PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DEMCX vs. COBYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DEMCX vs. COBYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nomura Emerging Markets Fund Class C (DEMCX) and The Cook & Bynum Fund (COBYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DEMCX achieves a 67.60% return, which is significantly higher than COBYX's 11.82% return. Over the past 10 years, DEMCX has outperformed COBYX with an annualized return of 16.80%, while COBYX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.78% annualized return.


DEMCX

1D
8.32%
1M
-18.28%
6M
33.85%
YTD
67.60%
1Y
153.43%
3Y*
49.76%
5Y*
21.94%
10Y*
16.80%
ALL TIME*
9.70%

COBYX

1D
0.46%
1M
0.41%
6M
8.19%
YTD
11.82%
1Y
20.62%
3Y*
7.48%
5Y*
9.02%
10Y*
4.78%
ALL TIME*
4.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

DEMCX vs. COBYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DEMCX
Nomura Emerging Markets Fund Class C
67.60%84.86%5.47%16.47%-29.38%-3.05%24.55%23.16%-17.94%40.59%
COBYX
The Cook & Bynum Fund
11.82%20.50%-10.32%16.73%9.28%9.05%-10.97%9.40%-13.40%15.12%

Correlation

The correlation between DEMCX and COBYX is 0.14, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.37

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2013

0.47

Over the past year, the correlation between DEMCX and COBYX has dropped to 0.14 - well below their long-term average of 0.47, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DEMCX vs. COBYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DEMCX
DEMCX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
DEMCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DEMCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
DEMCX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
DEMCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
DEMCX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

COBYX
COBYX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
COBYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COBYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
COBYX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
COBYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
COBYX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DEMCX vs. COBYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nomura Emerging Markets Fund Class C (DEMCX) and The Cook & Bynum Fund (COBYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DEMCXCOBYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.30

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.98

2.17

+1.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.56

7.33

+9.23

DEMCX vs. COBYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DEMCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.75, which is higher than the COBYX Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DEMCX and COBYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DEMCX vs. COBYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DEMCX drawdown since its inception was -63.54%, which is greater than COBYX's maximum drawdown of -34.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEMCX and COBYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DEMCXCOBYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.54%

-34.18%

-29.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.58%

-8.95%

-27.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.58%

-16.29%

-20.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.96%

-17.10%

-21.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.21%

-34.18%

-13.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-31.31%

-0.15%

-31.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.59%

-6.74%

-12.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.76%

2.68%

+6.08%

Volatility

DEMCX vs. COBYX - Volatility Comparison

Nomura Emerging Markets Fund Class C (DEMCX) has a higher volatility of 25.07% compared to The Cook & Bynum Fund (COBYX) at 3.16%. This indicates that DEMCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COBYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DEMCXCOBYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.07%

3.16%

+21.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

49.53%

9.77%

+39.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

52.91%

11.82%

+41.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.11%

13.96%

+16.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.79%

13.67%

+12.12%

DEMCX vs. COBYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DEMCX has a 2.17% expense ratio, which is higher than COBYX's 1.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

DEMCX vs. COBYX - Dividend Comparison

DEMCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.22%, more than COBYX's 1.05% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
COBYX
The Cook & Bynum Fund
1.05%1.18%0.00%1.01%1.16%2.18%0.32%0.69%12.60%1.88%5.09%
DEMCX
Nomura Emerging Markets Fund Class C
12.22%20.47%1.09%2.03%0.69%2.58%0.61%0.00%0.00%1.03%0.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


DEMCX and COBYX have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DEMCX has higher volatility (25.07%) compared to COBYX (3.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DEMCX dropped -63.54% vs COBYX's -34.18%.

DEMCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DEMCX and COBYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer