PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DEMGX vs. FEDDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DEMGX vs. FEDDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA Emerging Markets Targeted Value Portfolio (DEMGX) and Fidelity Emerging Markets Discovery Fund (FEDDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DEMGX achieves a 16.40% return, which is significantly lower than FEDDX's 20.26% return.


DEMGX

1D
-0.33%
1M
2.37%
YTD
16.40%
6M
16.49%
1Y
31.91%
3Y*
18.23%
5Y*
8.36%
10Y*

FEDDX

1D
-1.03%
1M
0.87%
YTD
20.26%
6M
21.65%
1Y
38.77%
3Y*
18.51%
5Y*
8.75%
10Y*
11.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DEMGX vs. FEDDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
DEMGX
DFA Emerging Markets Targeted Value Portfolio
16.40%24.27%4.62%17.19%-12.98%14.64%8.55%11.08%0.38%
FEDDX
Fidelity Emerging Markets Discovery Fund
20.26%31.90%-3.68%20.76%-11.83%6.65%16.96%19.60%1.03%

Correlation

The correlation between DEMGX and FEDDX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 2018

0.87

The correlation between DEMGX and FEDDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DEMGX vs. FEDDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DEMGX
DEMGX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
DEMGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DEMGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
DEMGX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
DEMGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
DEMGX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

FEDDX
FEDDX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
FEDDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEDDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEDDX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
FEDDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEDDX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DEMGX vs. FEDDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA Emerging Markets Targeted Value Portfolio (DEMGX) and Fidelity Emerging Markets Discovery Fund (FEDDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DEMGXFEDDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.52

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.98

4.17

-1.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.65

15.48

-4.84

DEMGX vs. FEDDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DEMGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.27, which is comparable to the FEDDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DEMGX and FEDDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DEMGX vs. FEDDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DEMGX drawdown since its inception was -42.40%, roughly equal to the maximum FEDDX drawdown of -42.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEMGX and FEDDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DEMGXFEDDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.40%

-42.95%

+0.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.10%

-9.54%

-1.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.68%

-17.29%

-0.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.55%

-27.45%

+1.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.85%

-1.70%

+0.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.54%

-8.75%

+1.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.10%

2.56%

+0.54%

Volatility

DEMGX vs. FEDDX - Volatility Comparison

DFA Emerging Markets Targeted Value Portfolio (DEMGX) and Fidelity Emerging Markets Discovery Fund (FEDDX) have volatilities of 6.54% and 6.29%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DEMGXFEDDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.54%

6.29%

+0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.60%

11.85%

+0.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.65%

14.14%

+0.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.67%

14.29%

-0.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.84%

15.80%

+0.04%

DEMGX vs. FEDDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DEMGX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than FEDDX's 1.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

DEMGX vs. FEDDX - Dividend Comparison

DEMGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.28%, more than FEDDX's 3.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DEMGX
DFA Emerging Markets Targeted Value Portfolio
4.28%4.98%4.60%5.21%4.28%10.93%2.23%3.17%0.08%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FEDDX
Fidelity Emerging Markets Discovery Fund
3.87%4.65%3.99%2.05%1.69%11.90%0.59%1.05%1.88%1.50%1.36%0.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


DEMGX and FEDDX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DEMGX has higher volatility (6.54%) compared to FEDDX (6.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DEMGX dropped -42.40% vs FEDDX's -42.95%.

FEDDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.82 vs 2.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DEMGX and FEDDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer