DEF vs. MFUS
DEF (Invesco Defensive Equity ETF) and MFUS (PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - DEF tracks the Invesco Defensive Equity Index while MFUS tracks the RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DEF returned 7.41%/yr vs 12.82%/yr for MFUS. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DEF charges 0.53%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for MFUS.
Performance
DEF vs. MFUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DEF achieves a -2.29% return, which is significantly lower than MFUS's 16.37% return.
DEF
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.44%
- YTD
- -2.29%
- 6M
- -2.55%
- 1Y
- 4.21%
- 3Y*
- 10.86%
- 5Y*
- 7.41%
- 10Y*
- 10.28%
MFUS
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 5.72%
- YTD
- 16.37%
- 6M
- 16.58%
- 1Y
- 28.04%
- 3Y*
- 22.25%
- 5Y*
- 12.82%
- 10Y*
- —
DEF vs. MFUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DEF Invesco Defensive Equity ETF | -2.29% | 11.71% | 13.18% | 10.58% | -7.67% | 24.93% | 7.61% | 27.98% | -3.96% | 9.50% |
MFUS PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF | 16.37% | 16.02% | 20.17% | 12.19% | -5.82% | 24.10% | 10.64% | 26.17% | -7.30% | 11.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between DEF and MFUS is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 2017 | 0.85 |
The correlation between DEF and MFUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
DEF vs. MFUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DEF
MFUS
Healthcare
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Energy
Healthcare
DEF
MFUS
Financial Services
DEF
MFUS
Industrials
DEF
MFUS
Consumer Defensive
DEF
MFUS
Technology
DEF
MFUS
Consumer Cyclical
DEF
MFUS
Utilities
DEF
MFUS
Communication Services
DEF
MFUS
Real Estate
DEF
MFUS
Basic Materials
DEF
MFUS
Energy
DEF
MFUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DEF vs. MFUS — Risk / Return Rank
DEF
MFUS
DEF vs. MFUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Defensive Equity ETF (DEF) and PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DEF | MFUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.47 | -0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.43 | 4.41 | -3.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.18 | 18.13 | -16.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DEF | MFUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 | 2.63 | -2.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | 0.86 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.79 | -0.25 |
Drawdowns
DEF vs. MFUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DEF drawdown since its inception was -47.91%, which is greater than MFUS's maximum drawdown of -35.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEF and MFUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DEF | MFUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.91% | -35.21% | -12.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.76% | -6.39% | -3.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.00% | -15.39% | +0.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.75% | -18.22% | +0.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.53% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.44% | 0.00% | -6.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.24% | -4.00% | -2.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.59% | 1.55% | +2.04% |
Volatility
DEF vs. MFUS - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Defensive Equity ETF (DEF) and PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS) have volatilities of 3.12% and 3.19%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DEF | MFUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.12% | 3.19% | -0.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.80% | 8.22% | +0.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.73% | 10.72% | +1.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.92% | 15.03% | -1.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.05% | 17.35% | -1.30% |
DEF vs. MFUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
DEF has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is higher than MFUS's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
DEF vs. MFUS - Dividend Comparison
DEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, less than MFUS's 1.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DEF Invesco Defensive Equity ETF | 0.96% | 0.94% | 0.79% | 1.60% | 1.48% | 1.06% | 1.34% | 1.16% | 1.39% | 1.63% | 2.18% | 3.31% |
MFUS PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF | 1.36% | 1.54% | 1.45% | 1.96% | 2.07% | 1.35% | 1.72% | 1.89% | 1.69% | 1.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DEF and MFUS have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MFUS has higher volatility (3.19%) compared to DEF (3.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DEF dropped -47.91% vs MFUS's -35.21%.
On 5-year performance, MFUS leads with 12.82% vs 7.41% for DEF. On fees, MFUS is cheaper at 0.30% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, MFUS has performed better with a 12.82% return vs 7.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MFUS is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.53% for DEF.
MFUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.36%, compared with 0.96% for DEF.
DEF tracks Invesco Defensive Equity Index, while MFUS tracks RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.53% for DEF and 0.30% for MFUS.
MFUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DEF and MFUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer