DEMZ vs. MTUM
DEMZ (Democratic Large Cap Core ETF) and MTUM (iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DEMZ is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Democratic Large Cap Core Index, while MTUM is a Momentum fund tracking the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DEMZ returned 12.90%/yr vs 14.96%/yr for MTUM. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DEMZ charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for MTUM.
Performance
DEMZ vs. MTUM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DEMZ achieves a 8.48% return, which is significantly lower than MTUM's 30.30% return.
DEMZ
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- 6.44%
- YTD
- 8.48%
- 6M
- 9.06%
- 1Y
- 24.86%
- 3Y*
- 22.00%
- 5Y*
- 12.90%
- 10Y*
- —
MTUM
- 1D
- -1.10%
- 1M
- 11.94%
- YTD
- 30.30%
- 6M
- 29.99%
- 1Y
- 40.55%
- 3Y*
- 34.34%
- 5Y*
- 14.96%
- 10Y*
- 17.19%
DEMZ vs. MTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DEMZ Democratic Large Cap Core ETF | 8.48% | 19.84% | 22.89% | 24.43% | -19.01% | 32.65% | 11.09% |
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | 30.30% | 22.15% | 32.89% | 9.15% | -18.27% | 13.36% | 11.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between DEMZ and MTUM is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2020 | 0.75 |
The correlation between DEMZ and MTUM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
DEMZ vs. MTUM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DEMZ
MTUM
Technology
Communication Services
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Technology
DEMZ
MTUM
Communication Services
DEMZ
MTUM
Industrials
DEMZ
MTUM
Financial Services
DEMZ
MTUM
Consumer Cyclical
DEMZ
MTUM
Consumer Defensive
DEMZ
MTUM
Healthcare
DEMZ
MTUM
Real Estate
DEMZ
MTUM
Basic Materials
DEMZ
-
MTUM
Energy
DEMZ
-
MTUM
Utilities
DEMZ
-
MTUM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DEMZ vs. MTUM — Risk / Return Rank
DEMZ
MTUM
DEMZ vs. MTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Democratic Large Cap Core ETF (DEMZ) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DEMZ | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.38 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.03 | 3.53 | -1.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.56 | 14.10 | -6.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DEMZ | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.78 | 2.14 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.82 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.96 | 0.84 | +0.12 |
Drawdowns
DEMZ vs. MTUM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DEMZ drawdown since its inception was -27.17%, smaller than the maximum MTUM drawdown of -34.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEMZ and MTUM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DEMZ | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.17% | -34.08% | +6.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.28% | -11.54% | -0.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.69% | -20.99% | +2.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.17% | -32.28% | +5.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.08% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.25% | -1.10% | +0.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.11% | -6.21% | +0.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.29% | 2.89% | +0.40% |
Volatility
DEMZ vs. MTUM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Democratic Large Cap Core ETF (DEMZ) is 3.66%, while iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) has a volatility of 7.67%. This indicates that DEMZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DEMZ | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.66% | 7.67% | -4.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.89% | 16.51% | -5.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.04% | 19.08% | -5.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.80% | 20.60% | -2.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.46% | 21.03% | -3.57% |
DEMZ vs. MTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison
DEMZ has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than MTUM's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
DEMZ vs. MTUM - Dividend Comparison
DEMZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, more than MTUM's 0.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DEMZ Democratic Large Cap Core ETF | 0.90% | 0.98% | 0.53% | 0.90% | 0.98% | 2.46% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | 0.60% | 0.91% | 0.75% | 1.35% | 1.80% | 0.55% | 0.83% | 1.48% | 1.27% | 1.02% | 1.43% | 1.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DEMZ and MTUM have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MTUM has higher volatility (7.67%) compared to DEMZ (3.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DEMZ dropped -27.17% vs MTUM's -34.08%.
On 5-year performance, MTUM leads with 14.96% vs 12.90% for DEMZ. On fees, MTUM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, DEMZ has been the lower-risk option at 3.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, MTUM has performed better with a 14.96% return vs 12.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MTUM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for DEMZ.
DEMZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.90%, compared with 0.60% for MTUM.
DEMZ is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while MTUM is Momentum. DEMZ tracks Democratic Large Cap Core Index, while MTUM tracks MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index. They also come from different issuers: Reflection Asset Management, LLC and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for DEMZ and 0.15% for MTUM.
MTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DEMZ and MTUM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer