DFEN vs. NUKZ

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

DFEN (Direxion Daily Aerospace & Defense Bull 3X Shares) and NUKZ (Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DFEN is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Select Aerospace & Defense Index (300%), while NUKZ is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Range Nuclear Renaissance Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, DFEN returned 76.99% vs 27.91% for NUKZ. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DFEN charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for NUKZ.

Performance

DFEN vs. NUKZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Aerospace & Defense Bull 3X Shares (DFEN) and Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFEN achieves a 13.12% return, which is significantly higher than NUKZ's 7.57% return.

DFEN

• 1D: -2.71%
• 1M: 7.74%
• YTD: 13.12%
• 6M: 20.44%
• 1Y: 76.99%
• 3Y*: 64.38%
• 5Y*: 29.22%
• 10Y*: —

NUKZ

• 1D: 1.59%
• 1M: -5.07%
• YTD: 7.57%
• 6M: 4.81%
• 1Y: 27.91%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFEN vs. NUKZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
DFEN Direxion Daily Aerospace & Defense Bull 3X Shares	13.12%	156.62%	42.23%
NUKZ Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF	7.57%	56.57%	60.11%

Correlation

The correlation between DFEN and NUKZ is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.61
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2024	0.57

The correlation between DFEN and NUKZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

DFEN vs. NUKZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DFEN	NUKZ
Industrials	19.7%	45.9%
Technology	0.0%	1.4%
Basic Materials	-	4.0%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	12.9%
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	35.8%

Return for Risk

DFEN vs. NUKZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFEN

DFEN Risk / Return Rank: 38
DFEN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
DFEN Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
DFEN Omega Ratio Rank: 36
DFEN Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
DFEN Martin Ratio Rank: 33

NUKZ

NUKZ Risk / Return Rank: 31
NUKZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
NUKZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
NUKZ Omega Ratio Rank: 27
NUKZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
NUKZ Martin Ratio Rank: 32

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFEN vs. NUKZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Aerospace & Defense Bull 3X Shares (DFEN) and Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DFEN	NUKZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.18	0.92	+0.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.85	1.43	+0.42
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.17	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.85	1.70	+0.15
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.29	4.11	+0.18

DFEN vs. NUKZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFEN Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is comparable to the NUKZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFEN and NUKZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DFEN vs. NUKZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFEN drawdown since its inception was -91.36%, which is greater than NUKZ's maximum drawdown of -33.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFEN and NUKZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	DFEN	NUKZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-91.36%	-33.03%	-58.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-41.75%	-16.51%	-25.24%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-43.13%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-55.30%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-25.87%	-10.39%	-15.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-45.20%	-6.06%	-39.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	17.99%	6.80%	+11.19%

Volatility

DFEN vs. NUKZ - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily Aerospace & Defense Bull 3X Shares (DFEN) has a higher volatility of 27.31% compared to Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ) at 11.24%. This indicates that DFEN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NUKZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DFEN	NUKZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	27.31%	11.24%	+16.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	55.81%	23.34%	+32.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	65.81%	30.46%	+35.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	60.74%	32.94%	+27.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	71.66%	32.94%	+38.72%

DFEN vs. NUKZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFEN has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than NUKZ's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

DFEN vs. NUKZ - Dividend Comparison

DFEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.89%, more than NUKZ's 0.85% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DFEN Direxion Daily Aerospace & Defense Bull 3X Shares	7.89%	8.89%	14.12%	1.13%	0.46%	1.89%	0.48%	0.50%	1.07%	1.50%
NUKZ Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF	0.85%	0.91%	0.09%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DFEN and NUKZ in my portfolio?

DFEN and NUKZ have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DFEN or NUKZ?

DFEN has higher volatility (27.31%) compared to NUKZ (11.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFEN dropped -91.36% vs NUKZ's -33.03%.

Which ETF is better, DFEN or NUKZ?

On 1-year performance, DFEN leads with 76.99% vs 27.91% for NUKZ. On fees, NUKZ is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, NUKZ has been the lower-risk option at 11.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DFEN or NUKZ?

Over the 1-year period, DFEN has performed better with a 76.99% return vs 27.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DFEN or NUKZ?

NUKZ is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for DFEN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DFEN or NUKZ?

DFEN has the higher dividend yield at 7.89%, compared with 0.85% for NUKZ.

What is the main difference between DFEN and NUKZ?

DFEN is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while NUKZ is Energy Equities. DFEN tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Aerospace & Defense Index (300%), while NUKZ tracks Range Nuclear Renaissance Index. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for DFEN and 0.85% for NUKZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DFEN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.18 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.