PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFAI vs. DFIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFAI vs. DFIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF (DFAI) and Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFAI achieves a 9.16% return, which is significantly lower than DFIV's 11.54% return.


DFAI

1D
-0.84%
1M
2.67%
YTD
9.16%
6M
11.79%
1Y
24.65%
3Y*
18.12%
5Y*
9.36%
10Y*

DFIV

1D
-0.70%
1M
2.57%
YTD
11.54%
6M
15.41%
1Y
34.88%
3Y*
23.90%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFAI vs. DFIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
DFAI
Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF
9.16%34.04%4.68%17.60%-12.95%-1.29%
DFIV
Dimensional International Value ETF
11.54%45.36%7.26%17.75%-3.70%0.08%

Correlation

The correlation between DFAI and DFIV is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2021

0.95

The correlation between DFAI and DFIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

DFAI vs. DFIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DFAI
DFIV

Financial Services

22.5%
32.4%

Industrials

19.5%
9.6%

Technology

9.3%
2.8%

Basic Materials

8.8%
10.9%

Healthcare

8.8%
4.9%

Consumer Cyclical

8.6%
9.6%

Energy

6.8%
16.4%

Consumer Defensive

6.4%
4.9%

Utilities

4.0%
2.5%

Communication Services

3.7%
4.2%

Real Estate

1.5%
1.8%

Financial Services

DFAI
22.5%
DFIV
32.4%

Industrials

DFAI
19.5%
DFIV
9.6%

Technology

DFAI
9.3%
DFIV
2.8%

Basic Materials

DFAI
8.8%
DFIV
10.9%

Healthcare

DFAI
8.8%
DFIV
4.9%

Consumer Cyclical

DFAI
8.6%
DFIV
9.6%

Energy

DFAI
6.8%
DFIV
16.4%

Consumer Defensive

DFAI
6.4%
DFIV
4.9%

Utilities

DFAI
4.0%
DFIV
2.5%

Communication Services

DFAI
3.7%
DFIV
4.2%

Real Estate

DFAI
1.5%
DFIV
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFAI vs. DFIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFAI
DFAI Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
DFAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFAI Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
DFAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFAI Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

DFIV
DFIV Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
DFIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFIV Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
DFIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFIV Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFAI vs. DFIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF (DFAI) and Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFAIDFIVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.46

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.26

3.63

-1.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.87

14.02

-5.15

DFAI vs. DFIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFAI Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is lower than the DFIV Sharpe Ratio of 2.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFAI and DFIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFAIDFIVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.76

2.56

-0.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

0.94

-0.15

Drawdowns

DFAI vs. DFIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFAI drawdown since its inception was -27.44%, which is greater than DFIV's maximum drawdown of -25.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFAI and DFIV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFAIDFIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.44%

-25.42%

-2.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.95%

-9.66%

-1.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.25%

-14.72%

+1.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.61%

-1.02%

-0.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.12%

-4.48%

-0.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.79%

2.49%

+0.30%

Volatility

DFAI vs. DFIV - Volatility Comparison

Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF (DFAI) has a higher volatility of 4.45% compared to Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV) at 3.89%. This indicates that DFAI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFAIDFIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.45%

3.89%

+0.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.68%

10.99%

+0.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.08%

13.69%

+0.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.92%

16.63%

-0.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.70%

16.63%

-0.93%

DFAI vs. DFIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFAI has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than DFIV's 0.27% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DFAI vs. DFIV - Dividend Comparison

DFAI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.26%, less than DFIV's 2.55% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
DFAI
Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF
2.26%2.45%2.72%2.64%2.72%2.06%0.09%
DFIV
Dimensional International Value ETF
2.55%2.92%3.88%3.93%3.84%2.30%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, DFAI and DFIV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DFAI has higher volatility (4.45%) compared to DFIV (3.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFAI dropped -27.44% vs DFIV's -25.42%.

On 3-year performance, DFIV leads with 23.90% vs 18.12% for DFAI. On fees, DFAI is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, DFIV has been the lower-risk option at 3.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, DFIV has performed better with a 23.90% return vs 18.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DFAI is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.27% for DFIV.

DFIV has the higher dividend yield at 2.55%, compared with 2.26% for DFAI.

DFAI is categorized as Global Equities, while DFIV is Foreign Large Cap Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for DFAI and 0.27% for DFIV.

DFIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFAI and DFIV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer