DFCFX vs. SEACX
Compare and contrast key facts about DFA Two-Year Fixed Income Portfolio (DFCFX) and Crossmark Steward Select Bond Fund (SEACX).
DFCFX is managed by Dimensional. It was launched on Jun 6, 1996. SEACX is managed by Crossmark Steward Funds. It was launched on Oct 1, 2004.
Performance
DFCFX vs. SEACX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DFCFX vs. SEACX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFCFX DFA Two-Year Fixed Income Portfolio | 0.89% | 2.28% | 5.33% | 4.92% | -3.28% | 8.60% | 0.57% | 2.65% | 1.78% | 0.92% |
SEACX Crossmark Steward Select Bond Fund | -0.67% | 6.50% | 1.43% | 5.54% | -11.55% | -2.01% | 4.97% | 6.96% | -0.12% | 2.24% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFCFX achieves a 0.89% return, which is significantly higher than SEACX's -0.67% return. Over the past 10 years, DFCFX has outperformed SEACX with an annualized return of 2.44%, while SEACX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.15% annualized return.
DFCFX
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- YTD
- 0.89%
- 6M
- 1.87%
- 1Y
- 3.08%
- 3Y*
- 4.06%
- 5Y*
- 3.68%
- 10Y*
- 2.44%
SEACX
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- -2.10%
- YTD
- -0.67%
- 6M
- 0.19%
- 1Y
- 3.84%
- 3Y*
- 3.33%
- 5Y*
- 0.22%
- 10Y*
- 1.15%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DFCFX vs. SEACX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFCFX has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is lower than SEACX's 0.72% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DFCFX vs. SEACX — Risk / Return Rank
DFCFX
SEACX
DFCFX vs. SEACX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA Two-Year Fixed Income Portfolio (DFCFX) and Crossmark Steward Select Bond Fund (SEACX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFCFX | SEACX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.59 | 1.00 | +1.59 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.98 | 1.44 | +1.54 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 3.80 | 1.17 | +2.63 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.07 | 1.73 | +0.34 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.56 | 5.83 | -0.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFCFX | SEACX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.59 | 1.00 | +1.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 | 0.05 | +0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.78 | 0.30 | +0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.34 | 0.66 | +0.68 |
Correlation
The correlation between DFCFX and SEACX is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
DFCFX vs. SEACX - Dividend Comparison
DFCFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.94%, less than SEACX's 3.36% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFCFX DFA Two-Year Fixed Income Portfolio | 2.94% | 2.16% | 4.90% | 3.43% | 1.32% | 8.29% | 0.67% | 2.22% | 1.87% | 1.22% | 0.79% | 0.53% |
SEACX Crossmark Steward Select Bond Fund | 3.36% | 2.72% | 2.78% | 2.06% | 1.67% | 1.41% | 1.86% | 2.26% | 2.22% | 1.98% | 2.18% | 2.30% |
Drawdowns
DFCFX vs. SEACX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFCFX drawdown since its inception was -4.27%, smaller than the maximum SEACX drawdown of -16.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFCFX and SEACX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFCFX | SEACX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.27% | -16.96% | +12.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.03% | -2.62% | +1.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -4.27% | -16.34% | +12.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -4.27% | -16.96% | +12.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.17% | +2.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.26% | -2.41% | +2.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.38% | 0.78% | -0.40% |
Volatility
DFCFX vs. SEACX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for DFA Two-Year Fixed Income Portfolio (DFCFX) is 0.15%, while Crossmark Steward Select Bond Fund (SEACX) has a volatility of 1.62%. This indicates that DFCFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SEACX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DFCFX | SEACX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.15% | 1.62% | -1.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.43% | 2.52% | -2.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.21% | 4.11% | -2.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.39% | 4.82% | -0.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.13% | 3.88% | -0.75% |