DFIV vs. DBE

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

DFIV (Dimensional International Value ETF) and DBE (Invesco DB Energy Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - DFIV is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional, while DBE is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Energy Index. DFIV is actively managed, while DBE is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DFIV returned 24.19%/yr vs 22.48%/yr for DBE. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DFIV charges 0.27%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for DBE.

Performance

DFIV vs. DBE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFIV achieves a 12.32% return, which is significantly lower than DBE's 79.50% return.

DFIV

• 1D: 0.90%
• 1M: 1.93%
• YTD: 12.32%
• 6M: 16.68%
• 1Y: 34.94%
• 3Y*: 24.19%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DBE

• 1D: 0.80%
• 1M: -3.65%
• YTD: 79.50%
• 6M: 72.59%
• 1Y: 82.31%
• 3Y*: 22.48%
• 5Y*: 19.20%
• 10Y*: 11.78%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFIV vs. DBE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
DFIV Dimensional International Value ETF	12.32%	45.36%	7.26%	17.75%	-3.70%	0.08%
DBE Invesco DB Energy Fund	79.50%	-2.17%	2.96%	-12.14%	33.77%	6.74%

Correlation

The correlation between DFIV and DBE is -0.25, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.25
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.03
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2021	0.20

The correlation between DFIV and DBE shifts across timeframes, from -0.25 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

DFIV vs. DBE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFIV

DFIV Risk / Return Rank: 76
DFIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
DFIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
DFIV Omega Ratio Rank: 77
DFIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
DFIV Martin Ratio Rank: 75

DBE

DBE Risk / Return Rank: 71
DBE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
DBE Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
DBE Omega Ratio Rank: 64
DBE Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
DBE Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFIV vs. DBE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DFIV	DBE	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.57	2.37	+0.20
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.50	2.91	+0.60
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.39	+0.07
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.78	6.10	-2.32
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	14.65	11.98	+2.67
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DFIV vs. DBE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFIV Sharpe Ratio is 2.57, which is comparable to the DBE Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFIV and DBE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DFIV	DBE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.57	2.37	+0.20
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.66	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.42	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.95	0.09	+0.86

Drawdowns

DFIV vs. DBE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFIV drawdown since its inception was -25.42%, smaller than the maximum DBE drawdown of -86.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFIV and DBE.

Drawdown Indicators

	DFIV	DBE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.42%	-86.69%	+61.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.66%	-14.41%	+4.75%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.72%	-23.89%	+9.17%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-38.74%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-60.84%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.32%	-31.85%	+31.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.48%	-57.31%	+52.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.49%	7.34%	-4.85%

Volatility

DFIV vs. DBE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV) is 4.08%, while Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE) has a volatility of 13.47%. This indicates that DFIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DFIV	DBE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.08%	13.47%	-9.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.96%	30.80%	-19.84%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.70%	35.02%	-21.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.64%	29.37%	-12.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.64%	28.33%	-11.69%

DFIV vs. DBE - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFIV has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is lower than DBE's 0.78% expense ratio.

Dividends

DFIV vs. DBE - Dividend Comparison

DFIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, more than DBE's 2.15% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
DBE Invesco DB Energy Fund	2.15%	3.86%	6.32%	3.87%	0.75%	0.00%	0.00%	1.79%	1.67%
DFIV Dimensional International Value ETF	2.54%	2.92%	3.88%	3.93%	3.84%	2.30%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DFIV and DBE in my portfolio?

DFIV and DBE have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DFIV or DBE?

DBE has higher volatility (13.47%) compared to DFIV (4.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFIV dropped -25.42% vs DBE's -86.69%.

Which ETF is better, DFIV or DBE?

On 3-year performance, DFIV leads with 24.19% vs 22.48% for DBE. On fees, DFIV is cheaper at 0.27% per year. On volatility, DFIV has been the lower-risk option at 4.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DFIV or DBE?

Over the 3-year period, DFIV has performed better with a 24.19% return vs 22.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DFIV or DBE?

DFIV is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DFIV or DBE?

DFIV has the higher dividend yield at 2.54%, compared with 2.15% for DBE.

What is the main difference between DFIV and DBE?

DFIV is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while DBE is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.27% for DFIV and 0.78% for DBE.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DFIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 2.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.