PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFAS vs. SPSM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFAS vs. SPSM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF (DFAS) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF (SPSM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFAS achieves a 12.81% return, which is significantly lower than SPSM's 15.28% return.


DFAS

1D
-0.81%
1M
2.19%
YTD
12.81%
6M
12.10%
1Y
27.65%
3Y*
15.22%
5Y*
10Y*

SPSM

1D
-0.92%
1M
1.62%
YTD
15.28%
6M
14.19%
1Y
31.50%
3Y*
14.42%
5Y*
5.71%
10Y*
10.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFAS vs. SPSM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
DFAS
Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF
12.81%8.17%10.21%17.83%-13.84%4.94%
SPSM
SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF
15.28%6.11%8.55%16.11%-16.12%1.73%

Correlation

The correlation between DFAS and SPSM is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2021

0.99

The correlation between DFAS and SPSM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

DFAS vs. SPSM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DFAS
SPSM

Financial Services

19.5%
16.9%

Industrials

18.6%
15.5%

Technology

15.0%
15.5%

Consumer Cyclical

11.9%
13.4%

Healthcare

11.0%
11.0%

Energy

6.7%
5.9%

Basic Materials

5.6%
5.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.3%
3.5%

Utilities

3.8%
2.0%

Communication Services

2.8%
3.6%

Real Estate

0.2%
7.7%

Financial Services

DFAS
19.5%
SPSM
16.9%

Industrials

DFAS
18.6%
SPSM
15.5%

Technology

DFAS
15.0%
SPSM
15.5%

Consumer Cyclical

DFAS
11.9%
SPSM
13.4%

Healthcare

DFAS
11.0%
SPSM
11.0%

Energy

DFAS
6.7%
SPSM
5.9%

Basic Materials

DFAS
5.6%
SPSM
5.1%

Consumer Defensive

DFAS
4.3%
SPSM
3.5%

Utilities

DFAS
3.8%
SPSM
2.0%

Communication Services

DFAS
2.8%
SPSM
3.6%

Real Estate

DFAS
0.2%
SPSM
7.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFAS vs. SPSM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFAS
DFAS Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
DFAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFAS Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
DFAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFAS Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

SPSM
SPSM Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
SPSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPSM Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
SPSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPSM Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFAS vs. SPSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF (DFAS) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF (SPSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFASSPSMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.32

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.97

3.63

-0.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.17

12.14

-1.97

DFAS vs. SPSM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFAS Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is comparable to the SPSM Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFAS and SPSM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFASSPSMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.66

1.82

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.45

-0.09

Drawdowns

DFAS vs. SPSM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFAS drawdown since its inception was -26.13%, smaller than the maximum SPSM drawdown of -42.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFAS and SPSM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFASSPSMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.13%

-42.89%

+16.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.36%

-8.72%

-0.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.13%

-27.94%

+1.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.81%

-0.97%

+0.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.31%

-7.93%

-0.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.73%

2.60%

+0.13%

Volatility

DFAS vs. SPSM - Volatility Comparison

Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF (DFAS) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF (SPSM) have volatilities of 4.31% and 4.44%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFASSPSMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.31%

4.44%

-0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.58%

11.64%

-0.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.77%

17.47%

-0.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.84%

21.43%

-0.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.84%

22.99%

-2.15%

DFAS vs. SPSM - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFAS has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than SPSM's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFAS vs. SPSM - Dividend Comparison

DFAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, less than SPSM's 1.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFAS
Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF
0.92%0.99%0.93%1.00%1.03%2.87%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPSM
SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF
1.43%1.62%1.85%1.61%1.38%1.40%1.34%1.58%1.82%1.51%1.49%2.37%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, DFAS and SPSM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SPSM has higher volatility (4.44%) compared to DFAS (4.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFAS dropped -26.13% vs SPSM's -42.89%.

On 3-year performance, DFAS leads with 15.22% vs 14.42% for SPSM. On fees, SPSM is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, DFAS has been the lower-risk option at 4.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, DFAS has performed better with a 15.22% return vs 14.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPSM is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for DFAS.

SPSM has the higher dividend yield at 1.43%, compared with 0.92% for DFAS.

They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for DFAS and 0.05% for SPSM.

SPSM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFAS and SPSM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer