PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DEF vs. MFUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DEF vs. MFUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Defensive Equity ETF (DEF) and PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


DEF

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

MFUS

1D
0.44%
1M
-0.34%
6M
10.78%
YTD
16.56%
1Y
25.93%
3Y*
19.97%
5Y*
13.05%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.69M$1.08M$961.02K

DEF vs. MFUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DEF and MFUS is 0.04, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 8, 2026

0.04

DEF vs. MFUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DEF
MFUS

Healthcare

16.8%
14.7%

Financial Services

16.1%
11.3%

Industrials

15.6%
12.5%

Consumer Defensive

12.9%
9.3%

Technology

12.1%
25.8%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
9.3%

Utilities

4.8%
1.3%

Communication Services

4.7%
4.6%

Real Estate

3.8%
2.0%

Basic Materials

2.1%
2.5%

Energy

1.0%
6.6%

Healthcare

DEF
16.8%
MFUS
14.7%

Financial Services

DEF
16.1%
MFUS
11.3%

Industrials

DEF
15.6%
MFUS
12.5%

Consumer Defensive

DEF
12.9%
MFUS
9.3%

Technology

DEF
12.1%
MFUS
25.8%

Consumer Cyclical

DEF
10.1%
MFUS
9.3%

Utilities

DEF
4.8%
MFUS
1.3%

Communication Services

DEF
4.7%
MFUS
4.6%

Real Estate

DEF
3.8%
MFUS
2.0%

Basic Materials

DEF
2.1%
MFUS
2.5%

Energy

DEF
1.0%
MFUS
6.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DEF vs. MFUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DEF

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


MFUS
MFUS Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
MFUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFUS Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
MFUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFUS Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DEF vs. MFUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Defensive Equity ETF (DEF) and PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DEFMFUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.40

DEF vs. MFUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DEF vs. MFUS - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DEFMFUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.69%

Volatility

DEF vs. MFUS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DEFMFUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.28%

DEF vs. MFUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

DEF has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is higher than MFUS's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

DEF vs. MFUS - Dividend Comparison

DEF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MFUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DEF
Invesco Defensive Equity ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MFUS
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF
1.37%1.54%1.45%1.96%2.07%1.35%1.72%1.89%1.69%1.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


DEF and MFUS have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MFUS is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MFUS is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.53% for DEF.

MFUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.37%, compared with 0.00% for DEF.

DEF tracks Invesco Defensive Equity Index, while MFUS tracks RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Index​. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.53% for DEF and 0.30% for MFUS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DEF and MFUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer