DEMR.L vs. 3USL.L
DEMR.L (WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income UCITS ETF) and 3USL.L (WisdomTree S&P 500 3x Daily Leveraged GB) are both exchange-traded funds - DEMR.L is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree Emerging Markets High Dividend Index, while 3USL.L is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Net Total Returns Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DEMR.L returned 9.91%/yr vs 22.25%/yr for 3USL.L. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DEMR.L charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for 3USL.L.
Performance
DEMR.L vs. 3USL.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DEMR.L achieves a 19.39% return, which is significantly lower than 3USL.L's 25.15% return.
DEMR.L
- 1D
- -1.03%
- 1M
- 5.88%
- YTD
- 19.39%
- 6M
- 20.08%
- 1Y
- 31.18%
- 3Y*
- 19.53%
- 5Y*
- 9.91%
- 10Y*
- —
3USL.L
- 1D
- -1.80%
- 1M
- 12.47%
- YTD
- 25.15%
- 6M
- 26.35%
- 1Y
- 79.45%
- 3Y*
- 50.92%
- 5Y*
- 22.25%
- 10Y*
- 28.84%
DEMR.L vs. 3USL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DEMR.L WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income UCITS ETF | 19.39% | 20.63% | 5.41% | 21.41% | -13.08% | 13.97% | -6.44% | 18.38% | -7.94% | 26.61% |
3USL.L WisdomTree S&P 500 3x Daily Leveraged GB | 25.15% | 28.97% | 64.00% | 70.49% | -57.35% | 101.77% | 7.89% | 97.98% | -27.34% | 69.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between DEMR.L and 3USL.L is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2016 | 0.61 |
The correlation between DEMR.L and 3USL.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.
DEMR.L vs. 3USL.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DEMR.L
3USL.L
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Real Estate
Utilities
Energy
Healthcare
Financial Services
DEMR.L
3USL.L
Technology
DEMR.L
3USL.L
Industrials
DEMR.L
3USL.L
Consumer Defensive
DEMR.L
3USL.L
Consumer Cyclical
DEMR.L
3USL.L
Basic Materials
DEMR.L
3USL.L
Communication Services
DEMR.L
3USL.L
Real Estate
DEMR.L
3USL.L
Utilities
DEMR.L
3USL.L
Energy
DEMR.L
3USL.L
Healthcare
DEMR.L
3USL.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DEMR.L vs. 3USL.L — Risk / Return Rank
DEMR.L
3USL.L
DEMR.L vs. 3USL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income UCITS ETF (DEMR.L) and WisdomTree S&P 500 3x Daily Leveraged GB (3USL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DEMR.L | 3USL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.36 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.12 | 3.12 | +0.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.19 | 12.55 | +0.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DEMR.L | 3USL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.21 | 2.30 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 | 0.47 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.60 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
DEMR.L vs. 3USL.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DEMR.L drawdown since its inception was -36.98%, smaller than the maximum 3USL.L drawdown of -76.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEMR.L and 3USL.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DEMR.L | 3USL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.98% | -76.72% | +39.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.54% | -25.29% | +17.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.84% | -48.69% | +33.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.86% | -63.47% | +35.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -76.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.03% | -1.80% | +0.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.67% | -15.26% | +7.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.36% | 6.31% | -3.95% |
Volatility
DEMR.L vs. 3USL.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income UCITS ETF (DEMR.L) is 5.74%, while WisdomTree S&P 500 3x Daily Leveraged GB (3USL.L) has a volatility of 9.44%. This indicates that DEMR.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 3USL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DEMR.L | 3USL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.74% | 9.44% | -3.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.00% | 25.27% | -14.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.06% | 34.49% | -20.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.16% | 47.39% | -32.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.98% | 48.51% | -31.53% |
DEMR.L vs. 3USL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
DEMR.L has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than 3USL.L's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
DEMR.L vs. 3USL.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither DEMR.L nor 3USL.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
DEMR.L and 3USL.L have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DEMR.L is cheaper at 0.46% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DEMR.L is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for 3USL.L.
DEMR.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while 3USL.L is Leveraged Equities. DEMR.L tracks WisdomTree Emerging Markets High Dividend Index, while 3USL.L tracks S&P 500 Net Total Returns Index. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for DEMR.L and 0.75% for 3USL.L.
Find the right allocation for DEMR.L and 3USL.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer