PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DEEP vs. VIOV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DEEP vs. VIOV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF (DEEP) and Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF (VIOV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DEEP achieves a 12.39% return, which is significantly lower than VIOV's 15.28% return. Over the past 10 years, DEEP has underperformed VIOV with an annualized return of 8.15%, while VIOV has yielded a comparatively higher 10.23% annualized return.


DEEP

1D
-2.02%
1M
0.72%
YTD
12.39%
6M
11.91%
1Y
27.76%
3Y*
9.78%
5Y*
3.74%
10Y*
8.15%

VIOV

1D
-1.28%
1M
2.26%
YTD
15.28%
6M
14.76%
1Y
37.06%
3Y*
14.29%
5Y*
5.75%
10Y*
10.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DEEP vs. VIOV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DEEP
Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF
12.39%5.69%-2.97%22.37%-17.71%35.66%-9.96%12.54%-7.17%27.19%
VIOV
Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF
15.28%6.63%7.44%15.36%-11.37%30.67%2.81%24.44%-12.85%11.54%

Correlation

The correlation between DEEP and VIOV is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2014

0.86

The correlation between DEEP and VIOV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

DEEP vs. VIOV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DEEP
VIOV

Industrials

25.8%
12.7%

Consumer Cyclical

25.5%
15.4%

Consumer Defensive

10.5%
3.8%

Financial Services

8.6%
19.8%

Technology

8.5%
10.6%

Healthcare

6.6%
7.5%

Energy

5.7%
9.1%

Basic Materials

4.8%
6.3%

Communication Services

4.1%
3.4%

Real Estate

3.1%
8.8%

Utilities

-

1.9%

Industrials

DEEP
25.8%
VIOV
12.7%

Consumer Cyclical

DEEP
25.5%
VIOV
15.4%

Consumer Defensive

DEEP
10.5%
VIOV
3.8%

Financial Services

DEEP
8.6%
VIOV
19.8%

Technology

DEEP
8.5%
VIOV
10.6%

Healthcare

DEEP
6.6%
VIOV
7.5%

Energy

DEEP
5.7%
VIOV
9.1%

Basic Materials

DEEP
4.8%
VIOV
6.3%

Communication Services

DEEP
4.1%
VIOV
3.4%

Real Estate

DEEP
3.1%
VIOV
8.8%

Utilities

DEEP

-

VIOV
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DEEP vs. VIOV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DEEP
DEEP Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
DEEP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DEEP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
DEEP Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
DEEP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
DEEP Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

VIOV
VIOV Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
VIOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VIOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
VIOV Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
VIOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
VIOV Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DEEP vs. VIOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF (DEEP) and Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF (VIOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DEEPVIOVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.35

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.35

3.99

-1.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.76

13.00

-6.24

DEEP vs. VIOV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DEEP Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is comparable to the VIOV Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DEEP and VIOV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DEEPVIOVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.46

2.03

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

0.26

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

0.43

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

0.53

-0.24

Drawdowns

DEEP vs. VIOV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DEEP drawdown since its inception was -52.52%, which is greater than VIOV's maximum drawdown of -47.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEEP and VIOV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DEEPVIOVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.52%

-47.36%

-5.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.87%

-9.33%

-2.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.40%

-28.44%

+0.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.40%

-28.44%

+0.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.52%

-47.36%

-5.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.02%

-1.28%

-0.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.40%

-7.38%

-3.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.12%

2.86%

+1.26%

Volatility

DEEP vs. VIOV - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF (DEEP) has a higher volatility of 5.67% compared to Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF (VIOV) at 4.54%. This indicates that DEEP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VIOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DEEPVIOVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.67%

4.54%

+1.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.29%

11.57%

+0.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.18%

18.41%

+0.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.65%

21.95%

-0.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.27%

23.89%

+0.38%

DEEP vs. VIOV - Expense Ratio Comparison

DEEP has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than VIOV's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

DEEP vs. VIOV - Dividend Comparison

DEEP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, less than VIOV's 1.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DEEP
Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF
1.52%1.78%1.96%1.67%1.28%1.43%4.03%3.49%1.51%2.01%3.14%3.98%
VIOV
Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF
1.59%1.69%1.78%2.18%1.81%1.59%1.42%1.60%1.76%1.43%1.17%1.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


DEEP and VIOV have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DEEP has higher volatility (5.67%) compared to VIOV (4.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DEEP dropped -52.52% vs VIOV's -47.36%.

On 10-year performance, VIOV leads with 10.23% vs 8.15% for DEEP. On fees, VIOV is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, VIOV has been the lower-risk option at 4.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VIOV has performed better with a 10.23% return vs 8.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VIOV is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for DEEP.

VIOV has the higher dividend yield at 1.59%, compared with 1.52% for DEEP.

DEEP tracks DEEP-US - Acquirers Deep Value Index, while VIOV tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for DEEP and 0.10% for VIOV.

VIOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DEEP and VIOV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer