DEW vs. SCHV
DEW (WisdomTree Global High Dividend Fund) and SCHV (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds - DEW tracks the WisdomTree Global High Dividend Index while SCHV tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Value Total Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DEW returned 9.92%/yr vs 12.25%/yr for SCHV. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DEW charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHV.
Performance
DEW vs. SCHV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DEW achieves a 13.36% return, which is significantly lower than SCHV's 18.75% return. Over the past 10 years, DEW has underperformed SCHV with an annualized return of 9.92%, while SCHV has yielded a comparatively higher 12.25% annualized return.
DEW
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- 0.46%
- YTD
- 13.36%
- 6M
- 12.75%
- 1Y
- 26.28%
- 3Y*
- 19.11%
- 5Y*
- 11.54%
- 10Y*
- 9.92%
SCHV
- 1D
- 1.43%
- 1M
- 4.17%
- YTD
- 18.75%
- 6M
- 17.40%
- 1Y
- 30.47%
- 3Y*
- 19.36%
- 5Y*
- 11.33%
- 10Y*
- 12.25%
DEW vs. SCHV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DEW WisdomTree Global High Dividend Fund | 13.36% | 22.39% | 11.58% | 9.39% | -2.73% | 21.29% | -7.32% | 20.45% | -10.58% | 15.38% |
SCHV Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF | 18.75% | 16.02% | 14.13% | 8.93% | -7.65% | 25.58% | 2.64% | 25.92% | -7.30% | 16.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between DEW and SCHV is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2009 | 0.86 |
The correlation between DEW and SCHV shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (1 year) to 0.89 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
DEW vs. SCHV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DEW
SCHV
Financial Services
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Technology
Financial Services
DEW
SCHV
Energy
DEW
SCHV
Utilities
DEW
SCHV
Real Estate
DEW
SCHV
Healthcare
DEW
SCHV
Consumer Defensive
DEW
SCHV
Industrials
DEW
SCHV
Communication Services
DEW
SCHV
Consumer Cyclical
DEW
SCHV
Basic Materials
DEW
SCHV
Technology
DEW
SCHV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DEW vs. SCHV — Risk / Return Rank
DEW
SCHV
DEW vs. SCHV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Global High Dividend Fund (DEW) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DEW | SCHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.49 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.17 | 4.48 | -0.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.27 | 17.98 | -1.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DEW vs. SCHV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DEW drawdown since its inception was -65.55%, which is greater than SCHV's maximum drawdown of -37.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEW and SCHV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DEW | SCHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.55% | -37.08% | -28.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.34% | -6.83% | +0.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.80% | -15.26% | +3.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.86% | -19.78% | +0.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.77% | -37.08% | -1.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.77% | 0.00% | -0.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.40% | -3.82% | -8.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.62% | 1.70% | -0.08% |
Volatility
DEW vs. SCHV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree Global High Dividend Fund (DEW) is 2.85%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) has a volatility of 4.31%. This indicates that DEW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DEW | SCHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.85% | 4.31% | -1.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.38% | 8.82% | -1.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.75% | 11.17% | -1.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.98% | 14.55% | -1.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.41% | 16.94% | -1.53% |
DEW vs. SCHV - Expense Ratio Comparison
DEW has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHV's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
DEW vs. SCHV - Dividend Comparison
DEW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.28%, more than SCHV's 1.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DEW WisdomTree Global High Dividend Fund | 3.28% | 3.71% | 4.02% | 4.55% | 3.82% | 3.55% | 4.10% | 3.74% | 4.17% | 3.18% | 3.42% | 4.32% |
SCHV Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF | 1.75% | 2.02% | 2.25% | 2.42% | 2.37% | 1.93% | 3.03% | 3.02% | 3.05% | 2.37% | 2.65% | 2.69% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DEW and SCHV have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHV has higher volatility (4.31%) compared to DEW (2.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DEW dropped -65.55% vs SCHV's -37.08%.
On 10-year performance, SCHV leads with 12.25% vs 9.92% for DEW. On fees, SCHV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, DEW has been the lower-risk option at 2.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCHV has performed better with a 12.25% return vs 9.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for DEW.
DEW has the higher dividend yield at 3.28%, compared with 1.75% for SCHV.
DEW tracks WisdomTree Global High Dividend Index, while SCHV tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Value Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for DEW and 0.04% for SCHV.
SCHV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 2.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DEW and SCHV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer