DFGP vs. DFAU

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DFGP (Dimensional Global Core Plus Fixed Income ETF) and DFAU (Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DFGP is a Global Bonds fund actively managed by Dimensional, while DFAU is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, DFGP returned 5.12% vs 28.49% for DFAU. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DFGP charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for DFAU.

Performance

DFGP vs. DFAU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional Global Core Plus Fixed Income ETF (DFGP) and Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF (DFAU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFGP achieves a 1.11% return, which is significantly lower than DFAU's 11.32% return.

DFGP

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: 0.77%
• YTD: 1.11%
• 6M: 0.81%
• 1Y: 5.12%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DFAU

• 1D: -0.67%
• 1M: 4.93%
• YTD: 11.32%
• 6M: 11.27%
• 1Y: 28.49%
• 3Y*: 21.70%
• 5Y*: 13.05%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFGP vs. DFAU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
DFGP Dimensional Global Core Plus Fixed Income ETF	1.11%	5.89%	3.71%	6.24%
DFAU Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF	11.32%	16.78%	23.17%	10.11%

Correlation

The correlation between DFGP and DFAU is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.42
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2023	0.29

The correlation between DFGP and DFAU shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (all time) to 0.42 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

DFGP vs. DFAU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFGP

DFGP Risk / Return Rank: 35
DFGP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
DFGP Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
DFGP Omega Ratio Rank: 34
DFGP Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
DFGP Martin Ratio Rank: 35

DFAU

DFAU Risk / Return Rank: 71
DFAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
DFAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
DFAU Omega Ratio Rank: 70
DFAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
DFAU Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFGP vs. DFAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Global Core Plus Fixed Income ETF (DFGP) and Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF (DFAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DFGP	DFAU	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.30	2.38	-1.08
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.87	3.24	-1.37
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.43	-0.19
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.59	3.30	-1.71
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.41	15.10	-9.69
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DFGP vs. DFAU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFGP Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is lower than the DFAU Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFGP and DFAU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DFGP	DFAU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.30	2.38	-1.08
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.77	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.44	0.94	+0.50

Drawdowns

DFGP vs. DFAU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFGP drawdown since its inception was -3.24%, smaller than the maximum DFAU drawdown of -23.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFGP and DFAU.

Drawdown Indicators

	DFGP	DFAU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.24%	-23.61%	+20.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.24%	-8.67%	+5.43%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.36%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-23.61%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.94%	-0.67%	-0.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.78%	-4.99%	+4.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.95%	1.89%	-0.94%

Volatility

DFGP vs. DFAU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dimensional Global Core Plus Fixed Income ETF (DFGP) is 1.65%, while Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF (DFAU) has a volatility of 2.95%. This indicates that DFGP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DFGP	DFAU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.65%	2.95%	-1.30%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.25%	9.04%	-5.79%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.96%	12.06%	-8.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.66%	17.02%	-12.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.66%	16.73%	-12.07%

DFGP vs. DFAU - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFGP has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than DFAU's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

DFGP vs. DFAU - Dividend Comparison

DFGP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.64%, more than DFAU's 0.90% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
DFAU Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF	0.90%	0.95%	1.10%	1.29%	1.40%	1.00%	0.13%
DFGP Dimensional Global Core Plus Fixed Income ETF	3.64%	3.45%	4.51%	0.62%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DFGP and DFAU in my portfolio?

DFGP and DFAU have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DFGP or DFAU?

DFAU has higher volatility (2.95%) compared to DFGP (1.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFGP dropped -3.24% vs DFAU's -23.61%.

Which ETF is better, DFGP or DFAU?

On 1-year performance, DFAU leads with 28.49% vs 5.12% for DFGP. On fees, DFAU is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, DFGP has been the lower-risk option at 1.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DFGP or DFAU?

Over the 1-year period, DFAU has performed better with a 28.49% return vs 5.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DFGP or DFAU?

DFAU is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for DFGP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DFGP or DFAU?

DFGP has the higher dividend yield at 3.64%, compared with 0.90% for DFAU.

What is the main difference between DFGP and DFAU?

DFGP is categorized as Global Bonds, while DFAU is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for DFGP and 0.12% for DFAU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DFAU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.