DFAI vs. DFAC
DFAI (Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF) and DFAC (Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DFAI is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional, while DFAC is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, DFAI returned 9.63%/yr vs 11.70%/yr for DFAC. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DFAI charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for DFAC.
Performance
DFAI vs. DFAC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFAI achieves a 9.26% return, which is significantly lower than DFAC's 11.26% return.
DFAI
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- -0.98%
- YTD
- 9.26%
- 6M
- 8.66%
- 1Y
- 24.42%
- 3Y*
- 18.32%
- 5Y*
- 9.63%
- 10Y*
- —
DFAC
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- 0.04%
- YTD
- 11.26%
- 6M
- 9.76%
- 1Y
- 25.77%
- 3Y*
- 19.81%
- 5Y*
- 11.70%
- 10Y*
- —
DFAI vs. DFAC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFAI Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF | 9.26% | 34.04% | 4.68% | 17.60% | -12.95% | -0.60% |
DFAC Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF | 11.26% | 15.66% | 19.61% | 21.96% | -14.93% | 9.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFAI and DFAC is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2021 | 0.79 |
The correlation between DFAI and DFAC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
DFAI vs. DFAC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DFAI
DFAC
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
DFAI
DFAC
Industrials
DFAI
DFAC
Healthcare
DFAI
DFAC
Basic Materials
DFAI
DFAC
Technology
DFAI
DFAC
Consumer Cyclical
DFAI
DFAC
Consumer Defensive
DFAI
DFAC
Energy
DFAI
DFAC
Communication Services
DFAI
DFAC
Utilities
DFAI
DFAC
Real Estate
DFAI
DFAC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFAI vs. DFAC — Risk / Return Rank
DFAI
DFAC
DFAI vs. DFAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF (DFAI) and Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DFAI | DFAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.37 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.24 | 3.05 | -0.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.71 | 13.28 | -4.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DFAI vs. DFAC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFAI drawdown since its inception was -27.44%, which is greater than DFAC's maximum drawdown of -23.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFAI and DFAC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFAI | DFAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.44% | -23.12% | -4.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.95% | -8.49% | -2.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.25% | -20.02% | +6.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.44% | -23.12% | -4.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.52% | -1.35% | -0.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.08% | -5.40% | +0.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.81% | 1.95% | +0.86% |
Volatility
DFAI vs. DFAC - Volatility Comparison
Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF (DFAI) has a higher volatility of 4.83% compared to Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAC) at 4.41%. This indicates that DFAI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFAI | DFAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.83% | 4.41% | +0.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.39% | 9.67% | +2.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.56% | 12.56% | +2.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.99% | 17.14% | -1.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.73% | 17.12% | -1.39% |
DFAI vs. DFAC - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFAI has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than DFAC's 0.17% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
DFAI vs. DFAC - Dividend Comparison
DFAI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.36%, more than DFAC's 0.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFAC Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF | 0.92% | 0.97% | 1.03% | 1.20% | 1.50% | 0.88% | 0.00% |
DFAI Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF | 2.36% | 2.45% | 2.72% | 2.64% | 2.72% | 2.06% | 0.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DFAI and DFAC have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DFAI has higher volatility (4.83%) compared to DFAC (4.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFAI dropped -27.44% vs DFAC's -23.12%.
On 5-year performance, DFAC leads with 11.70% vs 9.63% for DFAI. On fees, DFAC is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, DFAC has been the lower-risk option at 4.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DFAC has performed better with a 11.70% return vs 9.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DFAC is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for DFAI.
DFAI has the higher dividend yield at 2.36%, compared with 0.92% for DFAC.
DFAI is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while DFAC is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for DFAI and 0.17% for DFAC.
DFAC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFAI and DFAC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer