DEF vs. VFMV
DEF (Invesco Defensive Equity ETF) and VFMV (Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DEF is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Invesco Defensive Equity Index, while VFMV is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Vanguard. DEF is passively managed, while VFMV is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, DEF returned 7.41%/yr vs 9.82%/yr for VFMV. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DEF charges 0.53%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for VFMV.
Performance
DEF vs. VFMV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DEF achieves a -2.29% return, which is significantly lower than VFMV's 8.53% return.
DEF
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.44%
- YTD
- -2.29%
- 6M
- -2.55%
- 1Y
- 4.21%
- 3Y*
- 10.86%
- 5Y*
- 7.41%
- 10Y*
- 10.28%
VFMV
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 1.30%
- YTD
- 8.53%
- 6M
- 8.37%
- 1Y
- 13.05%
- 3Y*
- 14.70%
- 5Y*
- 9.82%
- 10Y*
- —
DEF vs. VFMV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DEF Invesco Defensive Equity ETF | -2.29% | 11.71% | 13.18% | 10.58% | -7.67% | 24.93% | 7.61% | 27.98% | -4.79% |
VFMV Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF | 8.53% | 10.52% | 16.91% | 8.86% | -5.73% | 20.75% | -0.19% | 27.26% | -1.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between DEF and VFMV is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2018 | 0.89 |
The correlation between DEF and VFMV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
DEF vs. VFMV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DEF
VFMV
Healthcare
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Energy
Healthcare
DEF
VFMV
Financial Services
DEF
VFMV
Industrials
DEF
VFMV
Consumer Defensive
DEF
VFMV
Technology
DEF
VFMV
Consumer Cyclical
DEF
VFMV
Utilities
DEF
VFMV
Communication Services
DEF
VFMV
Real Estate
DEF
VFMV
Basic Materials
DEF
VFMV
-
Energy
DEF
VFMV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DEF vs. VFMV — Risk / Return Rank
DEF
VFMV
DEF vs. VFMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Defensive Equity ETF (DEF) and Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DEF | VFMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.26 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.43 | 2.18 | -1.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.18 | 8.57 | -7.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DEF | VFMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 | 1.49 | -1.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | 0.84 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.69 | -0.16 |
Drawdowns
DEF vs. VFMV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DEF drawdown since its inception was -47.91%, which is greater than VFMV's maximum drawdown of -33.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEF and VFMV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DEF | VFMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.91% | -33.64% | -14.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.76% | -6.00% | -3.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.00% | -10.35% | -4.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.75% | -15.41% | -2.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.53% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.44% | -1.02% | -5.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.24% | -3.64% | -2.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.59% | 1.53% | +2.06% |
Volatility
DEF vs. VFMV - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Defensive Equity ETF (DEF) has a higher volatility of 3.12% compared to Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV) at 2.09%. This indicates that DEF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VFMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DEF | VFMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.12% | 2.09% | +1.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.80% | 6.30% | +2.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.73% | 8.80% | +2.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.92% | 11.75% | +2.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.05% | 14.25% | +1.80% |
DEF vs. VFMV - Expense Ratio Comparison
DEF has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is higher than VFMV's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
DEF vs. VFMV - Dividend Comparison
DEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, less than VFMV's 1.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DEF Invesco Defensive Equity ETF | 0.96% | 0.94% | 0.79% | 1.60% | 1.48% | 1.06% | 1.34% | 1.16% | 1.39% | 1.63% | 2.18% | 3.31% |
VFMV Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF | 1.93% | 2.12% | 1.46% | 2.20% | 2.08% | 1.31% | 2.14% | 2.43% | 2.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DEF and VFMV have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DEF has higher volatility (3.12%) compared to VFMV (2.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DEF dropped -47.91% vs VFMV's -33.64%.
On 5-year performance, VFMV leads with 9.82% vs 7.41% for DEF. On fees, VFMV is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, VFMV has been the lower-risk option at 2.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VFMV has performed better with a 9.82% return vs 7.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VFMV is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.53% for DEF.
VFMV has the higher dividend yield at 1.93%, compared with 0.96% for DEF.
DEF is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while VFMV is Mid Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.53% for DEF and 0.13% for VFMV.
VFMV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DEF and VFMV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer