DEF vs. QUS
DEF (Invesco Defensive Equity ETF) and QUS (SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - DEF tracks the Invesco Defensive Equity Index while QUS tracks the MSCI USA Factor Mix A-Series Capped (USD). Both are passively managed. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DEF charges 0.53%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QUS.
Performance
DEF vs. QUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
DEF
- 1D
- -3.03%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QUS
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- -1.12%
- YTD
- 5.81%
- 6M
- 5.18%
- 1Y
- 16.61%
- 3Y*
- 16.79%
- 5Y*
- 10.77%
- 10Y*
- 13.70%
DEF vs. QUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
DEF Invesco Defensive Equity ETF | -11.11% |
QUS SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF | -0.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between DEF and QUS is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 8, 2026 | 0.43 |
DEF vs. QUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DEF
QUS
Healthcare
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Energy
Healthcare
DEF
QUS
Financial Services
DEF
QUS
Industrials
DEF
QUS
Consumer Defensive
DEF
QUS
Technology
DEF
QUS
Consumer Cyclical
DEF
QUS
Utilities
DEF
QUS
Communication Services
DEF
QUS
Real Estate
DEF
QUS
Basic Materials
DEF
QUS
Energy
DEF
QUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DEF vs. QUS — Risk / Return Rank
DEF
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QUS
DEF vs. QUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Defensive Equity ETF (DEF) and SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DEF | QUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.32 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.43 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.76 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DEF vs. QUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DEF drawdown since its inception was -11.11%, smaller than the maximum QUS drawdown of -33.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEF and QUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DEF | QUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.11% | -33.78% | +22.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.94% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.78% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.11% | -1.84% | -9.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.26% | -3.69% | -5.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.55% | — |
Volatility
DEF vs. QUS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DEF | QUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.84% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 6.98% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 66.96% | 9.24% | +57.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 66.96% | 14.34% | +52.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 66.96% | 16.43% | +50.53% |
DEF vs. QUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
DEF has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is higher than QUS's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
DEF vs. QUS - Dividend Comparison
DEF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DEF Invesco Defensive Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QUS SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF | 1.32% | 1.38% | 1.49% | 1.57% | 1.68% | 1.27% | 1.73% | 1.81% | 2.12% | 1.86% | 2.07% | 1.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DEF and QUS have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QUS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QUS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.53% for DEF.
QUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.32%, compared with 0.00% for DEF.
DEF tracks Invesco Defensive Equity Index, while QUS tracks MSCI USA Factor Mix A-Series Capped (USD). They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.53% for DEF and 0.15% for QUS.
Find the right allocation for DEF and QUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer