DFAX vs. VEA
DFAX (Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF) and VEA (Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - DFAX tracks the MSCI All Country World ex USA Index while VEA tracks the FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DFAX returned 21.17%/yr vs 20.11%/yr for VEA. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. DFAX charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VEA.
Performance
DFAX vs. VEA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with DFAX having a 15.50% return and VEA slightly lower at 15.19%.
DFAX
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- 2.61%
- YTD
- 15.50%
- 6M
- 18.24%
- 1Y
- 34.48%
- 3Y*
- 21.17%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VEA
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- 4.15%
- YTD
- 15.19%
- 6M
- 18.13%
- 1Y
- 32.11%
- 3Y*
- 20.11%
- 5Y*
- 9.65%
- 10Y*
- 10.13%
DFAX vs. VEA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFAX Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF | 15.50% | 35.42% | 4.78% | 16.66% | -14.48% | -2.68% |
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | 15.19% | 35.16% | 3.15% | 17.93% | -15.34% | -1.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFAX and VEA is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2021 | 0.97 |
The correlation between DFAX and VEA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
DFAX vs. VEA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DFAX
VEA
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Healthcare
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Real Estate
Financial Services
DFAX
VEA
Industrials
DFAX
VEA
Basic Materials
DFAX
VEA
Technology
DFAX
VEA
Consumer Cyclical
DFAX
VEA
Energy
DFAX
VEA
Healthcare
DFAX
VEA
Utilities
DFAX
VEA
Consumer Defensive
DFAX
VEA
Communication Services
DFAX
VEA
Real Estate
DFAX
VEA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFAX vs. VEA — Risk / Return Rank
DFAX
VEA
DFAX vs. VEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAX) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFAX | VEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.37 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.12 | 2.77 | +0.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.33 | 10.82 | +1.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFAX | VEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.34 | 2.06 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.25 | +0.40 |
Drawdowns
DFAX vs. VEA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFAX drawdown since its inception was -28.15%, smaller than the maximum VEA drawdown of -60.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFAX and VEA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFAX | VEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.15% | -60.68% | +32.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.11% | -11.63% | +0.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.89% | -13.45% | -0.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.71% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.73% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.76% | -0.66% | -0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.67% | -13.29% | +6.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.80% | 2.98% | -0.18% |
Volatility
DFAX vs. VEA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAX) is 5.10%, while Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) has a volatility of 5.49%. This indicates that DFAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFAX | VEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.10% | 5.49% | -0.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.67% | 13.32% | -0.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.82% | 15.64% | -0.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.98% | 16.54% | -0.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.98% | 17.35% | -1.37% |
DFAX vs. VEA - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFAX has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than VEA's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
DFAX vs. VEA - Dividend Comparison
DFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.21%, less than VEA's 2.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFAX Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF | 2.21% | 2.58% | 2.98% | 3.01% | 3.30% | 1.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | 2.61% | 3.22% | 3.35% | 3.15% | 2.91% | 3.16% | 2.04% | 3.04% | 3.35% | 2.77% | 3.05% | 2.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, DFAX and VEA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VEA has higher volatility (5.49%) compared to DFAX (5.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFAX dropped -28.15% vs VEA's -60.68%.
On 3-year performance, DFAX leads with 21.17% vs 20.11% for VEA. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, DFAX has been the lower-risk option at 5.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DFAX has performed better with a 21.17% return vs 20.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for DFAX.
VEA has the higher dividend yield at 2.61%, compared with 2.21% for DFAX.
DFAX tracks MSCI All Country World ex USA Index, while VEA tracks FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index. They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for DFAX and 0.03% for VEA.
DFAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFAX and VEA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer