PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DEMGX vs. DFSVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DEMGX vs. DFSVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA Emerging Markets Targeted Value Portfolio (DEMGX) and DFA U.S. Small Cap Value Portfolio I (DFSVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with DEMGX having a 16.94% return and DFSVX slightly lower at 16.32%.


DEMGX

1D
-0.07%
1M
3.54%
YTD
16.94%
6M
18.72%
1Y
34.76%
3Y*
18.71%
5Y*
8.05%
10Y*

DFSVX

1D
0.96%
1M
2.50%
YTD
16.32%
6M
15.74%
1Y
34.94%
3Y*
18.16%
5Y*
10.22%
10Y*
11.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DEMGX vs. DFSVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
DEMGX
DFA Emerging Markets Targeted Value Portfolio
16.94%24.27%4.62%17.19%-12.98%14.64%8.55%11.08%0.38%
DFSVX
DFA U.S. Small Cap Value Portfolio I
16.32%8.37%9.58%19.02%-3.57%39.97%2.24%18.15%-11.76%

Correlation

The correlation between DEMGX and DFSVX is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 15, 2018

0.53

The correlation between DEMGX and DFSVX shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (1 year) to 0.53 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DEMGX vs. DFSVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DEMGX
DEMGX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
DEMGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DEMGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
DEMGX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
DEMGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
DEMGX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

DFSVX
DFSVX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
DFSVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFSVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFSVX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
DFSVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFSVX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DEMGX vs. DFSVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA Emerging Markets Targeted Value Portfolio (DEMGX) and DFA U.S. Small Cap Value Portfolio I (DFSVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DEMGXDFSVXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.57

2.15

+0.43

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.45

3.11

+0.34

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.38

+0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.19

3.93

-0.74

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.58

12.54

-0.96

DEMGX vs. DFSVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DEMGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.57, which is comparable to the DFSVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DEMGX and DFSVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DEMGXDFSVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.57

2.15

+0.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.48

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

0.53

+0.16

Drawdowns

DEMGX vs. DFSVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DEMGX drawdown since its inception was -42.40%, smaller than the maximum DFSVX drawdown of -66.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEMGX and DFSVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DEMGXDFSVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.40%

-66.70%

+24.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.10%

-9.59%

-1.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.68%

-27.69%

+10.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.19%

-27.69%

+1.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.07%

0.00%

-0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.58%

-9.47%

+1.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.04%

2.99%

+0.05%

Volatility

DEMGX vs. DFSVX - Volatility Comparison

DFA Emerging Markets Targeted Value Portfolio (DEMGX) has a higher volatility of 4.93% compared to DFA U.S. Small Cap Value Portfolio I (DFSVX) at 4.26%. This indicates that DEMGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFSVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DEMGXDFSVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.93%

4.26%

+0.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.30%

11.34%

-0.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.74%

17.53%

-3.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.45%

21.49%

-8.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.76%

23.90%

-8.14%

DEMGX vs. DFSVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DEMGX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than DFSVX's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

DEMGX vs. DFSVX - Dividend Comparison

DEMGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.26%, more than DFSVX's 1.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DEMGX
DFA Emerging Markets Targeted Value Portfolio
4.26%4.98%4.60%5.21%4.28%10.93%2.23%3.17%0.08%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DFSVX
DFA U.S. Small Cap Value Portfolio I
1.50%1.69%1.47%3.67%6.77%10.40%1.96%2.83%7.54%5.18%4.18%5.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


DEMGX and DFSVX have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DEMGX has higher volatility (4.93%) compared to DFSVX (4.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DEMGX dropped -42.40% vs DFSVX's -66.70%.

DEMGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DEMGX and DFSVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer