PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFAU vs. DFSV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFAU vs. DFSV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF (DFAU) and Dimensional US Small Cap Value ETF (DFSV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFAU achieves a 12.63% return, which is significantly lower than DFSV's 22.89% return.


DFAU

1D
1.31%
1M
1.79%
6M
9.88%
YTD
12.63%
1Y
24.32%
3Y*
20.07%
5Y*
12.66%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
15.12%

DFSV

1D
1.21%
1M
3.80%
6M
13.69%
YTD
22.89%
1Y
39.62%
3Y*
15.33%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$29.77M$29.67M$32.10M
$29.27M$28.67M$35.45M

DFAU vs. DFSV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
DFAU
Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF
12.63%16.78%23.17%24.79%-7.04%
DFSV
Dimensional US Small Cap Value ETF
22.89%8.59%7.13%19.26%2.68%

Correlation

The correlation between DFAU and DFSV is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2022

0.80

The correlation between DFAU and DFSV shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.80 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DFAU vs. DFSV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DFAU
DFSV

Technology

39.8%
7.8%

Financial Services

14.2%
28.5%

Consumer Cyclical

10.4%
14.9%

Industrials

9.0%
16.1%

Communication Services

7.4%
2.6%

Healthcare

7.4%
7.3%

Consumer Defensive

3.9%
5.6%

Energy

3.2%
11.1%

Utilities

2.4%
0.6%

Basic Materials

2.2%
4.7%

Real Estate

0.2%
0.9%

Technology

DFAU
39.8%
DFSV
7.8%

Financial Services

DFAU
14.2%
DFSV
28.5%

Consumer Cyclical

DFAU
10.4%
DFSV
14.9%

Industrials

DFAU
9.0%
DFSV
16.1%

Communication Services

DFAU
7.4%
DFSV
2.6%

Healthcare

DFAU
7.4%
DFSV
7.3%

Consumer Defensive

DFAU
3.9%
DFSV
5.6%

Energy

DFAU
3.2%
DFSV
11.1%

Utilities

DFAU
2.4%
DFSV
0.6%

Basic Materials

DFAU
2.2%
DFSV
4.7%

Real Estate

DFAU
0.2%
DFSV
0.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFAU vs. DFSV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DFAU
DFAU Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
DFAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFAU Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
DFAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFAU Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

DFSV
DFSV Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
DFSV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFSV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFSV Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
DFSV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFSV Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DFAU vs. DFSV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF (DFAU) and Dimensional US Small Cap Value ETF (DFSV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DFAUDFSVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.43

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.82

4.24

-1.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.20

14.25

-2.05

DFAU vs. DFSV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFAU Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is comparable to the DFSV Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFAU and DFSV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DFAU vs. DFSV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFAU drawdown since its inception was -23.61%, smaller than the maximum DFSV drawdown of -28.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFAU and DFSV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFAUDFSVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.61%

-28.02%

+4.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.67%

-9.39%

+0.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.36%

-28.02%

+8.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.88%

-6.48%

+1.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.00%

2.79%

-0.79%

Volatility

DFAU vs. DFSV - Volatility Comparison

Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF (DFAU) and Dimensional US Small Cap Value ETF (DFSV) have volatilities of 3.63% and 3.55%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFAUDFSVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.63%

3.55%

+0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.12%

10.57%

-0.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.89%

16.74%

-3.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.12%

21.98%

-4.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.69%

21.98%

-5.29%

DFAU vs. DFSV - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFAU has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than DFSV's 0.31% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFAU vs. DFSV - Dividend Comparison

DFAU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, less than DFSV's 1.33% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
DFAU
Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF
0.90%0.95%1.10%1.29%1.40%1.00%0.13%
DFSV
Dimensional US Small Cap Value ETF
1.33%1.53%1.31%1.29%0.90%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFAU and DFSV have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DFAU has higher volatility (3.63%) compared to DFSV (3.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFAU dropped -23.61% vs DFSV's -28.02%.

On 3-year performance, DFAU leads with 20.07% vs 15.33% for DFSV. On fees, DFAU is cheaper at 0.12% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, DFAU has performed better with a 20.07% return vs 15.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DFAU is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.31% for DFSV.

DFSV has the higher dividend yield at 1.33%, compared with 0.90% for DFAU.

DFAU is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while DFSV is Small Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for DFAU and 0.31% for DFSV.

DFSV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFAU and DFSV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer