DFGBX vs. BNDW

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

DFGBX (DFA Five Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio) and BNDW (Vanguard Total World Bond ETF) are both Global Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, DFGBX returned 1.20%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for BNDW. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DFGBX charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for BNDW.

Performance

DFGBX vs. BNDW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA Five Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio (DFGBX) and Vanguard Total World Bond ETF (BNDW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFGBX achieves a 1.15% return, which is significantly higher than BNDW's 0.15% return.

DFGBX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.30%
• YTD: 1.15%
• 6M: 1.53%
• 1Y: 2.38%
• 3Y*: 4.19%
• 5Y*: 1.20%
• 10Y*: 1.27%

BNDW

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: -0.41%
• YTD: 0.15%
• 6M: 0.41%
• 1Y: 3.40%
• 3Y*: 3.95%
• 5Y*: 0.10%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFGBX vs. BNDW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
DFGBX DFA Five Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio	1.15%	3.13%	5.37%	5.00%	-6.63%	-1.03%	1.52%	4.04%	0.93%
BNDW Vanguard Total World Bond ETF	0.15%	5.02%	2.42%	7.18%	-12.88%	-2.10%	6.22%	8.37%	1.21%

Correlation

The correlation between DFGBX and BNDW is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.53
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.26
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.54
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 2018	0.52

The correlation between DFGBX and BNDW shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (3 years) to 0.54 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

DFGBX vs. BNDW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFGBX

DFGBX Risk / Return Rank: 28
DFGBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
DFGBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
DFGBX Omega Ratio Rank: 52
DFGBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
DFGBX Martin Ratio Rank: 20

BNDW

BNDW Risk / Return Rank: 29
BNDW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
BNDW Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
BNDW Omega Ratio Rank: 29
BNDW Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
BNDW Martin Ratio Rank: 27

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFGBX vs. BNDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA Five Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio (DFGBX) and Vanguard Total World Bond ETF (BNDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DFGBX	BNDW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.28	1.02	+0.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.61	1.46	+0.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.18	+0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.75	1.26	+0.48
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.74	3.52	+1.22
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DFGBX vs. BNDW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFGBX Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is comparable to the BNDW Sharpe Ratio of 1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFGBX and BNDW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DFGBX	BNDW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.28	1.02	+0.26
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.55	0.02	+0.53
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.66	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.74	0.37	+0.37

Drawdowns

DFGBX vs. BNDW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFGBX drawdown since its inception was -9.63%, smaller than the maximum BNDW drawdown of -17.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFGBX and BNDW.

Drawdown Indicators

	DFGBX	BNDW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.63%	-17.22%	+7.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.38%	-2.70%	+1.32%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-1.67%	-4.27%	+2.60%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-9.63%	-16.93%	+7.30%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-9.63%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.20%	-1.80%	+1.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.93%	-4.97%	+4.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.50%	0.97%	-0.47%

Volatility

DFGBX vs. BNDW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DFA Five Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio (DFGBX) is 0.50%, while Vanguard Total World Bond ETF (BNDW) has a volatility of 1.25%. This indicates that DFGBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNDW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DFGBX	BNDW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.50%	1.25%	-0.75%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.31%	2.64%	-1.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.88%	3.34%	-1.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.20%	5.21%	-3.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.93%	4.90%	-2.97%

DFGBX vs. BNDW - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFGBX has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is higher than BNDW's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

DFGBX vs. BNDW - Dividend Comparison

DFGBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.43%, less than BNDW's 4.23% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BNDW Vanguard Total World Bond ETF	4.23%	4.12%	3.90%	3.73%	2.02%	2.58%	1.56%	3.05%	1.66%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
DFGBX DFA Five Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio	3.43%	2.91%	4.69%	3.61%	1.63%	0.73%	0.03%	2.30%	4.74%	0.89%	1.16%	1.72%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DFGBX and BNDW in my portfolio?

DFGBX and BNDW have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DFGBX or BNDW?

BNDW has higher volatility (1.25%) compared to DFGBX (0.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFGBX dropped -9.63% vs BNDW's -17.22%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DFGBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.28 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.