DFAS vs. SPSM
DFAS (Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF) and SPSM (SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. DFAS is actively managed, while SPSM is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DFAS returned 15.22%/yr vs 14.42%/yr for SPSM. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. DFAS charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for SPSM.
Performance
DFAS vs. SPSM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFAS achieves a 12.81% return, which is significantly lower than SPSM's 15.28% return.
DFAS
- 1D
- -0.81%
- 1M
- 2.19%
- YTD
- 12.81%
- 6M
- 12.10%
- 1Y
- 27.65%
- 3Y*
- 15.22%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPSM
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- 1.62%
- YTD
- 15.28%
- 6M
- 14.19%
- 1Y
- 31.50%
- 3Y*
- 14.42%
- 5Y*
- 5.71%
- 10Y*
- 10.77%
DFAS vs. SPSM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFAS Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF | 12.81% | 8.17% | 10.21% | 17.83% | -13.84% | 4.94% |
SPSM SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF | 15.28% | 6.11% | 8.55% | 16.11% | -16.12% | 1.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFAS and SPSM is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2021 | 0.99 |
The correlation between DFAS and SPSM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
DFAS vs. SPSM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DFAS
SPSM
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
Financial Services
DFAS
SPSM
Industrials
DFAS
SPSM
Technology
DFAS
SPSM
Consumer Cyclical
DFAS
SPSM
Healthcare
DFAS
SPSM
Energy
DFAS
SPSM
Basic Materials
DFAS
SPSM
Consumer Defensive
DFAS
SPSM
Utilities
DFAS
SPSM
Communication Services
DFAS
SPSM
Real Estate
DFAS
SPSM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFAS vs. SPSM — Risk / Return Rank
DFAS
SPSM
DFAS vs. SPSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF (DFAS) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF (SPSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFAS | SPSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.32 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.97 | 3.63 | -0.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.17 | 12.14 | -1.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFAS | SPSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.66 | 1.82 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.27 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.47 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.45 | -0.09 |
Drawdowns
DFAS vs. SPSM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFAS drawdown since its inception was -26.13%, smaller than the maximum SPSM drawdown of -42.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFAS and SPSM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFAS | SPSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.13% | -42.89% | +16.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.36% | -8.72% | -0.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.13% | -27.94% | +1.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.94% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.81% | -0.97% | +0.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.31% | -7.93% | -0.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.73% | 2.60% | +0.13% |
Volatility
DFAS vs. SPSM - Volatility Comparison
Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF (DFAS) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF (SPSM) have volatilities of 4.31% and 4.44%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFAS | SPSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.31% | 4.44% | -0.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.58% | 11.64% | -0.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.77% | 17.47% | -0.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.84% | 21.43% | -0.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.84% | 22.99% | -2.15% |
DFAS vs. SPSM - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFAS has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than SPSM's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
DFAS vs. SPSM - Dividend Comparison
DFAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, less than SPSM's 1.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFAS Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF | 0.92% | 0.99% | 0.93% | 1.00% | 1.03% | 2.87% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPSM SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF | 1.43% | 1.62% | 1.85% | 1.61% | 1.38% | 1.40% | 1.34% | 1.58% | 1.82% | 1.51% | 1.49% | 2.37% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, DFAS and SPSM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SPSM has higher volatility (4.44%) compared to DFAS (4.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFAS dropped -26.13% vs SPSM's -42.89%.
On 3-year performance, DFAS leads with 15.22% vs 14.42% for SPSM. On fees, SPSM is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, DFAS has been the lower-risk option at 4.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DFAS has performed better with a 15.22% return vs 14.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPSM is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for DFAS.
SPSM has the higher dividend yield at 1.43%, compared with 0.92% for DFAS.
They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for DFAS and 0.05% for SPSM.
SPSM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFAS and SPSM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer