PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
DFCFX vs. DFAW
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between DFCFX and DFAW is 0.05, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.0

Performance

DFCFX vs. DFAW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA Two-Year Fixed Income Portfolio (DFCFX) and Dimensional World Equity ETF (DFAW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-4.00%-2.00%0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
2.39%
3.68%
DFCFX
DFAW

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

DFCFX:

7.95

DFAW:

1.37

Sortino Ratio

DFCFX:

148.12

DFAW:

1.88

Omega Ratio

DFCFX:

98.92

DFAW:

1.25

Calmar Ratio

DFCFX:

168.38

DFAW:

2.07

Martin Ratio

DFCFX:

2,058.75

DFAW:

7.39

Ulcer Index

DFCFX:

0.00%

DFAW:

2.22%

Daily Std Dev

DFCFX:

0.66%

DFAW:

12.02%

Max Drawdown

DFCFX:

-4.64%

DFAW:

-7.94%

Current Drawdown

DFCFX:

0.00%

DFAW:

-2.03%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFCFX achieves a 0.62% return, which is significantly lower than DFAW's 2.73% return.


DFCFX

YTD

0.62%

1M

0.31%

6M

2.39%

1Y

5.10%

5Y*

1.46%

10Y*

1.37%

DFAW

YTD

2.73%

1M

-0.42%

6M

3.68%

1Y

14.54%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DFCFX vs. DFAW - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFCFX has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is lower than DFAW's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


DFAW
Dimensional World Equity ETF
Expense ratio chart for DFAW: current value at 0.25% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.25%
Expense ratio chart for DFCFX: current value at 0.21% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.21%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

DFCFX vs. DFAW — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFCFX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of DFCFX is 100100
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of DFCFX is 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of DFCFX is 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of DFCFX is 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of DFCFX is 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of DFCFX is 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

DFAW
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of DFAW is 6060
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of DFAW is 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of DFAW is 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of DFAW is 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of DFAW is 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of DFAW is 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

DFCFX vs. DFAW - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA Two-Year Fixed Income Portfolio (DFCFX) and Dimensional World Equity ETF (DFAW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for DFCFX, currently valued at 7.95, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.007.951.37
The chart of Sortino ratio for DFCFX, currently valued at 148.12, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00148.121.88
The chart of Omega ratio for DFCFX, currently valued at 98.92, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.0098.921.25
The chart of Calmar ratio for DFCFX, currently valued at 168.38, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.00168.382.07
The chart of Martin ratio for DFCFX, currently valued at 2058.75, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.002,058.757.39
DFCFX
DFAW

The current DFCFX Sharpe Ratio is 7.95, which is higher than the DFAW Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFCFX and DFAW, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio2.004.006.008.00Oct 06Oct 13Oct 20Oct 27Nov 03Nov 10Nov 17Nov 24DecemberDec 08Dec 15Dec 22Dec 29Jan 05Jan 12Jan 19Jan 26Feb 02Feb 09Feb 16
7.95
1.37
DFCFX
DFAW

Dividends

DFCFX vs. DFAW - Dividend Comparison

DFCFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.87%, more than DFAW's 1.43% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
DFCFX
DFA Two-Year Fixed Income Portfolio
4.87%4.90%3.43%1.32%0.02%0.66%2.23%1.86%1.22%0.79%0.49%0.20%
DFAW
Dimensional World Equity ETF
1.43%1.47%0.42%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

DFCFX vs. DFAW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFCFX drawdown since its inception was -4.64%, smaller than the maximum DFAW drawdown of -7.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFCFX and DFAW. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-6.00%-5.00%-4.00%-3.00%-2.00%-1.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February0
-2.03%
DFCFX
DFAW

Volatility

DFCFX vs. DFAW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DFA Two-Year Fixed Income Portfolio (DFCFX) is 0.17%, while Dimensional World Equity ETF (DFAW) has a volatility of 3.26%. This indicates that DFCFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFAW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
0.17%
3.26%
DFCFX
DFAW
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab