-2.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.66%	-8.49%	-1.17%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.72%	-20.02%	+5.30%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.02%	-0.67%	-0.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.48%	-5.45%	+0.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.49%	1.91%	+0.58%

Volatility

DFIV vs. DFAC - Volatility Comparison

Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV) has a higher volatility of 3.89% compared to Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAC) at 3.01%. This indicates that DFIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DFIV	DFAC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.89%	3.01%	+0.88%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.99%	8.96%	+2.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.69%	12.15%	+1.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.63%	17.13%	-0.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.63%	17.13%	-0.50%

DFIV vs. DFAC - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFIV has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is higher than DFAC's 0.17% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

DFIV vs. DFAC - Dividend Comparison

DFIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.55%, more than DFAC's 0.91% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
DFAC Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF	0.91%	0.97%	1.03%	1.20%	1.50%	0.88%
DFIV Dimensional International Value ETF	2.55%	2.92%	3.88%	3.93%	3.84%	2.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DFIV and DFAC in my portfolio?

DFIV and DFAC have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DFIV or DFAC?

DFIV has higher volatility (3.89%) compared to DFAC (3.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFIV dropped -25.42% vs DFAC's -23.12%.

Which ETF is better, DFIV or DFAC?

On 3-year performance, DFIV leads with 23.90% vs 20.56% for DFAC. On fees, DFAC is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, DFAC has been the lower-risk option at 3.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DFIV or DFAC?

Over the 3-year period, DFIV has performed better with a 23.90% return vs 20.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DFIV or DFAC?

DFAC is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.27% for DFIV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DFIV or DFAC?

DFIV has the higher dividend yield at 2.55%, compared with 0.91% for DFAC.

What is the main difference between DFIV and DFAC?

DFIV is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while DFAC is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.27% for DFIV and 0.17% for DFAC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DFIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.