PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFII vs. BITC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFII vs. BITC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy & Target Income ETF (DFII) and Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF (BITC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFII achieves a -24.78% return, which is significantly lower than BITC's 6.98% return.


DFII

1D
-2.65%
1M
-17.17%
YTD
-24.78%
6M
-28.08%
1Y
-37.26%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BITC

1D
-0.00%
1M
-4.31%
YTD
6.98%
6M
-1.22%
1Y
-15.09%
3Y*
36.02%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFII vs. BITC - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DFII and BITC is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2025

0.59

The correlation between DFII and BITC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFII vs. BITC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFII
DFII Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
DFII Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFII Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFII Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
DFII Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFII Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

BITC
BITC Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
BITC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITC Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITC Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
BITC Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITC Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFII vs. BITC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy & Target Income ETF (DFII) and Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF (BITC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFIIBITCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.86

0.90

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.78

-0.57

-0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.38

-0.82

-0.56

DFII vs. BITC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFII Sharpe Ratio is -0.91, which is lower than the BITC Sharpe Ratio of -0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFII and BITC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFIIBITCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.91

-0.59

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.44

0.68

-1.12

Drawdowns

DFII vs. BITC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFII drawdown since its inception was -48.07%, which is greater than BITC's maximum drawdown of -38.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFII and BITC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFIIBITCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.07%

-38.51%

-9.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-48.07%

-26.51%

-21.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-45.95%

-26.48%

-19.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.01%

-16.37%

-2.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

27.04%

18.37%

+8.67%

Volatility

DFII vs. BITC - Volatility Comparison

FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy & Target Income ETF (DFII) has a higher volatility of 9.03% compared to Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF (BITC) at 6.39%. This indicates that DFII's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BITC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFIIBITCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.03%

6.39%

+2.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.27%

19.98%

+13.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.33%

25.54%

+15.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

41.08%

46.65%

-5.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.08%

46.65%

-5.57%

DFII vs. BITC - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFII has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than BITC's 0.88% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFII vs. BITC - Dividend Comparison

DFII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 27.87%, more than BITC's 3.14% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
BITC
Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF
3.14%3.36%42.68%5.82%
DFII
FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy & Target Income ETF
27.87%15.51%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFII and BITC have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DFII has higher volatility (9.03%) compared to BITC (6.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFII dropped -48.07% vs BITC's -38.51%.

On 1-year performance, BITC leads with -15.09% vs -37.26% for DFII. On fees, DFII is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, BITC has been the lower-risk option at 6.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BITC has performed better with a -15.09% return vs -37.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DFII is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for BITC.

DFII has the higher dividend yield at 27.87%, compared with 3.14% for BITC.

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Bitwise. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for DFII and 0.88% for BITC.

BITC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.59 vs -0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFII and BITC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer