DFDV vs. VRT

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

DFDV (DeFi Development Corp) and VRT (Vertiv Holdings Co.) are both stocks. DFDV operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology), while VRT operates in Electrical Equipment & Parts (Industrials). Over the past year, DFDV returned -89.20% vs 164.84% for VRT. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

DFDV vs. VRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DeFi Development Corp (DFDV) and Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFDV achieves a -38.61% return, which is significantly lower than VRT's 86.99% return.

DFDV

• 1D: 5.08%
• 1M: -33.33%
• YTD: -38.61%
• 6M: -44.24%
• 1Y: -89.20%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VRT

• 1D: 1.68%
• 1M: -18.14%
• YTD: 86.99%
• 6M: 87.85%
• 1Y: 164.84%
• 3Y*: 138.33%
• 5Y*: 63.29%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFDV vs. VRT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
DFDV DeFi Development Corp	-38.61%	700.93%	-41.08%	-74.25%
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co.	86.99%	42.80%	136.82%	86.41%

Correlation

The correlation between DFDV and VRT is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.20
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2023	0.15

Fundamentals

Market Cap DFDV : $81.40M VRT : $118.76B
EPS DFDV : -$6.55 VRT : $3.99
PS Ratio DFDV : 5.38 VRT : 10.92
PB Ratio DFDV : 7.99 VRT : 27.98
Total Revenue (TTM) DFDV : $13.76M VRT : $10.84B
Gross Profit (TTM) DFDV : $13.42M VRT : $3.92B
EBITDA (TTM) DFDV : -$117.94M VRT : $2.35B

Return for Risk

DFDV vs. VRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFDV

DFDV Risk / Return Rank: 9
DFDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
DFDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
DFDV Omega Ratio Rank: 9
DFDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
DFDV Martin Ratio Rank: 13

VRT

VRT Risk / Return Rank: 94
VRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
VRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
VRT Omega Ratio Rank: 91
VRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
VRT Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFDV vs. VRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DeFi Development Corp (DFDV) and Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DFDV	VRT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.69	2.85	-3.54
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.53	3.34	-4.88
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.84	1.41	-0.58
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.98	6.55	-7.54
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.28	17.79	-19.07

DFDV vs. VRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFDV Sharpe Ratio is -0.69, which is lower than the VRT Sharpe Ratio of 2.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFDV and VRT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DFDV vs. VRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFDV drawdown since its inception was -93.13%, which is greater than VRT's maximum drawdown of -71.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFDV and VRT.

Drawdown Indicators

	DFDV	VRT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-93.13%	-71.24%	-21.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-90.66%	-25.32%	-65.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-61.28%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-71.24%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-91.98%	-19.50%	-72.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-72.84%	-16.23%	-56.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	70.13%	9.30%	+60.83%

Volatility

DFDV vs. VRT - Volatility Comparison

DeFi Development Corp (DFDV) has a higher volatility of 28.47% compared to Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) at 16.12%. This indicates that DFDV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DFDV	VRT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	28.47%	16.12%	+12.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	84.19%	45.82%	+38.37%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	131.72%	58.29%	+73.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	518.02%	61.88%	+456.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	518.02%	54.61%	+463.41%

Dividends

DFDV vs. VRT - Dividend Comparison

DFDV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
DFDV DeFi Development Corp	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co.	0.07%	0.11%	0.10%	0.05%	0.07%	0.04%	0.05%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DFDV and VRT in my portfolio?

DFDV and VRT have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DFDV or VRT?

DFDV has higher volatility (28.47%) compared to VRT (16.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFDV dropped -93.13% vs VRT's -71.24%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.85 vs -0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.