DES vs. CVSM
DES (WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Dividend Fund) and CVSM (CresAlta Small & Mid-Cap ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. DES is passively managed, while CVSM is actively managed. Their 0.78 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. DES charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for CVSM.
Performance
DES vs. CVSM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
DES
- 1D
- 1.38%
- 1M
- 2.25%
- 6M
- 14.77%
- YTD
- 24.40%
- 1Y
- 34.94%
- 3Y*
- 13.85%
- 5Y*
- 8.92%
- 10Y*
- 8.19%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.95%
CVSM
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- 0.96%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $55.47K | $49.16K | $43.33K | |
| $3.72M | $4.44M | $5.66M |
DES vs. CVSM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
DES WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Dividend Fund | 10.14% |
CVSM CresAlta Small & Mid-Cap ETF | 4.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between DES and CVSM is 0.78, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2026 | 0.78 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DES vs. CVSM — Risk / Return Rank
DES
CVSM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DES vs. CVSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Dividend Fund (DES) and CresAlta Small & Mid-Cap ETF (CVSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DES | CVSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.59 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.84 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DES vs. CVSM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DES drawdown since its inception was -65.48%, which is greater than CVSM's maximum drawdown of -3.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DES and CVSM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DES | CVSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.48% | -3.36% | -62.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.64% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.16% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.16% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.65% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.18% | -1.84% | +1.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.61% | -0.97% | -8.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.53% | — | — |
Volatility
DES vs. CVSM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DES | CVSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.55% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.25% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.76% | 11.58% | +4.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.39% | 11.58% | +7.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.93% | 11.58% | +10.35% |
DES vs. CVSM - Expense Ratio Comparison
DES has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than CVSM's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
DES vs. CVSM - Dividend Comparison
DES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.23%, more than CVSM's 0.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVSM CresAlta Small & Mid-Cap ETF | 0.23% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DES WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Dividend Fund | 2.23% | 2.85% | 2.81% | 2.65% | 2.89% | 2.31% | 2.75% | 2.68% | 3.65% | 2.89% | 2.70% | 3.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DES and CVSM have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DES is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DES is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for CVSM.
DES has the higher dividend yield at 2.23%, compared with 0.23% for CVSM.
They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and CresAlta. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for DES and 0.55% for CVSM.
Find the right allocation for DES and CVSM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer