DEHP vs. DGCB

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

DEHP (Dimensional Emerging Markets High Profitability ETF) and DGCB (Dimensional Global Credit ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DEHP is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund actively managed by Dimensional, while DGCB is a Global Bonds fund actively managed by Dimensional. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, DEHP returned 55.70% vs 4.49% for DGCB. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DEHP charges 0.41%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for DGCB.

Performance

DEHP vs. DGCB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional Emerging Markets High Profitability ETF (DEHP) and Dimensional Global Credit ETF (DGCB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DEHP achieves a 29.64% return, which is significantly higher than DGCB's 0.87% return.

DEHP

• 1D: -7.10%
• 1M: 2.07%
• YTD: 29.64%
• 6M: 30.69%
• 1Y: 55.70%
• 3Y*: 23.77%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DGCB

• 1D: -0.59%
• 1M: 0.18%
• YTD: 0.87%
• 6M: 0.98%
• 1Y: 4.49%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DEHP vs. DGCB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
DEHP Dimensional Emerging Markets High Profitability ETF	29.64%	32.86%	4.47%	5.61%
DGCB Dimensional Global Credit ETF	0.87%	6.68%	3.80%	6.14%

Correlation

The correlation between DEHP and DGCB is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.40
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2023	0.26

The correlation between DEHP and DGCB shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (all time) to 0.40 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

DEHP vs. DGCB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DEHP

DEHP Risk / Return Rank: 78
DEHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
DEHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
DEHP Omega Ratio Rank: 79
DEHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
DEHP Martin Ratio Rank: 84

DGCB

DGCB Risk / Return Rank: 33
DGCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
DGCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
DGCB Omega Ratio Rank: 31
DGCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
DGCB Martin Ratio Rank: 36

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DEHP vs. DGCB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Emerging Markets High Profitability ETF (DEHP) and Dimensional Global Credit ETF (DGCB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DEHP	DGCB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.27	1.12	+1.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.83	1.63	+1.20
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.20	+0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.25	1.47	+2.79
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.97	5.10	+10.87

DEHP vs. DGCB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DEHP Sharpe Ratio is 2.27, which is higher than the DGCB Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DEHP and DGCB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DEHP vs. DGCB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DEHP drawdown since its inception was -22.90%, which is greater than DGCB's maximum drawdown of -3.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEHP and DGCB.

Drawdown Indicators

	DEHP	DGCB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.90%	-3.50%	-19.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.16%	-3.08%	-10.08%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.14%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.10%	-0.99%	-6.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.73%	-0.80%	-4.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.50%	0.88%	+2.62%

Volatility

DEHP vs. DGCB - Volatility Comparison

Dimensional Emerging Markets High Profitability ETF (DEHP) has a higher volatility of 15.13% compared to Dimensional Global Credit ETF (DGCB) at 1.35%. This indicates that DEHP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGCB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DEHP	DGCB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.13%	1.35%	+13.78%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.85%	3.36%	+19.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.71%	4.02%	+20.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.61%	4.83%	+14.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.61%	4.83%	+14.78%

DEHP vs. DGCB - Expense Ratio Comparison

DEHP has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is higher than DGCB's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

DEHP vs. DGCB - Dividend Comparison

DEHP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, less than DGCB's 3.23% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
DEHP Dimensional Emerging Markets High Profitability ETF	0.89%	1.73%	2.44%	2.84%	1.65%
DGCB Dimensional Global Credit ETF	3.23%	3.43%	4.72%	0.63%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DEHP and DGCB in my portfolio?

DEHP and DGCB have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DEHP or DGCB?

DEHP has higher volatility (15.13%) compared to DGCB (1.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DEHP dropped -22.90% vs DGCB's -3.50%.

Which ETF is better, DEHP or DGCB?

On 1-year performance, DEHP leads with 55.70% vs 4.49% for DGCB. On fees, DGCB is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, DGCB has been the lower-risk option at 1.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DEHP or DGCB?

Over the 1-year period, DEHP has performed better with a 55.70% return vs 4.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DEHP or DGCB?

DGCB is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.41% for DEHP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DEHP or DGCB?

DGCB has the higher dividend yield at 3.23%, compared with 1.38% for DEHP.

What is the main difference between DEHP and DGCB?

DEHP is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while DGCB is Global Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.41% for DEHP and 0.20% for DGCB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DEHP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.