DFII vs. BFOC
DFII (FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy & Target Income ETF) and BFOC (FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October) are both exchange-traded funds - DFII is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by First Trust, while BFOC is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by First Trust. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DFII charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for BFOC.
Performance
DFII vs. BFOC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFII achieves a -28.19% return, which is significantly lower than BFOC's -7.58% return.
DFII
- 1D
- -2.94%
- 1M
- -17.11%
- YTD
- -28.19%
- 6M
- -28.07%
- 1Y
- -38.89%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BFOC
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- -1.05%
- YTD
- -7.58%
- 6M
- -7.79%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DFII vs. BFOC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DFII FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy & Target Income ETF | -28.19% | -22.50% |
BFOC FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October | -7.58% | -9.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFII and BFOC is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025 | 0.88 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFII vs. BFOC — Risk / Return Rank
DFII
BFOC
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DFII vs. BFOC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy & Target Income ETF (DFII) and FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October (BFOC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DFII | BFOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.78 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.34 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DFII vs. BFOC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFII drawdown since its inception was -50.13%, which is greater than BFOC's maximum drawdown of -18.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFII and BFOC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFII | BFOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.13% | -18.41% | -31.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -50.13% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.40% | -18.36% | -30.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.16% | -12.84% | -7.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 29.13% | — | — |
Volatility
DFII vs. BFOC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFII | BFOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.48% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.37% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.94% | 12.31% | +29.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.20% | 12.31% | +28.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.20% | 12.31% | +28.89% |
DFII vs. BFOC - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFII has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than BFOC's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
DFII vs. BFOC - Dividend Comparison
DFII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 29.19%, while BFOC has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BFOC FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DFII FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy & Target Income ETF | 29.19% | 15.51% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DFII and BFOC have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DFII is cheaper at 0.85% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DFII is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BFOC.
DFII has the higher dividend yield at 29.19%, compared with 0.00% for BFOC.
DFII is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while BFOC is Defined Outcome. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for DFII and 0.90% for BFOC.
Find the right allocation for DFII and BFOC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer