DFCF vs. UGA

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

DFCF (Dimensional Core Fixed Income ETF) and UGA (United States Gasoline Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - DFCF is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by Dimensional, while UGA is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. DFCF is actively managed, while UGA is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DFCF returned 4.86%/yr vs 22.29%/yr for UGA. At a correlation of -0.13, they often move in opposite directions. DFCF charges 0.17%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for UGA.

Performance

DFCF vs. UGA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional Core Fixed Income ETF (DFCF) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFCF achieves a 0.56% return, which is significantly lower than UGA's 75.83% return.

DFCF

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.24%
• YTD: 0.56%
• 6M: 0.61%
• 1Y: 5.90%
• 3Y*: 4.86%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

UGA

• 1D: 1.74%
• 1M: -8.95%
• YTD: 75.83%
• 6M: 64.53%
• 1Y: 82.09%
• 3Y*: 22.29%
• 5Y*: 25.18%
• 10Y*: 14.46%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFCF vs. UGA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
DFCF Dimensional Core Fixed Income ETF	0.56%	7.89%	1.86%	6.94%	-14.48%	0.23%
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP	75.83%	-2.00%	3.77%	1.27%	46.34%	-2.96%

Correlation

The correlation between DFCF and UGA is -0.42, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.42
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.21
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2021	-0.13

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between DFCF and UGA has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.13 to -0.42, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

Return for Risk

DFCF vs. UGA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFCF

DFCF Risk / Return Rank: 41
DFCF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
DFCF Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
DFCF Omega Ratio Rank: 40
DFCF Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
DFCF Martin Ratio Rank: 40

UGA

UGA Risk / Return Rank: 71
UGA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
UGA Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
UGA Omega Ratio Rank: 61
UGA Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
UGA Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFCF vs. UGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Core Fixed Income ETF (DFCF) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DFCF	UGA	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.49	2.35	-0.86
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.19	2.78	-0.59
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.38	-0.12
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.06	5.82	-3.76
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.31	14.25	-7.94
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DFCF vs. UGA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFCF Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is lower than the UGA Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFCF and UGA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DFCF	UGA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.49	2.35	-0.86
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.74	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.39	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.04	0.12	-0.08

Drawdowns

DFCF vs. UGA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFCF drawdown since its inception was -19.56%, smaller than the maximum UGA drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFCF and UGA.

Drawdown Indicators

	DFCF	UGA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.56%	-86.59%	+67.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.79%	-14.88%	+12.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.05%	-26.68%	+21.63%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-38.11%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-75.89%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.27%	-12.18%	+10.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.04%	-36.77%	+28.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.91%	6.08%	-5.17%

Volatility

DFCF vs. UGA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dimensional Core Fixed Income ETF (DFCF) is 1.38%, while United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA) has a volatility of 12.41%. This indicates that DFCF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UGA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DFCF	UGA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.38%	12.41%	-11.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.92%	30.41%	-27.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.98%	35.21%	-31.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.47%	34.38%	-27.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.47%	37.27%	-30.80%

DFCF vs. UGA - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFCF has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than UGA's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

DFCF vs. UGA - Dividend Comparison

DFCF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.30%, while UGA has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
DFCF Dimensional Core Fixed Income ETF	4.30%	4.48%	4.61%	4.51%	3.27%	0.16%
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DFCF and UGA in my portfolio?

DFCF and UGA have a correlation of -0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DFCF or UGA?

UGA has higher volatility (12.41%) compared to DFCF (1.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFCF dropped -19.56% vs UGA's -86.59%.

Which ETF is better, DFCF or UGA?

On 3-year performance, UGA leads with 22.29% vs 4.86% for DFCF. On fees, DFCF is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, DFCF has been the lower-risk option at 1.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DFCF or UGA?

Over the 3-year period, UGA has performed better with a 22.29% return vs 4.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DFCF or UGA?

DFCF is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UGA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DFCF or UGA?

DFCF has the higher dividend yield at 4.30%, compared with 0.00% for UGA.

What is the main difference between DFCF and UGA?

DFCF is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while UGA is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for DFCF and 0.75% for UGA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

UGA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.