PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DEHP vs. HEEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DEHP vs. HEEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional Emerging Markets High Profitability ETF (DEHP) and iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (HEEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DEHP achieves a 35.45% return, which is significantly higher than HEEM's 30.24% return.


DEHP

1D
-1.18%
1M
10.85%
YTD
35.45%
6M
39.02%
1Y
66.88%
3Y*
25.54%
5Y*
10Y*

HEEM

1D
-0.64%
1M
10.04%
YTD
30.24%
6M
32.57%
1Y
63.91%
3Y*
27.05%
5Y*
10.42%
10Y*
11.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DEHP vs. HEEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
DEHP
Dimensional Emerging Markets High Profitability ETF
35.45%32.86%4.47%12.31%-9.73%
HEEM
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
30.24%34.02%12.59%10.14%-5.49%

Correlation

The correlation between DEHP and HEEM is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2022

0.92

The correlation between DEHP and HEEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

DEHP vs. HEEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DEHP
HEEM

Technology

41.3%
37.0%

Communication Services

11.4%
6.9%

Industrials

11.4%
7.5%

Consumer Cyclical

9.0%
9.6%

Basic Materials

7.7%
6.5%

Financial Services

6.5%
19.4%

Energy

5.0%
4.0%

Consumer Defensive

4.3%
3.0%

Healthcare

2.5%
2.9%

Utilities

0.6%
2.1%

Real Estate

0.4%
1.1%

Technology

DEHP
41.3%
HEEM
37.0%

Communication Services

DEHP
11.4%
HEEM
6.9%

Industrials

DEHP
11.4%
HEEM
7.5%

Consumer Cyclical

DEHP
9.0%
HEEM
9.6%

Basic Materials

DEHP
7.7%
HEEM
6.5%

Financial Services

DEHP
6.5%
HEEM
19.4%

Energy

DEHP
5.0%
HEEM
4.0%

Consumer Defensive

DEHP
4.3%
HEEM
3.0%

Healthcare

DEHP
2.5%
HEEM
2.9%

Utilities

DEHP
0.6%
HEEM
2.1%

Real Estate

DEHP
0.4%
HEEM
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DEHP vs. HEEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DEHP
DEHP Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
DEHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DEHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
DEHP Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
DEHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
DEHP Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

HEEM
HEEM Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
HEEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HEEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
HEEM Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
HEEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
HEEM Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DEHP vs. HEEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Emerging Markets High Profitability ETF (DEHP) and iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (HEEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DEHPHEEMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

1.68

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.11

5.93

-0.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.55

23.76

-3.21

DEHP vs. HEEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DEHP Sharpe Ratio is 3.21, which is comparable to the HEEM Sharpe Ratio of 3.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DEHP and HEEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DEHPHEEMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.21

3.64

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.92

0.49

+0.43

Drawdowns

DEHP vs. HEEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DEHP drawdown since its inception was -22.90%, smaller than the maximum HEEM drawdown of -33.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEHP and HEEM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DEHPHEEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.90%

-33.53%

+10.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.16%

-10.83%

-2.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.14%

-14.82%

-4.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.18%

-0.64%

-0.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.75%

-11.14%

+5.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.26%

2.70%

+0.56%

Volatility

DEHP vs. HEEM - Volatility Comparison

Dimensional Emerging Markets High Profitability ETF (DEHP) has a higher volatility of 9.93% compared to iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (HEEM) at 7.57%. This indicates that DEHP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HEEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DEHPHEEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.93%

7.57%

+2.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.56%

15.37%

+3.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.97%

17.67%

+3.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.62%

17.01%

+1.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.62%

17.97%

+0.65%

DEHP vs. HEEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

DEHP has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is lower than HEEM's 0.72% expense ratio.


Dividends

DEHP vs. HEEM - Dividend Comparison

DEHP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%, less than HEEM's 3.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DEHP
Dimensional Emerging Markets High Profitability ETF
1.32%1.73%2.44%2.84%1.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HEEM
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
3.05%3.98%2.38%2.75%7.49%1.93%1.49%3.04%2.37%2.05%1.84%6.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, DEHP and HEEM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DEHP has higher volatility (9.93%) compared to HEEM (7.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DEHP dropped -22.90% vs HEEM's -33.53%.

On 3-year performance, HEEM leads with 27.05% vs 25.54% for DEHP. On fees, DEHP is cheaper at 0.41% per year. On volatility, HEEM has been the lower-risk option at 7.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, HEEM has performed better with a 27.05% return vs 25.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DEHP is cheaper with a 0.41% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for HEEM.

HEEM has the higher dividend yield at 3.05%, compared with 1.32% for DEHP.

They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.41% for DEHP and 0.72% for HEEM.

HEEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.64 vs 3.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DEHP and HEEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer