DEF vs. HLAL
DEF (Invesco Defensive Equity ETF) and HLAL (Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - DEF tracks the Invesco Defensive Equity Index while HLAL tracks the FTSE Shariah USA Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DEF returned 7.41%/yr vs 15.86%/yr for HLAL. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DEF charges 0.53%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for HLAL.
Performance
DEF vs. HLAL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DEF achieves a -2.29% return, which is significantly lower than HLAL's 18.72% return.
DEF
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.44%
- YTD
- -2.29%
- 6M
- -2.55%
- 1Y
- 4.21%
- 3Y*
- 10.86%
- 5Y*
- 7.41%
- 10Y*
- 10.28%
HLAL
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 9.45%
- YTD
- 18.72%
- 6M
- 17.75%
- 1Y
- 43.63%
- 3Y*
- 22.04%
- 5Y*
- 15.86%
- 10Y*
- —
DEF vs. HLAL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DEF Invesco Defensive Equity ETF | -2.29% | 11.71% | 13.18% | 10.58% | -7.67% | 24.93% | 7.61% | 4.78% |
HLAL Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF | 18.72% | 18.30% | 16.70% | 30.13% | -17.56% | 28.64% | 24.65% | 10.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between DEF and HLAL is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2019 | 0.78 |
The correlation between DEF and HLAL shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.78 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
DEF vs. HLAL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DEF
HLAL
Healthcare
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Energy
Healthcare
DEF
HLAL
Financial Services
DEF
HLAL
Industrials
DEF
HLAL
Consumer Defensive
DEF
HLAL
Technology
DEF
HLAL
Consumer Cyclical
DEF
HLAL
Utilities
DEF
HLAL
Communication Services
DEF
HLAL
Real Estate
DEF
HLAL
Basic Materials
DEF
HLAL
Energy
DEF
HLAL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DEF vs. HLAL — Risk / Return Rank
DEF
HLAL
DEF vs. HLAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Defensive Equity ETF (DEF) and Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF (HLAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DEF | HLAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.59 | -0.52 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.43 | 4.30 | -3.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.18 | 19.85 | -18.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DEF | HLAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 | 3.33 | -2.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | 0.91 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.89 | -0.36 |
Drawdowns
DEF vs. HLAL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DEF drawdown since its inception was -47.91%, which is greater than HLAL's maximum drawdown of -33.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEF and HLAL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DEF | HLAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.91% | -33.57% | -14.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.76% | -10.20% | +0.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.00% | -21.67% | +6.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.75% | -23.18% | +5.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.53% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.44% | -0.07% | -6.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.24% | -5.00% | -1.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.59% | 2.20% | +1.39% |
Volatility
DEF vs. HLAL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Defensive Equity ETF (DEF) is 3.12%, while Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF (HLAL) has a volatility of 3.70%. This indicates that DEF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HLAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DEF | HLAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.12% | 3.70% | -0.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.80% | 9.95% | -1.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.73% | 13.17% | -1.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.92% | 17.60% | -3.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.05% | 20.21% | -4.16% |
DEF vs. HLAL - Expense Ratio Comparison
DEF has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is higher than HLAL's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
DEF vs. HLAL - Dividend Comparison
DEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, more than HLAL's 0.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DEF Invesco Defensive Equity ETF | 0.96% | 0.94% | 0.79% | 1.60% | 1.48% | 1.06% | 1.34% | 1.16% | 1.39% | 1.63% | 2.18% | 3.31% |
HLAL Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF | 0.44% | 0.53% | 0.58% | 0.72% | 1.15% | 0.78% | 0.97% | 0.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DEF and HLAL have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HLAL has higher volatility (3.70%) compared to DEF (3.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DEF dropped -47.91% vs HLAL's -33.57%.
On 5-year performance, HLAL leads with 15.86% vs 7.41% for DEF. On fees, HLAL is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, DEF has been the lower-risk option at 3.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, HLAL has performed better with a 15.86% return vs 7.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HLAL is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.53% for DEF.
DEF has the higher dividend yield at 0.96%, compared with 0.44% for HLAL.
DEF tracks Invesco Defensive Equity Index, while HLAL tracks FTSE Shariah USA Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Wahed. Their fees differ too: 0.53% for DEF and 0.50% for HLAL.
HLAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.33 vs 0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DEF and HLAL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer