DFAU vs. DMAY
DFAU (Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF) and DMAY (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. DFAU is actively managed, while DMAY is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DFAU returned 13.38%/yr vs 7.26%/yr for DMAY. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DFAU charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for DMAY.
Performance
DFAU vs. DMAY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFAU achieves a 12.07% return, which is significantly higher than DMAY's 4.73% return.
DFAU
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- 5.21%
- YTD
- 12.07%
- 6M
- 12.52%
- 1Y
- 30.31%
- 3Y*
- 21.97%
- 5Y*
- 13.38%
- 10Y*
- —
DMAY
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 1.59%
- YTD
- 4.73%
- 6M
- 5.76%
- 1Y
- 12.97%
- 3Y*
- 12.07%
- 5Y*
- 7.26%
- 10Y*
- —
DFAU vs. DMAY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFAU Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF | 12.07% | 16.78% | 23.17% | 24.79% | -16.99% | 26.89% | 6.48% |
DMAY FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May | 4.73% | 11.05% | 12.82% | 15.40% | -9.98% | 6.14% | 0.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFAU and DMAY is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2020 | 0.90 |
The correlation between DFAU and DMAY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
DFAU vs. DMAY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DFAU
DMAY
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
DFAU
DMAY
Financial Services
DFAU
DMAY
Consumer Cyclical
DFAU
DMAY
Industrials
DFAU
DMAY
Communication Services
DFAU
DMAY
Healthcare
DFAU
DMAY
Consumer Defensive
DFAU
DMAY
Energy
DFAU
DMAY
Utilities
DFAU
DMAY
Basic Materials
DFAU
DMAY
Real Estate
DFAU
DMAY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFAU vs. DMAY — Risk / Return Rank
DFAU
DMAY
DFAU vs. DMAY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF (DFAU) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May (DMAY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFAU | DMAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.53 | 2.79 | -0.26 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.43 | 4.20 | -0.77 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.63 | -0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.56 | 4.06 | -0.49 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.33 | 24.92 | -8.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFAU | DMAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.53 | 2.79 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 | 0.81 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.95 | 0.88 | +0.07 |
Drawdowns
DFAU vs. DMAY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFAU drawdown since its inception was -23.61%, which is greater than DMAY's maximum drawdown of -13.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFAU and DMAY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFAU | DMAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.61% | -13.90% | -9.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.67% | -3.36% | -5.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.36% | -12.38% | -6.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.61% | -13.90% | -9.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.99% | -2.24% | -2.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.89% | 0.55% | +1.34% |
Volatility
DFAU vs. DMAY - Volatility Comparison
Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF (DFAU) has a higher volatility of 2.88% compared to FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May (DMAY) at 0.76%. This indicates that DFAU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DMAY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFAU | DMAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.88% | 0.76% | +2.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.02% | 3.73% | +5.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.04% | 4.71% | +7.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.02% | 9.02% | +8.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.74% | 8.43% | +8.31% |
DFAU vs. DMAY - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFAU has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than DMAY's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
DFAU vs. DMAY - Dividend Comparison
DFAU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, while DMAY has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFAU Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF | 0.89% | 0.95% | 1.10% | 1.29% | 1.40% | 1.00% | 0.13% |
DMAY FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, DFAU and DMAY move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
DFAU has higher volatility (2.88%) compared to DMAY (0.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFAU dropped -23.61% vs DMAY's -13.90%.
On 5-year performance, DFAU leads with 13.38% vs 7.26% for DMAY. On fees, DFAU is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, DMAY has been the lower-risk option at 0.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DFAU has performed better with a 13.38% return vs 7.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DFAU is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DMAY.
DFAU has the higher dividend yield at 0.89%, compared with 0.00% for DMAY.
They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for DFAU and 0.85% for DMAY.
DMAY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 2.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFAU and DMAY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer