PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DES vs. ROSC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DES vs. ROSC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Dividend Fund (DES) and Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF (ROSC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DES achieves a 24.40% return, which is significantly higher than ROSC's 21.44% return. Over the past 10 years, DES has underperformed ROSC with an annualized return of 8.19%, while ROSC has yielded a comparatively higher 11.09% annualized return.


DES

1D
1.38%
1M
2.25%
6M
14.77%
YTD
24.40%
1Y
34.94%
3Y*
13.85%
5Y*
8.92%
10Y*
8.19%
ALL TIME*
7.95%

ROSC

1D
1.35%
1M
1.50%
6M
14.44%
YTD
21.44%
1Y
40.60%
3Y*
16.07%
5Y*
10.37%
10Y*
11.09%
ALL TIME*
9.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$3.72M$4.44M$5.66M
$136.27K$122.07K$123.34K

DES vs. ROSC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DES
WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Dividend Fund
24.40%0.25%9.93%16.50%-10.96%26.51%-4.26%20.26%-12.85%8.64%
ROSC
Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF
21.44%10.18%7.28%18.88%-10.58%31.37%5.27%17.09%-12.38%24.49%

Correlation

The correlation between DES and ROSC is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2015

0.83

The correlation between DES and ROSC shifts across timeframes, from 0.83 (all time) to 0.95 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DES vs. ROSC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DES
ROSC

Financial Services

25.2%
19.3%

Consumer Cyclical

16.3%
14.8%

Industrials

13.6%
11.5%

Real Estate

9.9%
5.7%

Energy

9.5%
2.3%

Technology

6.2%
12.3%

Basic Materials

6.1%
2.7%

Utilities

4.1%
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.1%
6.3%

Communication Services

2.9%
3.6%

Healthcare

2.1%
19.0%

Financial Services

DES
25.2%
ROSC
19.3%

Consumer Cyclical

DES
16.3%
ROSC
14.8%

Industrials

DES
13.6%
ROSC
11.5%

Real Estate

DES
9.9%
ROSC
5.7%

Energy

DES
9.5%
ROSC
2.3%

Technology

DES
6.2%
ROSC
12.3%

Basic Materials

DES
6.1%
ROSC
2.7%

Utilities

DES
4.1%
ROSC
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

DES
4.1%
ROSC
6.3%

Communication Services

DES
2.9%
ROSC
3.6%

Healthcare

DES
2.1%
ROSC
19.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DES vs. ROSC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DES
DES Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
DES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DES Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
DES Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
DES Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
DES Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

ROSC
ROSC Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
ROSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROSC Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
ROSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROSC Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DES vs. ROSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Dividend Fund (DES) and Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF (ROSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DESROSCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.48

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.59

5.26

-0.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.84

17.73

-3.89

DES vs. ROSC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DES Sharpe Ratio is 2.23, which is comparable to the ROSC Sharpe Ratio of 2.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DES and ROSC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DES vs. ROSC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DES drawdown since its inception was -65.48%, which is greater than ROSC's maximum drawdown of -43.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DES and ROSC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DESROSCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.48%

-43.13%

-22.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.64%

-7.75%

+0.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.16%

-23.74%

-1.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.16%

-23.74%

-1.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.65%

-43.13%

-2.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.18%

-0.42%

+0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.61%

-7.12%

-2.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.53%

2.30%

+0.23%

Volatility

DES vs. ROSC - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Dividend Fund (DES) and Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF (ROSC) have volatilities of 3.55% and 3.55%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DESROSCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.55%

3.55%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.25%

10.12%

+0.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.76%

15.09%

+0.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.39%

19.21%

+0.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.93%

20.25%

+1.68%

DES vs. ROSC - Expense Ratio Comparison

DES has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than ROSC's 0.34% expense ratio.


Dividends

DES vs. ROSC - Dividend Comparison

DES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.23%, more than ROSC's 1.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DES
WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Dividend Fund
2.23%2.85%2.81%2.65%2.89%2.31%2.75%2.68%3.65%2.89%2.70%3.09%
ROSC
Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF
1.77%2.08%2.00%2.01%1.51%2.13%1.75%3.05%2.86%2.13%2.20%2.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, DES and ROSC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ROSC has higher volatility (3.55%) compared to DES (3.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DES dropped -65.48% vs ROSC's -43.13%.

On 10-year performance, ROSC leads with 11.09% vs 8.19% for DES. On fees, ROSC is cheaper at 0.34% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ROSC has performed better with a 11.09% return vs 8.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ROSC is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for DES.

DES has the higher dividend yield at 2.23%, compared with 1.77% for ROSC.

DES tracks WisdomTree SmallCap Dividend (TR), while ROSC tracks ROSC-US - Hartford Multifactor Small Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Hartford. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for DES and 0.34% for ROSC.

ROSC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DES and ROSC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer