PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DEF vs. MFUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DEF vs. MFUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Defensive Equity ETF (DEF) and PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DEF achieves a -2.29% return, which is significantly lower than MFUS's 16.37% return.


DEF

1D
0.04%
1M
0.44%
YTD
-2.29%
6M
-2.55%
1Y
4.21%
3Y*
10.86%
5Y*
7.41%
10Y*
10.28%

MFUS

1D
0.03%
1M
5.72%
YTD
16.37%
6M
16.58%
1Y
28.04%
3Y*
22.25%
5Y*
12.82%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DEF vs. MFUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DEF
Invesco Defensive Equity ETF
-2.29%11.71%13.18%10.58%-7.67%24.93%7.61%27.98%-3.96%9.50%
MFUS
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF
16.37%16.02%20.17%12.19%-5.82%24.10%10.64%26.17%-7.30%11.20%

Correlation

The correlation between DEF and MFUS is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 2017

0.85

The correlation between DEF and MFUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

DEF vs. MFUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DEF
MFUS

Healthcare

16.8%
13.5%

Financial Services

16.1%
12.6%

Industrials

15.6%
12.6%

Consumer Defensive

12.9%
10.3%

Technology

12.1%
21.8%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
10.6%

Utilities

4.8%
1.7%

Communication Services

4.7%
5.3%

Real Estate

3.8%
1.8%

Basic Materials

2.1%
2.8%

Energy

1.0%
7.0%

Healthcare

DEF
16.8%
MFUS
13.5%

Financial Services

DEF
16.1%
MFUS
12.6%

Industrials

DEF
15.6%
MFUS
12.6%

Consumer Defensive

DEF
12.9%
MFUS
10.3%

Technology

DEF
12.1%
MFUS
21.8%

Consumer Cyclical

DEF
10.1%
MFUS
10.6%

Utilities

DEF
4.8%
MFUS
1.7%

Communication Services

DEF
4.7%
MFUS
5.3%

Real Estate

DEF
3.8%
MFUS
1.8%

Basic Materials

DEF
2.1%
MFUS
2.8%

Energy

DEF
1.0%
MFUS
7.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DEF vs. MFUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DEF
DEF Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
DEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
DEF Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
DEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
DEF Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

MFUS
MFUS Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
MFUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFUS Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
MFUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFUS Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DEF vs. MFUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Defensive Equity ETF (DEF) and PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DEFMFUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.47

-0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.43

4.41

-3.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.18

18.13

-16.95

DEF vs. MFUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DEF Sharpe Ratio is 0.36, which is lower than the MFUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DEF and MFUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DEFMFUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

2.63

-2.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.86

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.79

-0.25

Drawdowns

DEF vs. MFUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DEF drawdown since its inception was -47.91%, which is greater than MFUS's maximum drawdown of -35.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEF and MFUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DEFMFUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.91%

-35.21%

-12.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.76%

-6.39%

-3.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.00%

-15.39%

+0.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.75%

-18.22%

+0.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.44%

0.00%

-6.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.24%

-4.00%

-2.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.59%

1.55%

+2.04%

Volatility

DEF vs. MFUS - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Defensive Equity ETF (DEF) and PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS) have volatilities of 3.12% and 3.19%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DEFMFUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.12%

3.19%

-0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.80%

8.22%

+0.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.73%

10.72%

+1.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.92%

15.03%

-1.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.05%

17.35%

-1.30%

DEF vs. MFUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

DEF has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is higher than MFUS's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

DEF vs. MFUS - Dividend Comparison

DEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, less than MFUS's 1.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DEF
Invesco Defensive Equity ETF
0.96%0.94%0.79%1.60%1.48%1.06%1.34%1.16%1.39%1.63%2.18%3.31%
MFUS
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF
1.36%1.54%1.45%1.96%2.07%1.35%1.72%1.89%1.69%1.01%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DEF and MFUS have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MFUS has higher volatility (3.19%) compared to DEF (3.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DEF dropped -47.91% vs MFUS's -35.21%.

On 5-year performance, MFUS leads with 12.82% vs 7.41% for DEF. On fees, MFUS is cheaper at 0.30% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, MFUS has performed better with a 12.82% return vs 7.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MFUS is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.53% for DEF.

MFUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.36%, compared with 0.96% for DEF.

DEF tracks Invesco Defensive Equity Index, while MFUS tracks RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Index​. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.53% for DEF and 0.30% for MFUS.

MFUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DEF and MFUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer