DES vs. MSSM
DES (WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Dividend Fund) and MSSM (Morgan Stanley Pathway Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. DES is passively managed, while MSSM is actively managed. Over the past year, DES returned 28.87% vs 38.71% for MSSM. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DES charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.62%/yr for MSSM.
Performance
DES vs. MSSM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DES achieves a 16.63% return, which is significantly lower than MSSM's 18.28% return.
DES
- 1D
- 0.99%
- 1M
- 0.53%
- YTD
- 16.63%
- 6M
- 17.07%
- 1Y
- 28.87%
- 3Y*
- 14.65%
- 5Y*
- 6.21%
- 10Y*
- 8.17%
MSSM
- 1D
- 1.14%
- 1M
- 4.12%
- YTD
- 18.28%
- 6M
- 19.49%
- 1Y
- 38.71%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DES vs. MSSM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
DES WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Dividend Fund | 16.63% | 0.25% | -5.77% |
MSSM Morgan Stanley Pathway Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF | 18.28% | 11.33% | -5.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between DES and MSSM is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2024 | 0.84 |
The correlation between DES and MSSM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DES vs. MSSM — Risk / Return Rank
DES
MSSM
DES vs. MSSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Dividend Fund (DES) and Morgan Stanley Pathway Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF (MSSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DES | MSSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.77 | 2.26 | -0.49 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.64 | 3.13 | -0.49 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.38 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.67 | 4.10 | -0.43 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.48 | 15.85 | -5.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DES | MSSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.77 | 2.26 | -0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.76 | -0.44 |
Drawdowns
DES vs. MSSM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DES drawdown since its inception was -65.48%, which is greater than MSSM's maximum drawdown of -24.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DES and MSSM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DES | MSSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.48% | -24.18% | -41.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.64% | -9.50% | +1.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.16% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.16% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.65% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.28% | 0.00% | -0.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.68% | -4.68% | -5.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.68% | 2.46% | +0.22% |
Volatility
DES vs. MSSM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Dividend Fund (DES) is 4.24%, while Morgan Stanley Pathway Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF (MSSM) has a volatility of 4.99%. This indicates that DES experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSSM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DES | MSSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.24% | 4.99% | -0.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.94% | 12.75% | -1.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.42% | 17.25% | -0.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.56% | 20.92% | -1.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.97% | 20.92% | +1.05% |
DES vs. MSSM - Expense Ratio Comparison
DES has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than MSSM's 0.62% expense ratio.
Dividends
DES vs. MSSM - Dividend Comparison
DES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.37%, less than MSSM's 2.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DES WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Dividend Fund | 2.37% | 2.85% | 2.81% | 2.65% | 2.89% | 2.31% | 2.75% | 2.68% | 3.65% | 2.89% | 2.70% | 3.09% |
MSSM Morgan Stanley Pathway Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF | 2.66% | 3.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DES and MSSM have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSSM has higher volatility (4.99%) compared to DES (4.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DES dropped -65.48% vs MSSM's -24.18%.
On 1-year performance, MSSM leads with 38.71% vs 28.87% for DES. On fees, DES is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, DES has been the lower-risk option at 4.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MSSM has performed better with a 38.71% return vs 28.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DES is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for MSSM.
MSSM has the higher dividend yield at 2.66%, compared with 2.37% for DES.
They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Morgan Stanley. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for DES and 0.62% for MSSM.
MSSM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DES and MSSM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer