PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DEMGX vs. DEMSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DEMGX vs. DEMSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA Emerging Markets Targeted Value Portfolio (DEMGX) and DFA Emerging Markets Small Cap Portfolio (DEMSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DEMGX achieves a 17.01% return, which is significantly higher than DEMSX's 11.52% return.


DEMGX

1D
0.93%
1M
4.11%
YTD
17.01%
6M
18.89%
1Y
34.97%
3Y*
18.74%
5Y*
8.01%
10Y*

DEMSX

1D
0.51%
1M
1.20%
YTD
11.52%
6M
12.50%
1Y
24.34%
3Y*
14.90%
5Y*
7.01%
10Y*
9.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DEMGX vs. DEMSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
DEMGX
DFA Emerging Markets Targeted Value Portfolio
17.01%24.27%4.62%17.19%-12.98%14.64%8.55%11.08%0.38%
DEMSX
DFA Emerging Markets Small Cap Portfolio
11.52%19.01%4.92%16.32%-15.30%19.54%13.82%14.89%1.85%

Correlation

The correlation between DEMGX and DEMSX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 15, 2018

0.97

The correlation between DEMGX and DEMSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DEMGX vs. DEMSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DEMGX
DEMGX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
DEMGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DEMGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
DEMGX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
DEMGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
DEMGX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

DEMSX
DEMSX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
DEMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DEMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
DEMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
DEMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
DEMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DEMGX vs. DEMSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA Emerging Markets Targeted Value Portfolio (DEMGX) and DFA Emerging Markets Small Cap Portfolio (DEMSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DEMGXDEMSXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.61

1.91

+0.71

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.49

2.63

+0.87

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.36

+0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.18

2.37

+0.81

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.63

8.47

+3.17

DEMGX vs. DEMSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DEMGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is higher than the DEMSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DEMGX and DEMSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DEMGXDEMSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.61

1.91

+0.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.53

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

0.61

+0.07

Drawdowns

DEMGX vs. DEMSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DEMGX drawdown since its inception was -42.40%, smaller than the maximum DEMSX drawdown of -66.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEMGX and DEMSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DEMGXDEMSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.40%

-66.70%

+24.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.10%

-10.30%

-0.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.68%

-17.21%

-0.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.19%

-24.40%

-1.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.86%

+1.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.59%

-13.60%

+6.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.04%

2.88%

+0.16%

Volatility

DEMGX vs. DEMSX - Volatility Comparison

DFA Emerging Markets Targeted Value Portfolio (DEMGX) and DFA Emerging Markets Small Cap Portfolio (DEMSX) have volatilities of 4.92% and 4.74%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DEMGXDEMSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.92%

4.74%

+0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.30%

10.99%

+0.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.77%

13.24%

+0.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.46%

13.29%

+0.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.77%

14.80%

+0.97%

DEMGX vs. DEMSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DEMGX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than DEMSX's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

DEMGX vs. DEMSX - Dividend Comparison

DEMGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.25%, more than DEMSX's 3.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DEMGX
DFA Emerging Markets Targeted Value Portfolio
4.25%4.98%4.60%5.21%4.28%10.93%2.23%3.17%0.08%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DEMSX
DFA Emerging Markets Small Cap Portfolio
3.42%3.79%3.27%2.94%4.47%10.20%2.25%3.11%5.02%3.41%3.74%3.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, DEMGX and DEMSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DEMGX has higher volatility (4.92%) compared to DEMSX (4.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DEMGX dropped -42.40% vs DEMSX's -66.70%.

DEMGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DEMGX and DEMSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer