DFGR vs. RWO

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

DFGR (Dimensional Global Real Estate ETF) and RWO (SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ETF) are both REIT funds. DFGR is actively managed, while RWO is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DFGR returned 11.14%/yr vs 11.85%/yr for RWO. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. DFGR charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for RWO.

Performance

DFGR vs. RWO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional Global Real Estate ETF (DFGR) and SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ETF (RWO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFGR achieves a 10.41% return, which is significantly lower than RWO's 11.44% return.

DFGR

• 1D: 0.41%
• 1M: 0.41%
• YTD: 10.41%
• 6M: 10.83%
• 1Y: 11.18%
• 3Y*: 11.14%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RWO

• 1D: 0.96%
• 1M: 0.76%
• YTD: 11.44%
• 6M: 11.34%
• 1Y: 14.87%
• 3Y*: 11.85%
• 5Y*: 2.53%
• 10Y*: 3.88%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFGR vs. RWO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
DFGR Dimensional Global Real Estate ETF	10.41%	7.65%	1.89%	9.64%	-1.20%
RWO SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ETF	11.44%	8.87%	1.76%	10.91%	-1.35%

Correlation

The correlation between DFGR and RWO is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2022	0.97

The correlation between DFGR and RWO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

DFGR vs. RWO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFGR

DFGR Risk / Return Rank: 27
DFGR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
DFGR Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
DFGR Omega Ratio Rank: 25
DFGR Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
DFGR Martin Ratio Rank: 31

RWO

RWO Risk / Return Rank: 34
RWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
RWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
RWO Omega Ratio Rank: 31
RWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
RWO Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFGR vs. RWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Global Real Estate ETF (DFGR) and SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ETF (RWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DFGR	RWO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.92	1.14	-0.22
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.32	1.61	-0.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.20	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.23	1.57	-0.34
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.32	6.03	-1.71

DFGR vs. RWO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFGR Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is comparable to the RWO Sharpe Ratio of 1.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFGR and RWO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DFGR vs. RWO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFGR drawdown since its inception was -21.28%, smaller than the maximum RWO drawdown of -67.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFGR and RWO.

Drawdown Indicators

	DFGR	RWO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.28%	-67.69%	+46.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.15%	-9.51%	+0.36%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.57%	-17.66%	+0.09%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-32.85%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-43.27%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.42%	-0.78%	-0.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.22%	-12.64%	+6.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.59%	2.47%	+0.12%

Volatility

DFGR vs. RWO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dimensional Global Real Estate ETF (DFGR) is 4.22%, while SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ETF (RWO) has a volatility of 4.59%. This indicates that DFGR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RWO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DFGR	RWO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.22%	4.59%	-0.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.34%	9.89%	-0.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.29%	13.14%	-0.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.42%	17.06%	-1.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.42%	18.21%	-2.79%

DFGR vs. RWO - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFGR has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than RWO's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

DFGR vs. RWO - Dividend Comparison

DFGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.85%, more than RWO's 3.24% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DFGR Dimensional Global Real Estate ETF	3.85%	4.05%	3.73%	2.77%	0.59%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RWO SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ETF	3.24%	3.62%	3.68%	3.53%	3.69%	2.79%	3.25%	3.97%	3.90%	3.26%	3.77%	2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DFGR and RWO in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, DFGR and RWO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, DFGR or RWO?

RWO has higher volatility (4.59%) compared to DFGR (4.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFGR dropped -21.28% vs RWO's -67.69%.

Which ETF is better, DFGR or RWO?

On 3-year performance, RWO leads with 11.85% vs 11.14% for DFGR. On fees, DFGR is cheaper at 0.22% per year. On volatility, DFGR has been the lower-risk option at 4.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DFGR or RWO?

Over the 3-year period, RWO has performed better with a 11.85% return vs 11.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DFGR or RWO?

DFGR is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for RWO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DFGR or RWO?

DFGR has the higher dividend yield at 3.85%, compared with 3.24% for RWO.

What is the main difference between DFGR and RWO?

They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for DFGR and 0.50% for RWO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RWO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.14 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.