DES vs. SMCP
DES (WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Dividend Fund) and SMCP (AlphaMark Actively Managed Small Cap ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds - DES tracks the WisdomTree SmallCap Dividend (TR) while SMCP tracks the Actively Managed. Both are passively managed. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DES charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for SMCP.
Performance
DES vs. SMCP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
DES
- 1D
- 0.99%
- 1M
- 0.53%
- YTD
- 16.63%
- 6M
- 17.07%
- 1Y
- 28.87%
- 3Y*
- 14.65%
- 5Y*
- 6.21%
- 10Y*
- 8.17%
SMCP
- 1D
- 1.02%
- 1M
- -25.77%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DES vs. SMCP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
DES WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Dividend Fund | 3.59% |
SMCP AlphaMark Actively Managed Small Cap ETF | -25.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between DES and SMCP is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2026 | 0.20 |
DES vs. SMCP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DES
SMCP
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Energy
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Healthcare
Financial Services
DES
SMCP
Consumer Cyclical
DES
SMCP
Industrials
DES
SMCP
Energy
DES
SMCP
Real Estate
DES
SMCP
Basic Materials
DES
SMCP
Technology
DES
SMCP
Utilities
DES
SMCP
Consumer Defensive
DES
SMCP
Communication Services
DES
SMCP
Healthcare
DES
SMCP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DES vs. SMCP — Risk / Return Rank
DES
SMCP
DES vs. SMCP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Dividend Fund (DES) and AlphaMark Actively Managed Small Cap ETF (SMCP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DES | SMCP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.77 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.64 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.67 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.48 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DES | SMCP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.77 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | -1.43 | +1.75 |
Drawdowns
DES vs. SMCP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DES drawdown since its inception was -65.48%, which is greater than SMCP's maximum drawdown of -27.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DES and SMCP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DES | SMCP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.48% | -27.86% | -37.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.64% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.16% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.16% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.65% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.28% | -25.77% | +25.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.68% | -5.07% | -4.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.68% | — | — |
Volatility
DES vs. SMCP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DES | SMCP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.24% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.94% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.42% | 43.91% | -27.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.56% | 43.91% | -24.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.97% | 43.91% | -21.94% |
DES vs. SMCP - Expense Ratio Comparison
DES has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than SMCP's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
DES vs. SMCP - Dividend Comparison
DES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.37%, while SMCP has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DES WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Dividend Fund | 2.37% | 2.85% | 2.81% | 2.65% | 2.89% | 2.31% | 2.75% | 2.68% | 3.65% | 2.89% | 2.70% | 3.09% |
SMCP AlphaMark Actively Managed Small Cap ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DES and SMCP have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DES is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DES is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for SMCP.
DES has the higher dividend yield at 2.37%, compared with 0.00% for SMCP.
DES tracks WisdomTree SmallCap Dividend (TR), while SMCP tracks Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and AlphaMark Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for DES and 0.90% for SMCP.
Find the right allocation for DES and SMCP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer