PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFII vs. ETHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFII vs. ETHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy & Target Income ETF (DFII) and ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF (ETHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFII achieves a -28.19% return, which is significantly lower than ETHD's 75.32% return.


DFII

1D
-2.94%
1M
-17.11%
YTD
-28.19%
6M
-28.07%
1Y
-38.89%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ETHD

1D
8.45%
1M
38.06%
YTD
75.32%
6M
75.17%
1Y
-49.20%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFII vs. ETHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DFII and ETHD is -0.88, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2025

-0.85

The correlation between DFII and ETHD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.88 to -0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFII vs. ETHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFII
DFII Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
DFII Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFII Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFII Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
DFII Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFII Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

ETHD
ETHD Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
ETHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETHD Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
ETHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETHD Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFII vs. ETHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy & Target Income ETF (DFII) and ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF (ETHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DFIIETHDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.85

1.03

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.78

-0.60

-0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.34

-0.77

-0.57

DFII vs. ETHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFII Sharpe Ratio is -0.93, which is lower than the ETHD Sharpe Ratio of -0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFII and ETHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DFII vs. ETHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFII drawdown since its inception was -50.13%, smaller than the maximum ETHD drawdown of -95.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFII and ETHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFIIETHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.13%

-95.59%

+45.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-50.13%

-82.01%

+31.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-48.40%

-86.30%

+37.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.16%

-66.40%

+46.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

29.13%

66.92%

-37.79%

Volatility

DFII vs. ETHD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy & Target Income ETF (DFII) is 12.48%, while ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF (ETHD) has a volatility of 39.39%. This indicates that DFII experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ETHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFIIETHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.48%

39.39%

-26.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.37%

93.71%

-60.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.94%

137.55%

-95.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

41.20%

142.54%

-101.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.20%

142.54%

-101.34%

DFII vs. ETHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFII has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than ETHD's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFII vs. ETHD - Dividend Comparison

DFII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 29.19%, more than ETHD's 9.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
DFII
FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy & Target Income ETF
29.19%15.51%0.00%
ETHD
ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF
9.98%156.62%19.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFII and ETHD have a correlation of -0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ETHD has higher volatility (39.39%) compared to DFII (12.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFII dropped -50.13% vs ETHD's -95.59%.

On 1-year performance, DFII leads with -38.89% vs -49.20% for ETHD. On fees, DFII is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, DFII has been the lower-risk option at 12.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DFII has performed better with a -38.89% return vs -49.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DFII is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for ETHD.

DFII has the higher dividend yield at 29.19%, compared with 9.98% for ETHD.

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for DFII and 1.01% for ETHD.

ETHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.36 vs -0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFII and ETHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer