PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DEMR.L vs. HMEF.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DEMR.L vs. HMEF.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income UCITS ETF (DEMR.L) and HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (HMEF.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

DEMR.L is traded in USD, while HMEF.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the HMEF.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DEMR.L achieves a 19.39% return, which is significantly lower than HMEF.L's 27.33% return.


DEMR.L

1D
-1.03%
1M
5.88%
YTD
19.39%
6M
20.08%
1Y
31.18%
3Y*
19.53%
5Y*
9.91%
10Y*

HMEF.L

1D
-1.18%
1M
9.42%
YTD
27.33%
6M
30.42%
1Y
54.16%
3Y*
21.38%
5Y*
4.96%
10Y*
8.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DEMR.L vs. HMEF.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DEMR.L
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income UCITS ETF
19.39%20.63%5.41%21.41%-13.08%13.97%-6.44%18.38%-7.94%26.61%
HMEF.L
HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD
27.33%31.08%4.66%5.11%-21.94%-4.97%16.13%14.77%-16.44%35.32%

Correlation

The correlation between DEMR.L and HMEF.L is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2016

0.82

The correlation between DEMR.L and HMEF.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

DEMR.L vs. HMEF.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DEMR.L
HMEF.L

Financial Services

25.5%
17.8%

Technology

16.7%
42.9%

Industrials

11.7%
6.8%

Consumer Defensive

8.9%
2.7%

Consumer Cyclical

8.7%
8.7%

Basic Materials

6.5%
5.9%

Communication Services

5.5%
6.2%

Real Estate

5.0%
1.0%

Utilities

4.8%
1.9%

Energy

4.8%
3.5%

Healthcare

2.0%
2.6%

Financial Services

DEMR.L
25.5%
HMEF.L
17.8%

Technology

DEMR.L
16.7%
HMEF.L
42.9%

Industrials

DEMR.L
11.7%
HMEF.L
6.8%

Consumer Defensive

DEMR.L
8.9%
HMEF.L
2.7%

Consumer Cyclical

DEMR.L
8.7%
HMEF.L
8.7%

Basic Materials

DEMR.L
6.5%
HMEF.L
5.9%

Communication Services

DEMR.L
5.5%
HMEF.L
6.2%

Real Estate

DEMR.L
5.0%
HMEF.L
1.0%

Utilities

DEMR.L
4.8%
HMEF.L
1.9%

Energy

DEMR.L
4.8%
HMEF.L
3.5%

Healthcare

DEMR.L
2.0%
HMEF.L
2.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DEMR.L vs. HMEF.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DEMR.L
DEMR.L Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
DEMR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DEMR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
DEMR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
DEMR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
DEMR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

HMEF.L
HMEF.L Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
HMEF.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HMEF.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
HMEF.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
HMEF.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
HMEF.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DEMR.L vs. HMEF.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income UCITS ETF (DEMR.L) and HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (HMEF.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DEMR.LHMEF.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.51

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.12

4.12

0.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.19

14.89

-1.70

DEMR.L vs. HMEF.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DEMR.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is comparable to the HMEF.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DEMR.L and HMEF.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DEMR.LHMEF.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.21

2.85

-0.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.27

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.20

+0.36

Drawdowns

DEMR.L vs. HMEF.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DEMR.L drawdown since its inception was -36.98%, smaller than the maximum HMEF.L drawdown of -42.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEMR.L and HMEF.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DEMR.LHMEF.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.98%

-42.58%

+5.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.54%

-13.08%

+5.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.84%

-17.13%

+2.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.86%

-39.72%

+11.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.03%

-1.18%

+0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.67%

-16.39%

+8.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.36%

3.63%

-1.27%

Volatility

DEMR.L vs. HMEF.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income UCITS ETF (DEMR.L) is 5.74%, while HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (HMEF.L) has a volatility of 8.08%. This indicates that DEMR.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HMEF.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DEMR.LHMEF.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.74%

8.08%

-2.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.00%

16.22%

-5.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.06%

18.91%

-4.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.16%

18.65%

-3.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.98%

19.40%

-2.42%

DEMR.L vs. HMEF.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

DEMR.L has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than HMEF.L's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

DEMR.L vs. HMEF.L - Dividend Comparison

DEMR.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HMEF.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DEMR.L
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HMEF.L
HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD
0.02%0.02%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.02%0.02%0.02%0.02%0.02%0.02%0.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


DEMR.L and HMEF.L have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HMEF.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HMEF.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for DEMR.L.

DEMR.L tracks WisdomTree Emerging Markets High Dividend Index, while HMEF.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for DEMR.L and 0.15% for HMEF.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DEMR.L and HMEF.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer