DEF vs. GARY
DEF (Invesco Defensive Equity ETF) and GARY (Mango Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. DEF is passively managed, while GARY is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. DEF charges 0.53%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for GARY.
Performance
DEF vs. GARY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
DEF
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GARY
- 1D
- 1.12%
- 1M
- 1.12%
- 6M
- 24.74%
- YTD
- 31.48%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DEF vs. GARY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
DEF Invesco Defensive Equity ETF | -11.11% |
GARY Mango Growth ETF | 4.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between DEF and GARY is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 8, 2026 | -0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DEF vs. GARY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Defensive Equity ETF (DEF) and Mango Growth ETF (GARY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DEF vs. GARY - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DEF | GARY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -10.28% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -4.17% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -1.88% | — |
Volatility
DEF vs. GARY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DEF | GARY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 21.79% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 21.79% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 21.79% | — |
DEF vs. GARY - Expense Ratio Comparison
DEF has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is lower than GARY's 0.77% expense ratio.
Dividends
DEF vs. GARY - Dividend Comparison
DEF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GARY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
DEF Invesco Defensive Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GARY Mango Growth ETF | 0.04% | 0.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DEF and GARY have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DEF is cheaper at 0.53% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DEF is cheaper with a 0.53% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for GARY.
GARY has the higher dividend yield at 0.04%, compared with 0.00% for DEF.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Mango. Their fees differ too: 0.53% for DEF and 0.77% for GARY.
Find the right allocation for DEF and GARY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer