DFII vs. ETHD
DFII (FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy & Target Income ETF) and ETHD (ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, DFII returned -37.26% vs -42.18% for ETHD. At a correlation of -0.85, they often move in opposite directions. DFII charges 0.85%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for ETHD.
Performance
DFII vs. ETHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFII achieves a -24.78% return, which is significantly lower than ETHD's 63.80% return.
DFII
- 1D
- -2.65%
- 1M
- -17.17%
- YTD
- -24.78%
- 6M
- -28.08%
- 1Y
- -37.26%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETHD
- 1D
- 11.25%
- 1M
- 66.19%
- YTD
- 63.80%
- 6M
- 72.54%
- 1Y
- -42.18%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DFII vs. ETHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DFII FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy & Target Income ETF | -24.78% | 5.61% |
ETHD ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF | 63.80% | -88.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFII and ETHD is -0.87, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2025 | -0.85 |
The correlation between DFII and ETHD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.87 to -0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFII vs. ETHD — Risk / Return Rank
DFII
ETHD
DFII vs. ETHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy & Target Income ETF (DFII) and ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF (ETHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFII | ETHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 1.05 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.78 | -0.51 | -0.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.38 | -0.64 | -0.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFII | ETHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.91 | -0.31 | -0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.44 | -0.35 | -0.09 |
Drawdowns
DFII vs. ETHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFII drawdown since its inception was -48.07%, smaller than the maximum ETHD drawdown of -95.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFII and ETHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFII | ETHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.07% | -95.59% | +47.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -48.07% | -83.63% | +35.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -45.95% | -87.20% | +41.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.01% | -66.01% | +47.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 27.04% | 66.00% | -38.96% |
Volatility
DFII vs. ETHD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy & Target Income ETF (DFII) is 9.03%, while ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF (ETHD) has a volatility of 19.00%. This indicates that DFII experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ETHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFII | ETHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.03% | 19.00% | -9.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.27% | 92.37% | -59.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.33% | 136.23% | -94.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.08% | 142.19% | -101.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.08% | 142.19% | -101.11% |
DFII vs. ETHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFII has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than ETHD's 1.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
DFII vs. ETHD - Dividend Comparison
DFII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 27.87%, more than ETHD's 10.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
DFII FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy & Target Income ETF | 27.87% | 15.51% | 0.00% |
ETHD ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF | 10.68% | 156.62% | 19.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DFII and ETHD have a correlation of -0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ETHD has higher volatility (19.00%) compared to DFII (9.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFII dropped -48.07% vs ETHD's -95.59%.
On 1-year performance, DFII leads with -37.26% vs -42.18% for ETHD. On fees, DFII is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, DFII has been the lower-risk option at 9.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DFII has performed better with a -37.26% return vs -42.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DFII is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for ETHD.
DFII has the higher dividend yield at 27.87%, compared with 10.68% for ETHD.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for DFII and 1.01% for ETHD.
ETHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.31 vs -0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFII and ETHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer