PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFAX vs. IXUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFAX vs. IXUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAX) and iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF (IXUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with DFAX having a 15.23% return and IXUS slightly lower at 14.51%.


DFAX

1D
-1.00%
1M
3.89%
YTD
15.23%
6M
18.11%
1Y
34.96%
3Y*
20.90%
5Y*
10Y*

IXUS

1D
-1.01%
1M
4.91%
YTD
14.51%
6M
17.16%
1Y
32.15%
3Y*
19.44%
5Y*
8.38%
10Y*
9.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFAX vs. IXUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
DFAX
Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF
15.23%35.42%4.78%16.66%-14.48%-2.68%
IXUS
iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF
14.51%32.40%5.19%15.83%-16.47%-2.72%

Correlation

The correlation between DFAX and IXUS is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2021

0.99

The correlation between DFAX and IXUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

DFAX vs. IXUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DFAX
IXUS

Financial Services

17.9%
22.4%

Industrials

16.1%
15.9%

Basic Materials

13.2%
7.6%

Technology

10.9%
18.0%

Consumer Cyclical

10.9%
8.3%

Energy

6.6%
5.2%

Healthcare

5.6%
7.1%

Utilities

4.2%
3.2%

Consumer Defensive

3.9%
5.1%

Communication Services

3.5%
4.8%

Real Estate

3.1%
2.5%

Financial Services

DFAX
17.9%
IXUS
22.4%

Industrials

DFAX
16.1%
IXUS
15.9%

Basic Materials

DFAX
13.2%
IXUS
7.6%

Technology

DFAX
10.9%
IXUS
18.0%

Consumer Cyclical

DFAX
10.9%
IXUS
8.3%

Energy

DFAX
6.6%
IXUS
5.2%

Healthcare

DFAX
5.6%
IXUS
7.1%

Utilities

DFAX
4.2%
IXUS
3.2%

Consumer Defensive

DFAX
3.9%
IXUS
5.1%

Communication Services

DFAX
3.5%
IXUS
4.8%

Real Estate

DFAX
3.1%
IXUS
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFAX vs. IXUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFAX
DFAX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
DFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
DFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

IXUS
IXUS Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
IXUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IXUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
IXUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
IXUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
IXUS Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFAX vs. IXUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAX) and iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF (IXUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFAXIXUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.39

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.16

2.84

+0.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.50

11.13

+1.37

DFAX vs. IXUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is comparable to the IXUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFAX and IXUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFAXIXUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.37

2.10

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.49

+0.15

Drawdowns

DFAX vs. IXUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFAX drawdown since its inception was -28.15%, smaller than the maximum IXUS drawdown of -36.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFAX and IXUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFAXIXUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.15%

-36.22%

+8.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.11%

-11.36%

+0.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.89%

-13.75%

-0.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.00%

-1.01%

+0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.67%

-7.50%

+0.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.80%

2.90%

-0.10%

Volatility

DFAX vs. IXUS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAX) is 5.27%, while iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF (IXUS) has a volatility of 5.64%. This indicates that DFAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IXUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFAXIXUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.27%

5.64%

-0.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.67%

13.16%

-0.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.83%

15.37%

-0.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.99%

16.21%

-0.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.99%

17.07%

-1.08%

DFAX vs. IXUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFAX has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than IXUS's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFAX vs. IXUS - Dividend Comparison

DFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.22%, less than IXUS's 2.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFAX
Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF
2.22%2.58%2.98%3.01%3.30%1.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IXUS
iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF
2.83%3.24%3.33%3.13%2.48%3.12%1.85%3.09%3.00%2.41%2.58%2.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, DFAX and IXUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

IXUS has higher volatility (5.64%) compared to DFAX (5.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFAX dropped -28.15% vs IXUS's -36.22%.

On 3-year performance, DFAX leads with 20.90% vs 19.44% for IXUS. On fees, IXUS is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, DFAX has been the lower-risk option at 5.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, DFAX has performed better with a 20.90% return vs 19.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IXUS is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for DFAX.

IXUS has the higher dividend yield at 2.83%, compared with 2.22% for DFAX.

DFAX tracks MSCI All Country World ex USA Index, while IXUS tracks MSCI ACWI ex USA IMI Index (Net). They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for DFAX and 0.07% for IXUS.

DFAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFAX and IXUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer