PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFAI vs. VT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFAI vs. VT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF (DFAI) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFAI achieves a 9.16% return, which is significantly lower than VT's 12.24% return.


DFAI

1D
-0.84%
1M
2.67%
YTD
9.16%
6M
11.79%
1Y
24.65%
3Y*
18.12%
5Y*
9.36%
10Y*

VT

1D
-0.88%
1M
4.91%
YTD
12.24%
6M
13.14%
1Y
29.24%
3Y*
20.93%
5Y*
10.99%
10Y*
12.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFAI vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
DFAI
Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF
9.16%34.04%4.68%17.60%-12.95%13.86%6.13%
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
12.24%22.43%16.49%22.02%-18.00%18.27%6.69%

Correlation

The correlation between DFAI and VT is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2020

0.89

The correlation between DFAI and VT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

DFAI vs. VT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DFAI
VT

Financial Services

22.5%
15.9%

Industrials

19.5%
12.0%

Technology

9.3%
27.8%

Basic Materials

8.8%
4.2%

Healthcare

8.8%
8.1%

Consumer Cyclical

8.6%
9.5%

Energy

6.8%
4.3%

Consumer Defensive

6.4%
4.8%

Utilities

4.0%
2.7%

Communication Services

3.7%
8.3%

Real Estate

1.5%
2.4%

Financial Services

DFAI
22.5%
VT
15.9%

Industrials

DFAI
19.5%
VT
12.0%

Technology

DFAI
9.3%
VT
27.8%

Basic Materials

DFAI
8.8%
VT
4.2%

Healthcare

DFAI
8.8%
VT
8.1%

Consumer Cyclical

DFAI
8.6%
VT
9.5%

Energy

DFAI
6.8%
VT
4.3%

Consumer Defensive

DFAI
6.4%
VT
4.8%

Utilities

DFAI
4.0%
VT
2.7%

Communication Services

DFAI
3.7%
VT
8.3%

Real Estate

DFAI
1.5%
VT
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFAI vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFAI
DFAI Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
DFAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFAI Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
DFAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFAI Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

VT
VT Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
VT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VT Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
VT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
VT Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFAI vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF (DFAI) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFAIVTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.42

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.26

3.04

-0.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.87

13.53

-4.66

DFAI vs. VT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFAI Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is comparable to the VT Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFAI and VT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFAIVTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.76

2.31

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.69

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

0.44

+0.35

Drawdowns

DFAI vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFAI drawdown since its inception was -27.44%, smaller than the maximum VT drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFAI and VT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFAIVTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.44%

-50.27%

+22.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.95%

-9.67%

-1.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.25%

-16.51%

+3.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.44%

-26.38%

-1.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.61%

-0.88%

-0.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.12%

-7.02%

+1.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.79%

2.17%

+0.62%

Volatility

DFAI vs. VT - Volatility Comparison

Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF (DFAI) has a higher volatility of 4.45% compared to Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) at 3.83%. This indicates that DFAI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFAIVTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.45%

3.83%

+0.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.68%

10.17%

+1.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.08%

12.70%

+1.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.92%

16.05%

-0.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.70%

17.23%

-1.53%

DFAI vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFAI has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than VT's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DFAI vs. VT - Dividend Comparison

DFAI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.26%, more than VT's 1.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFAI
Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF
2.26%2.45%2.72%2.64%2.72%2.06%0.09%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
1.59%1.82%1.95%2.08%2.20%1.82%1.66%2.32%2.53%2.11%2.39%2.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFAI and VT have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DFAI has higher volatility (4.45%) compared to VT (3.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFAI dropped -27.44% vs VT's -50.27%.

On 5-year performance, VT leads with 10.99% vs 9.36% for DFAI. On fees, VT is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, VT has been the lower-risk option at 3.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VT has performed better with a 10.99% return vs 9.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VT is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for DFAI.

DFAI has the higher dividend yield at 2.26%, compared with 1.59% for VT.

They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for DFAI and 0.06% for VT.

VT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFAI and VT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer