DFAI vs. IDOG
DFAI (Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF) and IDOG (ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. DFAI is actively managed, while IDOG is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DFAI returned 10.24%/yr vs 14.23%/yr for IDOG. Their correlation of 0.88 means they have usually moved in the same direction. DFAI charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for IDOG.
Performance
DFAI vs. IDOG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFAI achieves a 12.47% return, which is significantly lower than IDOG's 16.40% return.
DFAI
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- 1.66%
- 6M
- 6.44%
- YTD
- 12.47%
- 1Y
- 27.22%
- 3Y*
- 18.65%
- 5Y*
- 10.24%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.29%
IDOG
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 5.40%
- 6M
- 10.61%
- YTD
- 16.40%
- 1Y
- 34.66%
- 3Y*
- 21.04%
- 5Y*
- 14.23%
- 10Y*
- 10.94%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.88%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $74.51M | $70.03M | $61.85M | |
| $1.71M | $1.45M | $1.24M |
DFAI vs. IDOG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFAI Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF | 12.47% | 34.04% | 4.68% | 17.60% | -12.95% | 13.86% | 5.34% |
IDOG ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF | 16.40% | 39.94% | 1.35% | 23.57% | -4.50% | 11.33% | 6.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFAI and IDOG is 0.77, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2020 | 0.88 |
The correlation between DFAI and IDOG shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (1 year) to 0.88 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
DFAI vs. IDOG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DFAI
IDOG
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
DFAI
IDOG
Industrials
DFAI
IDOG
Technology
DFAI
IDOG
Healthcare
DFAI
IDOG
Consumer Cyclical
DFAI
IDOG
Basic Materials
DFAI
IDOG
Consumer Defensive
DFAI
IDOG
Energy
DFAI
IDOG
Utilities
DFAI
IDOG
Communication Services
DFAI
IDOG
Real Estate
DFAI
IDOG
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFAI vs. IDOG — Risk / Return Rank
DFAI
IDOG
DFAI vs. IDOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF (DFAI) and ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (IDOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DFAI | IDOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.44 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.50 | 5.38 | -2.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.83 | 16.68 | -6.85 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DFAI vs. IDOG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFAI drawdown since its inception was -27.44%, smaller than the maximum IDOG drawdown of -37.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFAI and IDOG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFAI | IDOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.44% | -37.32% | +9.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.95% | -6.47% | -4.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.25% | -13.92% | +0.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.44% | -25.31% | -2.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.24% | -0.27% | +0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.01% | -7.86% | +2.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.78% | 2.08% | +0.70% |
Volatility
DFAI vs. IDOG - Volatility Comparison
Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF (DFAI) has a higher volatility of 4.10% compared to ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (IDOG) at 2.79%. This indicates that DFAI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IDOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFAI | IDOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.10% | 2.79% | +1.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.59% | 10.78% | +1.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.65% | 13.36% | +1.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.00% | 15.64% | +0.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.69% | 17.09% | -1.40% |
DFAI vs. IDOG - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFAI has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than IDOG's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
DFAI vs. IDOG - Dividend Comparison
DFAI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.29%, less than IDOG's 4.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFAI Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF | 2.29% | 2.45% | 2.72% | 2.64% | 2.72% | 2.06% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IDOG ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF | 4.23% | 4.26% | 4.90% | 4.86% | 4.46% | 3.85% | 3.00% | 5.41% | 4.50% | 3.33% | 4.01% | 4.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DFAI and IDOG have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DFAI has higher volatility (4.10%) compared to IDOG (2.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFAI dropped -27.44% vs IDOG's -37.32%.
On 5-year performance, IDOG leads with 14.23% vs 10.24% for DFAI. On fees, DFAI is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, IDOG has been the lower-risk option at 2.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IDOG has performed better with a 14.23% return vs 10.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DFAI is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for IDOG.
IDOG has the higher dividend yield at 4.23%, compared with 2.29% for DFAI.
They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for DFAI and 0.50% for IDOG.
IDOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFAI and IDOG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer