PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFII vs. ETHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFII vs. ETHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy & Target Income ETF (DFII) and ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF (ETHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFII achieves a -26.34% return, which is significantly lower than ETHD's 30.34% return.


DFII

1D
-1.10%
1M
-1.74%
6M
-31.57%
YTD
-26.34%
1Y
-44.75%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ETHD

1D
4.50%
1M
-14.26%
6M
64.16%
YTD
30.34%
1Y
-10.25%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFII vs. ETHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DFII and ETHD is -0.89, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2025

-0.85

The correlation between DFII and ETHD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.89 to -0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFII vs. ETHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFII
DFII Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
DFII Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFII Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFII Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
DFII Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFII Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

ETHD
ETHD Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
ETHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETHD Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
ETHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETHD Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFII vs. ETHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy & Target Income ETF (DFII) and ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF (ETHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DFIIETHDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.82

1.10

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.88

-0.17

-0.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.42

-0.27

-1.14

DFII vs. ETHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFII Sharpe Ratio is -1.07, which is lower than the ETHD Sharpe Ratio of -0.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFII and ETHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DFII vs. ETHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFII drawdown since its inception was -51.04%, smaller than the maximum ETHD drawdown of -95.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFII and ETHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFIIETHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.04%

-95.59%

+44.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-51.04%

-60.45%

+9.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-47.07%

-89.82%

+42.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.58%

-67.04%

+45.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

31.61%

38.15%

-6.54%

Volatility

DFII vs. ETHD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy & Target Income ETF (DFII) is 9.79%, while ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF (ETHD) has a volatility of 29.48%. This indicates that DFII experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ETHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFIIETHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.79%

29.48%

-19.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.57%

94.34%

-60.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.12%

136.33%

-94.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.83%

141.48%

-100.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.83%

141.48%

-100.65%

DFII vs. ETHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFII has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than ETHD's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFII vs. ETHD - Dividend Comparison

DFII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 27.28%, more than ETHD's 5.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
DFII
FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy & Target Income ETF
27.28%15.51%0.00%
ETHD
ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF
5.71%156.62%19.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFII and ETHD have a correlation of -0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ETHD has higher volatility (29.48%) compared to DFII (9.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFII dropped -51.04% vs ETHD's -95.59%.

On 1-year performance, ETHD leads with -10.25% vs -44.75% for DFII. On fees, DFII is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, DFII has been the lower-risk option at 9.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ETHD has performed better with a -10.25% return vs -44.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DFII is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for ETHD.

DFII has the higher dividend yield at 27.28%, compared with 5.71% for ETHD.

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for DFII and 1.01% for ETHD.

ETHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.08 vs -1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFII and ETHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer