DES vs. ASCE
DES (WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Dividend Fund) and ASCE (Allspring SMID Core ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. DES is passively managed, while ASCE is actively managed. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.38% expense ratio.
Performance
DES vs. ASCE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DES achieves a 16.63% return, which is significantly lower than ASCE's 22.72% return.
DES
- 1D
- 0.99%
- 1M
- 0.53%
- YTD
- 16.63%
- 6M
- 17.07%
- 1Y
- 28.87%
- 3Y*
- 14.65%
- 5Y*
- 6.21%
- 10Y*
- 8.17%
ASCE
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- 5.53%
- YTD
- 22.72%
- 6M
- 23.54%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DES vs. ASCE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DES WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Dividend Fund | 16.63% | 3.44% |
ASCE Allspring SMID Core ETF | 22.72% | 8.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between DES and ASCE is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2025 | 0.77 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DES vs. ASCE — Risk / Return Rank
DES
ASCE
DES vs. ASCE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Dividend Fund (DES) and Allspring SMID Core ETF (ASCE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DES | ASCE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.77 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.64 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.67 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.48 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DES | ASCE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.77 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 1.95 | -1.64 |
Drawdowns
DES vs. ASCE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DES drawdown since its inception was -65.48%, which is greater than ASCE's maximum drawdown of -9.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DES and ASCE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DES | ASCE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.48% | -9.22% | -56.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.64% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.16% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.16% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.65% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.28% | 0.00% | -0.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.68% | -2.10% | -7.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.68% | — | — |
Volatility
DES vs. ASCE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DES | ASCE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.24% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.94% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.42% | 19.29% | -2.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.56% | 19.29% | +0.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.97% | 19.29% | +2.68% |
DES vs. ASCE - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both DES and ASCE have an expense ratio of 0.38%.
Dividends
DES vs. ASCE - Dividend Comparison
DES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.37%, more than ASCE's 0.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASCE Allspring SMID Core ETF | 0.18% | 0.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DES WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Dividend Fund | 2.37% | 2.85% | 2.81% | 2.65% | 2.89% | 2.31% | 2.75% | 2.68% | 3.65% | 2.89% | 2.70% | 3.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DES and ASCE have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.38% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DES and ASCE have the same expense ratio: 0.38% per year.
DES has the higher dividend yield at 2.37%, compared with 0.18% for ASCE.
They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Allspring.
Find the right allocation for DES and ASCE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer