DEMZ vs. FSELX
DEMZ (Democratic Large Cap Core ETF) and FSELX (Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio) are both funds - DEMZ is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Democratic Large Cap Core Index, while FSELX is a Semiconductors fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, DEMZ returned 12.43%/yr vs 46.40%/yr for FSELX. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DEMZ charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for FSELX.
Performance
DEMZ vs. FSELX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DEMZ achieves a 8.00% return, which is significantly lower than FSELX's 89.12% return.
DEMZ
- 1D
- -1.62%
- 1M
- 1.76%
- YTD
- 8.00%
- 6M
- 7.13%
- 1Y
- 23.85%
- 3Y*
- 21.20%
- 5Y*
- 12.43%
- 10Y*
- —
FSELX
- 1D
- 0.90%
- 1M
- 13.81%
- YTD
- 89.12%
- 6M
- 86.03%
- 1Y
- 158.55%
- 3Y*
- 69.14%
- 5Y*
- 46.40%
- 10Y*
- 40.05%
DEMZ vs. FSELX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DEMZ Democratic Large Cap Core ETF | 8.00% | 19.84% | 22.89% | 24.43% | -19.01% | 32.65% | 11.27% |
FSELX Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio | 89.12% | 52.17% | 49.68% | 78.49% | -35.27% | 59.16% | 22.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between DEMZ and FSELX is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2020 | 0.72 |
The correlation between DEMZ and FSELX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DEMZ vs. FSELX — Risk / Return Rank
DEMZ
FSELX
DEMZ vs. FSELX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Democratic Large Cap Core ETF (DEMZ) and Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio (FSELX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DEMZ | FSELX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.61 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.95 | 11.17 | -9.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.22 | 40.11 | -32.89 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DEMZ vs. FSELX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DEMZ drawdown since its inception was -27.17%, smaller than the maximum FSELX drawdown of -82.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEMZ and FSELX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DEMZ | FSELX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.17% | -82.54% | +55.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.28% | -14.38% | +2.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.69% | -36.31% | +17.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.17% | -46.37% | +19.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -46.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.46% | 0.00% | -2.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.06% | -28.67% | +22.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.31% | 4.00% | -0.69% |
Volatility
DEMZ vs. FSELX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Democratic Large Cap Core ETF (DEMZ) is 5.45%, while Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio (FSELX) has a volatility of 17.93%. This indicates that DEMZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSELX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DEMZ | FSELX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.45% | 17.93% | -12.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.77% | 28.90% | -17.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.68% | 35.97% | -21.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.93% | 39.57% | -21.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.50% | 35.41% | -17.91% |
DEMZ vs. FSELX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DEMZ has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than FSELX's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
DEMZ vs. FSELX - Dividend Comparison
DEMZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, less than FSELX's 8.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DEMZ Democratic Large Cap Core ETF | 0.90% | 0.98% | 0.53% | 0.90% | 0.98% | 2.46% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FSELX Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio | 8.66% | 11.11% | 7.97% | 7.20% | 6.69% | 6.99% | 8.13% | 3.36% | 26.80% | 14.44% | 3.82% | 15.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DEMZ and FSELX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FSELX has higher volatility (17.93%) compared to DEMZ (5.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DEMZ dropped -27.17% vs FSELX's -82.54%.
FSELX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.48 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DEMZ and FSELX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer