DFAI vs. DFIV
DFAI (Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF) and DFIV (Dimensional International Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DFAI is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional, while DFIV is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, DFAI returned 18.12%/yr vs 23.90%/yr for DFIV. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. DFAI charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.27%/yr for DFIV.
Performance
DFAI vs. DFIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFAI achieves a 9.16% return, which is significantly lower than DFIV's 11.54% return.
DFAI
- 1D
- -0.84%
- 1M
- 2.67%
- YTD
- 9.16%
- 6M
- 11.79%
- 1Y
- 24.65%
- 3Y*
- 18.12%
- 5Y*
- 9.36%
- 10Y*
- —
DFIV
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 2.57%
- YTD
- 11.54%
- 6M
- 15.41%
- 1Y
- 34.88%
- 3Y*
- 23.90%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DFAI vs. DFIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFAI Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF | 9.16% | 34.04% | 4.68% | 17.60% | -12.95% | -1.29% |
DFIV Dimensional International Value ETF | 11.54% | 45.36% | 7.26% | 17.75% | -3.70% | 0.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFAI and DFIV is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2021 | 0.95 |
The correlation between DFAI and DFIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
DFAI vs. DFIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DFAI
DFIV
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
Financial Services
DFAI
DFIV
Industrials
DFAI
DFIV
Technology
DFAI
DFIV
Basic Materials
DFAI
DFIV
Healthcare
DFAI
DFIV
Consumer Cyclical
DFAI
DFIV
Energy
DFAI
DFIV
Consumer Defensive
DFAI
DFIV
Utilities
DFAI
DFIV
Communication Services
DFAI
DFIV
Real Estate
DFAI
DFIV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFAI vs. DFIV — Risk / Return Rank
DFAI
DFIV
DFAI vs. DFIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF (DFAI) and Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFAI | DFIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.46 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.26 | 3.63 | -1.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.87 | 14.02 | -5.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFAI | DFIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.76 | 2.56 | -0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.78 | 0.94 | -0.15 |
Drawdowns
DFAI vs. DFIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFAI drawdown since its inception was -27.44%, which is greater than DFIV's maximum drawdown of -25.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFAI and DFIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFAI | DFIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.44% | -25.42% | -2.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.95% | -9.66% | -1.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.25% | -14.72% | +1.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.44% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.61% | -1.02% | -0.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.12% | -4.48% | -0.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.79% | 2.49% | +0.30% |
Volatility
DFAI vs. DFIV - Volatility Comparison
Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF (DFAI) has a higher volatility of 4.45% compared to Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV) at 3.89%. This indicates that DFAI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFAI | DFIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.45% | 3.89% | +0.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.68% | 10.99% | +0.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.08% | 13.69% | +0.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.92% | 16.63% | -0.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.70% | 16.63% | -0.93% |
DFAI vs. DFIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFAI has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than DFIV's 0.27% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
DFAI vs. DFIV - Dividend Comparison
DFAI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.26%, less than DFIV's 2.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFAI Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF | 2.26% | 2.45% | 2.72% | 2.64% | 2.72% | 2.06% | 0.09% |
DFIV Dimensional International Value ETF | 2.55% | 2.92% | 3.88% | 3.93% | 3.84% | 2.30% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, DFAI and DFIV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
DFAI has higher volatility (4.45%) compared to DFIV (3.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFAI dropped -27.44% vs DFIV's -25.42%.
On 3-year performance, DFIV leads with 23.90% vs 18.12% for DFAI. On fees, DFAI is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, DFIV has been the lower-risk option at 3.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DFIV has performed better with a 23.90% return vs 18.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DFAI is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.27% for DFIV.
DFIV has the higher dividend yield at 2.55%, compared with 2.26% for DFAI.
DFAI is categorized as Global Equities, while DFIV is Foreign Large Cap Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for DFAI and 0.27% for DFIV.
DFIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFAI and DFIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer