PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DEF vs. IUSG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DEF vs. IUSG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Defensive Equity ETF (DEF) and iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DEF achieves a -2.29% return, which is significantly lower than IUSG's 14.08% return. Over the past 10 years, DEF has underperformed IUSG with an annualized return of 10.28%, while IUSG has yielded a comparatively higher 17.88% annualized return.


DEF

1D
0.04%
1M
0.44%
YTD
-2.29%
6M
-2.55%
1Y
4.21%
3Y*
10.86%
5Y*
7.41%
10Y*
10.28%

IUSG

1D
-0.89%
1M
7.35%
YTD
14.08%
6M
13.91%
1Y
33.89%
3Y*
27.59%
5Y*
15.69%
10Y*
17.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DEF vs. IUSG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DEF
Invesco Defensive Equity ETF
-2.29%11.71%13.18%10.58%-7.67%24.93%7.61%27.98%-3.96%21.52%
IUSG
iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF
14.08%21.23%34.70%29.28%-28.81%31.26%32.65%30.62%-0.79%27.02%

Correlation

The correlation between DEF and IUSG is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2006

0.76

Over the past year, the correlation between DEF and IUSG has dropped to 0.52 - well below their long-term average of 0.76, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

DEF vs. IUSG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DEF
IUSG

Healthcare

16.8%
6.2%

Financial Services

16.1%
8.8%

Industrials

15.6%
7.5%

Consumer Defensive

12.9%
1.0%

Technology

12.1%
48.0%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
9.3%

Utilities

4.8%
0.5%

Communication Services

4.7%
17.1%

Real Estate

3.8%
0.9%

Basic Materials

2.1%
0.5%

Energy

1.0%
0.2%

Healthcare

DEF
16.8%
IUSG
6.2%

Financial Services

DEF
16.1%
IUSG
8.8%

Industrials

DEF
15.6%
IUSG
7.5%

Consumer Defensive

DEF
12.9%
IUSG
1.0%

Technology

DEF
12.1%
IUSG
48.0%

Consumer Cyclical

DEF
10.1%
IUSG
9.3%

Utilities

DEF
4.8%
IUSG
0.5%

Communication Services

DEF
4.7%
IUSG
17.1%

Real Estate

DEF
3.8%
IUSG
0.9%

Basic Materials

DEF
2.1%
IUSG
0.5%

Energy

DEF
1.0%
IUSG
0.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DEF vs. IUSG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DEF
DEF Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
DEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
DEF Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
DEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
DEF Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

IUSG
IUSG Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
IUSG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUSG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUSG Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
IUSG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUSG Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DEF vs. IUSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Defensive Equity ETF (DEF) and iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DEFIUSGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.37

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.43

2.61

-2.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.18

11.09

-9.91

DEF vs. IUSG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DEF Sharpe Ratio is 0.36, which is lower than the IUSG Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DEF and IUSG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DEFIUSGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

2.17

-1.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.76

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

0.88

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.38

+0.16

Drawdowns

DEF vs. IUSG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DEF drawdown since its inception was -47.91%, smaller than the maximum IUSG drawdown of -63.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEF and IUSG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DEFIUSGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.91%

-63.41%

+15.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.76%

-13.07%

+3.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.00%

-22.28%

+7.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.75%

-32.21%

+14.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.53%

-32.35%

-4.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.44%

-0.98%

-5.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.24%

-21.44%

+15.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.59%

3.06%

+0.53%

Volatility

DEF vs. IUSG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Defensive Equity ETF (DEF) is 3.12%, while iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG) has a volatility of 4.23%. This indicates that DEF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IUSG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DEFIUSGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.12%

4.23%

-1.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.80%

12.23%

-3.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.73%

15.72%

-3.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.92%

20.87%

-6.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.05%

20.40%

-4.35%

DEF vs. IUSG - Expense Ratio Comparison

DEF has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is higher than IUSG's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

DEF vs. IUSG - Dividend Comparison

DEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, more than IUSG's 0.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DEF
Invesco Defensive Equity ETF
0.96%0.94%0.79%1.60%1.48%1.06%1.34%1.16%1.39%1.63%2.18%3.31%
IUSG
iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF
0.47%0.53%0.59%1.12%1.07%0.59%0.93%1.64%1.32%1.28%1.48%1.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


DEF and IUSG have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IUSG has higher volatility (4.23%) compared to DEF (3.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DEF dropped -47.91% vs IUSG's -63.41%.

On 10-year performance, IUSG leads with 17.88% vs 10.28% for DEF. On fees, IUSG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, DEF has been the lower-risk option at 3.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IUSG has performed better with a 17.88% return vs 10.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IUSG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.53% for DEF.

DEF has the higher dividend yield at 0.96%, compared with 0.47% for IUSG.

DEF tracks Invesco Defensive Equity Index, while IUSG tracks Russell 3000 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.53% for DEF and 0.04% for IUSG.

IUSG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DEF and IUSG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer