PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFII vs. ETHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFII vs. ETHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy & Target Income ETF (DFII) and ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF (ETHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFII achieves a -24.78% return, which is significantly lower than ETHD's 63.80% return.


DFII

1D
-2.65%
1M
-17.17%
YTD
-24.78%
6M
-28.08%
1Y
-37.26%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ETHD

1D
11.25%
1M
66.19%
YTD
63.80%
6M
72.54%
1Y
-42.18%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFII vs. ETHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DFII and ETHD is -0.87, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2025

-0.85

The correlation between DFII and ETHD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.87 to -0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFII vs. ETHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFII
DFII Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
DFII Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFII Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFII Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
DFII Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFII Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

ETHD
ETHD Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
ETHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETHD Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
ETHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETHD Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFII vs. ETHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy & Target Income ETF (DFII) and ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF (ETHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFIIETHDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.86

1.05

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.78

-0.51

-0.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.38

-0.64

-0.74

DFII vs. ETHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFII Sharpe Ratio is -0.91, which is lower than the ETHD Sharpe Ratio of -0.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFII and ETHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFIIETHDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.91

-0.31

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.44

-0.35

-0.09

Drawdowns

DFII vs. ETHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFII drawdown since its inception was -48.07%, smaller than the maximum ETHD drawdown of -95.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFII and ETHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFIIETHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.07%

-95.59%

+47.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-48.07%

-83.63%

+35.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-45.95%

-87.20%

+41.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.01%

-66.01%

+47.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

27.04%

66.00%

-38.96%

Volatility

DFII vs. ETHD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy & Target Income ETF (DFII) is 9.03%, while ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF (ETHD) has a volatility of 19.00%. This indicates that DFII experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ETHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFIIETHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.03%

19.00%

-9.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.27%

92.37%

-59.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.33%

136.23%

-94.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

41.08%

142.19%

-101.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.08%

142.19%

-101.11%

DFII vs. ETHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFII has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than ETHD's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFII vs. ETHD - Dividend Comparison

DFII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 27.87%, more than ETHD's 10.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
DFII
FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy & Target Income ETF
27.87%15.51%0.00%
ETHD
ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF
10.68%156.62%19.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFII and ETHD have a correlation of -0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ETHD has higher volatility (19.00%) compared to DFII (9.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFII dropped -48.07% vs ETHD's -95.59%.

On 1-year performance, DFII leads with -37.26% vs -42.18% for ETHD. On fees, DFII is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, DFII has been the lower-risk option at 9.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DFII has performed better with a -37.26% return vs -42.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DFII is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for ETHD.

DFII has the higher dividend yield at 27.87%, compared with 10.68% for ETHD.

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for DFII and 1.01% for ETHD.

ETHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.31 vs -0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFII and ETHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer