DFAX vs. IXUS
DFAX (Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF) and IXUS (iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - DFAX tracks the MSCI All Country World ex USA Index while IXUS tracks the MSCI ACWI ex USA IMI Index (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DFAX returned 20.90%/yr vs 19.44%/yr for IXUS. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. DFAX charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for IXUS.
Performance
DFAX vs. IXUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with DFAX having a 15.23% return and IXUS slightly lower at 14.51%.
DFAX
- 1D
- -1.00%
- 1M
- 3.89%
- YTD
- 15.23%
- 6M
- 18.11%
- 1Y
- 34.96%
- 3Y*
- 20.90%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IXUS
- 1D
- -1.01%
- 1M
- 4.91%
- YTD
- 14.51%
- 6M
- 17.16%
- 1Y
- 32.15%
- 3Y*
- 19.44%
- 5Y*
- 8.38%
- 10Y*
- 9.78%
DFAX vs. IXUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFAX Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF | 15.23% | 35.42% | 4.78% | 16.66% | -14.48% | -2.68% |
IXUS iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF | 14.51% | 32.40% | 5.19% | 15.83% | -16.47% | -2.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFAX and IXUS is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2021 | 0.99 |
The correlation between DFAX and IXUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
DFAX vs. IXUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DFAX
IXUS
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Healthcare
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Real Estate
Financial Services
DFAX
IXUS
Industrials
DFAX
IXUS
Basic Materials
DFAX
IXUS
Technology
DFAX
IXUS
Consumer Cyclical
DFAX
IXUS
Energy
DFAX
IXUS
Healthcare
DFAX
IXUS
Utilities
DFAX
IXUS
Consumer Defensive
DFAX
IXUS
Communication Services
DFAX
IXUS
Real Estate
DFAX
IXUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFAX vs. IXUS — Risk / Return Rank
DFAX
IXUS
DFAX vs. IXUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAX) and iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF (IXUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFAX | IXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.39 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.16 | 2.84 | +0.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.50 | 11.13 | +1.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFAX | IXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.37 | 2.10 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.52 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.49 | +0.15 |
Drawdowns
DFAX vs. IXUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFAX drawdown since its inception was -28.15%, smaller than the maximum IXUS drawdown of -36.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFAX and IXUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFAX | IXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.15% | -36.22% | +8.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.11% | -11.36% | +0.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.89% | -13.75% | -0.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -30.04% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.22% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.00% | -1.01% | +0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.67% | -7.50% | +0.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.80% | 2.90% | -0.10% |
Volatility
DFAX vs. IXUS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAX) is 5.27%, while iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF (IXUS) has a volatility of 5.64%. This indicates that DFAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IXUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFAX | IXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.27% | 5.64% | -0.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.67% | 13.16% | -0.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.83% | 15.37% | -0.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.99% | 16.21% | -0.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.99% | 17.07% | -1.08% |
DFAX vs. IXUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFAX has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than IXUS's 0.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
DFAX vs. IXUS - Dividend Comparison
DFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.22%, less than IXUS's 2.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFAX Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF | 2.22% | 2.58% | 2.98% | 3.01% | 3.30% | 1.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IXUS iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF | 2.83% | 3.24% | 3.33% | 3.13% | 2.48% | 3.12% | 1.85% | 3.09% | 3.00% | 2.41% | 2.58% | 2.81% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, DFAX and IXUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
IXUS has higher volatility (5.64%) compared to DFAX (5.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFAX dropped -28.15% vs IXUS's -36.22%.
On 3-year performance, DFAX leads with 20.90% vs 19.44% for IXUS. On fees, IXUS is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, DFAX has been the lower-risk option at 5.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DFAX has performed better with a 20.90% return vs 19.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IXUS is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for DFAX.
IXUS has the higher dividend yield at 2.83%, compared with 2.22% for DFAX.
DFAX tracks MSCI All Country World ex USA Index, while IXUS tracks MSCI ACWI ex USA IMI Index (Net). They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for DFAX and 0.07% for IXUS.
DFAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFAX and IXUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer